The article you quote from http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/429 ("Ramadan Rioting in Europe's No-Go Areas") suggest that since the French police force is obviously overwhelmed, untrained and unequipped against a street jihad, the French PM should send in the army to stop the riots. One little detail: about 23% of the French recruits are Muslims, mostly of North-African descent (2nd or 3rd generation). Career officers are increasingly clashing with rebellious privates who want the pay, the nice uniform (works wonder on girls), but not the orders from a roumi. Cultural and religious clashes now permeate the French barrack life.
I don't think it would be wise to rely on these troublemakers to keep roumis safe from other Muslims. The French authorities know it, even if they don't dare write it in the watered down slop that passes for a free press in Paris. So nope, no army, sorry Monsieur, and the police can't protect you, so your car will burn, the buses won't circulate, stay home.
Help! I blew it.
Title is supposed to be:
French Question Loyalty of Moslem Troops
URL is:
http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/200511513428.asp
To whomever added it, I like the "mooligans" keyword.
Roumi ? That's a new one on me.
He didn't make it through, recycled, but his words have always stayed with me.
We have a problem in our ranks too.
Does this mean that the French army will now surrender to its own troops?
Prolly the Moslems refuse to take surrender training.
What a gawd awful mess the Froggies have made for themselves.
I'm glad Mexico is a Christian nation.
why do the french need an army? they never use it.
And, one again, we are told that the Moslem soldiers, like Moslim civilizans, are not responsible for their actions. All this is a reaction to the crushing oppression they suffer from every single day of their life.
IOW, one can do no good and one can do no evil.
The French military? What does it matter?