Posted on 11/02/2005 3:35:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry
A school board member who was questioned by a federal judge about discrepancies in his testimony on the purchase of "intelligent design" textbooks was expected to return to the witness stand Wednesday.
Dover Area School Board member Alan Bonsell was to undergo redirect questioning by an attorney representing the board in a landmark trial over whether intelligent design can be introduced in high school science classes.
Bonsell testified Monday that he had received an $850 check from fellow board member William Buckingham. The check was made out to Bonsell's father, who volunteered to donate copies of "Of Pandas and People" to the district.
U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III asked Bonsell why he never shared that information in a January deposition when he was repeatedly asked under oath about who was involved in making the donation. Bonsell, who served as the board's president in 2004, said he misspoke. [Note to school board lawyers: When the judge asks your client why he's lying, it's usually not a good sign.]
Buckingham testified Thursday he collected $850 in donations to help purchase the books during a Sunday service at his church.
The board is defending its October 2004 decision to require students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. The statement says Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact," has inexplicable "gaps," and refers students to the textbook for more information.
Eight families are suing to have intelligent design removed from the biology curriculum because they believe the policy essentially promotes the Bible's view of creation, and therefore violates the constitutional separation of church and state.
Intelligent design supporters argue that natural selection, an element of evolutionary theory, cannot fully explain the origin of life or the emergence of highly complex life forms.
The trial began Sept. 26 and is expected to conclude on Friday.
|
The CrevoSci Archive Just one of the many services of Darwin Central "The Conspiracy that Cares" |
CrevoSci threads for the past week:
CrevoSci Warrior Freepdays for the month of November:
2000-11-10 AncientAirs 2000-11-21 AndrewC 1998-11-18 angelo 1999-11-22 Blood of Tyrants 2003-11-26 blowfish 2004-11-08 CarolinaGuitarman 1997-11-28 cd jones 2001-11-30 claptrap 2001-11-16 CobaltBlue 2002-11-21 DannyTN 2004-11-16 DaveLoneRanger 1997-11-30 Ditto 2001-11-16 dmz |
2000-11-11 Ernest_at_the_Beach 2000-11-02 Exit 109 2000-11-12 ForGod'sSake 2001-11-07 FourtySeven 2000-11-10 Godel 2004-11-06 GreenOgre 2000-11-04 harbinger of doom 2000-11-28 HiTech RedNeck 1999-11-05 Ichneumon 1998-11-13 jennyp 1998-11-25 Junior_G 2002-11-17 Just mythoughts 2004-11-11 kaotic133 |
2003-11-18 little jeremiah 1998-11-18 malakhi 2000-11-06 mrjeff 1999-11-05 muleskinner 2003-11-17 Nathan Zachary 2002-11-12 NCLaw441 1999-11-25 Nebullis 2000-11-13 NYer 2000-11-24 old-ager 2004-11-03 PajamaHadin 2000-11-10 Patriotic Teen 1998-11-01 Pharmboy |
2000-11-11 P-Marlowe 2000-11-16 presidio9 2002-11-14 Remedy 2000-11-30 Right Wing Professor 2004-11-18 rightwinggoth 1998-11-15 rob777 1998-11-04 RobRoy 1999-11-16 TerP26 2000-11-04 TigerTale 2004-11-11 untrained skeptic 2000-11-05 will of the people 2003-11-29 woodb01 |
In Memoriam
|
Lost CrevoSci Battlefields (Pulled Threads)
Longest CrevoSci Thread Ever 2002-12-11 Evolution Disclaimer Supported (6,871 replies)
Glossary of Terms
Crevo: Creation vs. evolution
CrevoSci: Creation vs. evolution/Science
CrevoSci Warriors: Those who take part on CrevoSci threads
Freepday: The day a Freeper joined Free Republic
The
official beer
of Darwin Central
Don't forget the state of Kansas.
Democracy is scary. You just can't allow or trust a bunch of slope-headed slack-jawed Christians to elect school board members to represent their views and design a school program curriculum. The State must shove Darwinism and athiesm down their throats until we eliminate this this scourge called Christianity.
/sarc
Christianity survived Copernicus and it will survive Darwin. God is not offended by our discovering how things work.
Democracy has nothing to do with it when the democratically elected morons breach people's constitutional rights. If you democratically elected a bunch of people who decided to institute Islam as the official religion of the United States, you'd be one of the first of the mouth-breathers lining up in protest.
I'm still not 100% optimistic about a win (though that may be my pessimistic side attempting to avert potential disappointment...when it comes to pseudoscience, to me the glass is always half empty.)
Another (humorously) interesting link from FoxNews - apparently the key to the true genius of Einstein & Darwin is managing your inbox .
Democracy is scary. You just can't allow or trust a bunch of slope-headed slack-jawed Christians to elect school board members to represent their views and design a school program curriculum. The State must shove Darwinism and athiesm down their throats until we eliminate this this scourge called Christianity.
Teaching semi-inteligent design as a valid alternative to evolution is just one step from teaching that the earth is flat with 4 corners like the bible says as a valid alternative to conventional geography.
So9
I'm cautious, as well. Pseudoscience is a pernicious and seductive evil, appealing to many people partly because it re-inforces prejudices and partly because it offers simple solutions to complex issues.
It's like liberalism - fuzzy-headed, feel-good answers to tough questions. Feelings over facts, emotions over reason. And just like liberalism, pseudoscience will continue to win converts among them who want easy answers.
That's why we can't let down our guard, even when our opponents are as transparent and incompetent as this bunch of yahoos.
"The real object of the [first] amendment was, not to countenance, much less to advance Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment, which should give to an hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government..." - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story
"There is simply no historical foundation for the proposition that the framers intended to build a wall of separation...
... the "wall of separation between church and State" is a metaphor based on bad history, a metaphor which has proved useless as a guide to judging. It should be frankly and explicitly abandoned." -- Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist
And I for one will being going through withdrawl symptoms once it is over; this has been the most illuminating and entertaining trial I've ever seen reported, featuring an ID "Scientist" who claims that despite having no idea what the mechanism is for ID, he can none the less "see" it based on "purposeful arrangement of parts," plus several members of the school board who have variously lied & dissembled, and thus probably perjured themselves and obstructed justice whilst under oath.
Essentially, the notion that ID is science has been crushed, the notion that this school board wanted to introduce the statement in question for reasons unrelated to religion has been demolished, and the board memebers' integrity lies [no pun intended] in a smoldering heap.
It doesn't get any better than this.... unless of course the judge has the board members arrested and thrown in jail for perjury, obstruction, or contempt of court. He could just as well charge them with felony stupidity, but that would be "piling on."
I need a shower after the thread I just came from. YEEECCHHH!!! Wouldn't have pinged my worst enemy to it.
Would it shock you to know he was writing in 1833, well before the passage of the 14th Amendment, and that his views are a minority view of what the law is??? Look, we can debate back and forth about what the law should be, but not what the law is. (You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts, as someone on these boards keeps noting.)
Funny, William Rehnquist telling us that Jefferson didn't actually mean what Jefferson said he meant.
Oh, no! Just ask connectthedots. Everything is going swimmingly for the defense. They're refuting all allegations and it's all wonderful.
[Whoops! There goes another load of winged monkeys out of my rectum!]
He's telling us that Jefferson didn't mean what Hugo Black said Jefferson meant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.