Taking a cue from posts on FR?
CRY HAVOC AND LET SLIP THE HOUNDS OF TRUTH!
I will believe this when I see it.
I'm waiting.
The Dems are wartime traitors. Will the 'pubs speak this truth?
> Republican loyalists have been wondering why the
> President has allowed the Democrats to get away
> with calling him a liar.
Because GW was trying to be Presidential.
The Dems, of course, are being Gutter.
If this story is true, I wonder if the last straw was
the Rule 21 stunt. If even the Dem Senators are
tossing away the last pretension of being senatorial,
it's time to hit 'em with the truth (and BJ Clinton
too, who is way far from Presidential, with his post-
term sabotage of US interests).
I will believe it when it happens.
Let's hope it has more force than Senator Frist's 'gonna get really, really mad' at the Dems did.
Who was it that said "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on"?
.....we'll see
Doogle
Our Repubs and President are beginning to feel...'French'. . .I really hope there is substance to this 'relvelation'.
Long overdue ... Reagan was the Great Communicator. Thus far W has either been the NonCommunicator or the Poor Enunciator. Harry Truman managed to turn things around. Does W have what it takes?
Hey Doug,
I'm going to see my Wacko Liberal SIL today. Could you give me a reference for the Yellowcake??? I want to rub it in her smarmy face.
Thanks in advance!
NMM
This makes my entire day.
Hopefully Republicans and the WH will remember to remind the Democrats that when Clinton signed the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998, they sounded more hawkish than some of our Republicans sound today. And the Democrats warned about the danger that Iraq's WMD posed to the United States.
And while the WH is at it, hopefully they will remind voters that, despite the leftist lie that there was no connection between Iraq/AQ, it is Clinton's Justice Department that signed a federal indictment of bin Laden which mentioned his agreement with the country of Iraq not to attack that country in exchange for weapons development. That sounds an awful lot like a relationship to me.
Oh, and maybe someone in the administration will find it interesting to remind the voters that many 9/11 families sued Iraq in federal court for Iraq's involvement in 9/11, and the judge agreed with their findings.
Last Tuesday, Harry Reid took to the floor of the Senate and asserted that the Bush administration had "manufactured and manipulated intelligence in order to sell the war in Iraq and attempted to destroy those who dared to challenge its actions." If that charge had any validity, it would be an indictable offense. But it is, in reality, a damnable lie and reckless slander. The president needs to defend his name and the party needs to get behind him.
But it's Bush's move to make first.
I hope this is true. I have gotten sick of the go along to get along attitude, because it has gotten us nothing. Dealing with Dems is like dealing with Muslims. They seen any sign of "dialogue" and accomodation as weakness, and it's blood in the water to them.
It's time to walk the walk.
About damn time.
Sheeesh, I know I'm going to sound like such an ignoramus, but I hadn't heard that we found ANYTHING at all! Can you give me some links about the yellowcake so I can share them??