Skip to comments.
Bloodbath ...... For Newspaper Circulation
Editor & Publisher via Drudge ^
| nov. 7, 2005
| Editor&Publisher
Posted on 11/07/2005 8:05:57 AM PST by blogblogginaway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: blogblogginaway
2
posted on
11/07/2005 8:11:17 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
The Liberals are slowly losing their monopoly...
To: blogblogginaway
Gee, does this mean when we graduate kids from high school that cannot read, that newspapers will lose sales? If so, watch out MSM, because the big hurt is still to come. I'm happy to see them lose their influence, and their ciculation. Less money=fewer liberal "journalists", which is good for all of us.
4
posted on
11/07/2005 8:12:30 AM PST
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: Youngman442002
Slowly? Seems like "light speed" to me.
5
posted on
11/07/2005 8:12:49 AM PST
by
Rutles4Ever
(Stuck on Genius)
To: blogblogginaway
It will be a great day when the US Military has all the weapons and ammo it needs, and the NYT has to hold a bake sale in order to give Maureen Dowd her drinking money.
6
posted on
11/07/2005 8:13:02 AM PST
by
RobFromGa
(Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran-- what are we waiting for?)
To: blogblogginaway
The print media is losing out to the instant world of news available today on your computer.
Their palpable liberal bias is another contributing factor ...
7
posted on
11/07/2005 8:13:52 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: blogblogginaway
The New York Times reported tiny gains with daily up 0.4% and Sunday up 0.1% I find this somehow questionable!
8
posted on
11/07/2005 8:14:25 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(Non-Y2K-Compliant)
To: blogblogginaway
How about the NY Post? It seems the Post and the WSJ (both of which have a conservative slant) are the only newspapers gaining readers...
9
posted on
11/07/2005 8:15:34 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: RobFromGa
They'd need a mortgage to pay for that.
To: blogblogginaway
IMHO the newspapers are paying the price for printing drivel. Pick up a newspaper, read a news article, then write down the facts that you learned. I think that you won't have many to list.
Another point is that their obvious bias is loosing readership.
To: blogblogginaway
The last time I picked up a Providence Journal, the entire front page was nothing but distortions, propaganda and outright lies.
Why pay for that when its everywhere in the lamestream for free.
To: JennysCool
I also....
The real question is "paid subscriptions" NOT so called "circulation" that allows them to count papers that they drop as hotels for free giveaway.
13
posted on
11/07/2005 8:19:11 AM PST
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: blogblogginaway
"The Star Tribune in Minneapolis lost a bit in daily, down 0.2% to 374,528. Sunday the paper took a hit, down 6% to 636,977."
Ahhhh! Sweets to the sweet!
14
posted on
11/07/2005 8:19:17 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
To: blogblogginaway
Gee, too bad they insulted 50% of their readers and they went elsewhere.
15
posted on
11/07/2005 8:19:18 AM PST
by
McGavin999
(Reporters write the Truth, Journalists write "Stories")
To: blogblogginaway
It's been a couple of years since I have dropped a couple of quarters in a newspaper box.
Haven't bought a Sunday paper in over a year.
16
posted on
11/07/2005 8:19:38 AM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: blogblogginaway
Liberals should love it, look at all the trees being saved.
To: RobFromGa
Excellent! That's the best post I've read in weeks.
18
posted on
11/07/2005 8:21:07 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
To: VRWCTexan
When ever I stay at a motel or hotel, I ask that I not be billed for a USA Today. You might assume this rag is free but its not.
To: WorkingClassFilth
20
posted on
11/07/2005 8:22:33 AM PST
by
RobFromGa
(Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran-- what are we waiting for?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson