Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sell the Peace Tower to Wal-Mart? ... Rex Murphy, Canadian Commentator
CBC ^ | November 2, 2005 | Rex Murphy

Posted on 11/03/2005 8:01:59 PM PST by NorthOf45

Sell the Peace Tower to Wal-Mart?

Rex Murphy for CBC's "The National"
November 2, 2005

I don't know what else the federal Liberals could do to sully their party's reputation.

Sell the Peace Tower to Wal-Mart?

Turn the House of Commons into a time-share Club Med, with the proceeds going to a pool for David Dingwall's severance package?

But outside of those extremes, they've hit the bottom of the barrel, dug underneath the barrel, and found an even lower place where there are no self-respecting barrels at all.

Once an independent commission has fired almost a full thousand pages talking about kickbacks, false receipts, fraud, rogue bureaucrats, and utter unaccountability, there's really not much left... unless there are plans to turn the Mint in to a private casino, to unshackle the Liberal Party from those paltry and antique notions of honour, integrity, and the public good.

Paul Martin is still standing, but only by virtue of Judge Gomery's assessment that during the period Messrs. Guité, Corriveau, and Brault and all the other worthies were shovelling the public money from one pocket to another and creating more instant millionaires than Lotto 6/49, Mr. Martin was merely the country's Finance Minister, the second most powerful man in the party and in the government, on his way to becoming the first.

On Judge Gomery's understanding, Paul Martin was the lone saint in the brothel, the unoccupied first mate on an otherwise very busy pirate ship. It is a distinction of sorts but a distinction that doesn't really, when you think about it, have a lot to offer. His innocence, and I'm not questioning it in the slightest, about the goings-on in the Quebec wing of the Liberal Party during the years he was conducting an internal coup to take over the entire party has about it an almost miraculous obtuseness. For close to a decade, a stealth department operating out of the PMO was hurling millions upon millions of dollars to the partisan machinery in Quebec, his home province; and the Finance Minister, Head of the Treasury Board, was a lone Mother Theresa keeping her head down in the bordello.

By far the best dramatics yesterday were Jean Chrétien's. He's going to ask the courts to investigate Judge Gomery. Considering all the people Mr. Chrétien hasn't asked the courts to investigate, this is at least novel. If Mr. Chrétien is angry at this point, maybe he should be angry at how his great plan to advertise Quebec back in to the confederation turned in to a slush fund for indolent advertising agencies, how the plundering of the unity fund has so ticked off Quebecers, both for its corruption and its stupidity, that they are now more ready for separation than at any other time since the referendum of 1995.

If Mr. Chrétien, who started the unity fund, wants to disown both its execution and its effects, then I guess it really wasn't very much to brag about in the first place. Actually, an apology from Mr. Chrétien for the mischiefs this harebrained and reckless scheme has caused, both to his party and to the country, would do a lot more for his reputation and legacy than all of his self-regarding histrionics with Judge Gomery. I don't know what will bring down the Liberal Party.

If two years of ad scam, plundering the public purse, re-igniting separatism, confusing their party with our government, and wounding the very system of politics itself doesn't argue it's time for a change, it's time to question why we bother have elections in the first place. Ad scam was institutionalized theft via the party in power. That's some platform for a fifth term.

For "The National," I'm Rex Murphy.


TOPICS: Canada; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; rexmurphy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
His innocence, and I'm not questioning it in the slightest, ...

Now, I didn't see the televised version, but for those who are unfamiliar with Murphy, I can guarantee that the above comment was dripping in sarcasm.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 8:02:00 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; fanfan; timsbella; NZerFromHK; Fair Go

Rex Murphy Ping


2 posted on 11/03/2005 8:03:38 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

Ah, good ol' CBC. I'm surprised they never renamed it Pravda...


3 posted on 11/03/2005 8:04:52 PM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

I'm surprised they still let Murphy voice his opinion. It always goes against their leftist agenda.


4 posted on 11/03/2005 8:07:18 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

What are the odds the Liberals will be returned next election?


5 posted on 11/03/2005 8:16:13 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

CBC trying to look non partisan (joke). Reality is that everyone pretty much knows that the chances of the Liberals *not* being re-elected are slim to none.
By next spring it will be old news (except in Quebec).


6 posted on 11/03/2005 8:18:37 PM PST by motorola7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

Although the sarcasm is not obvious in this small quote, the article as a whole, reeks of it. Great article. It seems the writer has a "decent" grasp of the politics of our Northern neighbors.


7 posted on 11/03/2005 8:19:06 PM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

The writer has an excellent grasp of the politics. He's a Newfie and he says what he thinks.


8 posted on 11/03/2005 8:24:34 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go

I wish I had the answer ... it's a crap shoot. The recent scandals will have an affect. The question is, will it be enough? I sure hope so. The problem too is the left-leaning MSM up here and the sheeple that believe what they hear.


9 posted on 11/03/2005 8:27:10 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

Anywhere else and the Liberals would be gone!


10 posted on 11/03/2005 8:35:18 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go

Yes ... sadly.


11 posted on 11/03/2005 8:37:47 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

I watched it last night - Rex was absolutely seething!


12 posted on 11/03/2005 9:06:34 PM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
"Sell the Peace Tower to Wal-Mart?"

Nah. Sell it to McDonald's
13 posted on 11/03/2005 10:30:29 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
I don't know what will bring down the Liberal Party.



;-)
14 posted on 11/03/2005 10:34:15 PM PST by caveat emptor (North of 50)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go; NorthOf45

They won't get defeated. The Tories in Ontario see the true blue conservatives as Uncle Sam's henchmen. There are enough from New Brunswick to Newfoundland voting for continuing the "goodies".

The Liberals will return to power. This will trigger Western separatism and by 2011 at least Alberta will no longer be in Canada.


15 posted on 11/03/2005 11:05:12 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Alberta independentists to Canada (read: Ontario and Quebec): One hundred years is long enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

From what I know of Canada the Liberals will certainly be returned. Anywhere else and they would be decimated.


16 posted on 11/03/2005 11:15:33 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

They have TV's in Canada now?


17 posted on 11/03/2005 11:17:13 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

They have the Internet in Oklahoma? ; )


18 posted on 11/04/2005 5:04:29 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear; NorthOf45

No, they don't have real TV, but rather, predetermined channels extolling virtues of the late Great Leader (Kim Il-sung, oops, Pierre Trudeau) and the Dear Leader (Kim Jong-il, oops, Paul Martin). All brought to you courtesy of Pyongyang (sorry again, it should be Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal).

The difference between Canada and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is that political opponents are jailed - yet.


19 posted on 11/04/2005 3:28:50 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Alberta independentists to Canada (read: Ontario and Quebec): One hundred years is long enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

Yup, and getting ABC, CBS and NBC included in our basic cable package just adds to the brainwashing. : )


20 posted on 11/05/2005 5:48:15 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson