Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia says new Topol RS-12 mobile ICBM can evade U.S. missile defense
RBC.ru via translation ^ | November 2, 2005

Posted on 11/01/2005 11:32:56 PM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: operation clinton cleanup
Also, do we have any rail launched missiles anymore?

Did we ever, besides on the drawing board?

There were plans to have 50 Peacekeeper ICBM's moved around the U.S. by rail so it would be impossible for the Soviets to target them but Congress killed that idea.

81 posted on 11/02/2005 6:27:21 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (http://www.navyfield.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

I don't know. That's why I asked.


82 posted on 11/02/2005 6:29:27 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

sorry I included the word "anymore"


83 posted on 11/02/2005 6:29:58 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Sorry, didn't mean it to sound that way. Democrat congress killed idea of making MX rail-mobile... or any scheme that would make the Soviets feel venerable.
84 posted on 11/02/2005 6:34:42 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
You're part right. The ABM missile system, using stand-off blasts from 5 meg warheads exoatmospheric(meaning out of the atmosphere)and small, ER-type("neutron bomb") endoatmospheric interceptors was dismantled in 1975. The idea was to burst the big warhead in the path of a bunch of RV's from incoming Missiles, and knock them out , still in space, before reentry. Some of the RV's , would evade the blasts, and so the Smaller missiles with the ER warheads would burst inside of the atmosphere, at high altitude, to knock out RV"s that penetrated the atmosphere,before they reached the target area.

Democrats, listening to envoromental and anti-nuclear groups, however, fought the system from the beginning, and it was successfully dismantled, only 1 day after becomming operational!!

However, the missiles were called Spartans(exo') and Sprints(endo's) Look up the Sprint launch. It is fascinating to see, it is FAST!!!(had to be, to intercept an RV that had made it through reentry.)

85 posted on 11/02/2005 7:13:45 PM PST by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: elbucko; All
SO right you are. Most people are more in tune, to Hollywood, and what Ben Afleck or Jennifer Garner are doing, or what fashion styles are hot nowdays, to remotely understand the threat that ICBM's (even the older ones) pose.Ask an average person what MIRV means, and they will respond"wasn't he a talk-show producer"? Ask what staging means, and they will probably say, " Oh , that is when the actors do things that are not spontaneous", and so on. Most even believe that we can stop ICBM"s, saying "we got a system to intercept them". If only this was true.

Now, it seems that the country that can't feed it's people, or pay its soldiers, is trying to one-up the US, and deploy a missile with MARV warheads. (maneuverable reentry vehicles, that can evade defenses against them). Of course, in Russia, they don't have to worry about special interest groups opposing any of this, like the US does. They "just do it".

I wonder how safe the average, uneducated US citizen would feel, knowing that the main US land-based ICBM, (the Minuteman III), is nearing 40 years old now, while Russia is preparing to field one worlds more intelligent, that the Minuteman.
86 posted on 11/02/2005 7:26:33 PM PST by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Russia has tanks that are better than the M1, and are rebuilding/modernizing their Air and naval fleets.
87 posted on 11/03/2005 12:42:06 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
but are their tanks better than JSOW?

It ain't likely to be a tank on a tank battle.

88 posted on 11/03/2005 10:36:49 PM PST by GeronL (Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Tac Nukes work too!


89 posted on 11/03/2005 11:06:35 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Tac Nukes would be a good name for a rock band


90 posted on 11/03/2005 11:18:35 PM PST by GeronL (Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
The radioactive clouds of cobalt would overwhelm Russia's ability to respond for a few hundred thousand years.

IIRC, the radioactive cobalt has a half life of about 5 years. Still, that'd be long enough to make you want to move to a different neighborhood.

91 posted on 12/27/2005 3:40:53 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Hey what kind of mobile launchers do we have? Also, do we have any rail launched missiles anymore

The rail and mobile missile systems were in the developmental stage but we never deployed the system. The MX program was to had a rail and mobile system but the idea was scrapped.
92 posted on 06/24/2006 8:01:44 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Seemed like a good idea at the time... probably saved us billions by going the silo route.

The MX system was to be built all over the Southwest United States. It would consist of a number of large circular (or close-looped) railroad tracks. All along the railroad tracks are missile sites, most of which are either fake sites or empty underground “silos,” and only a few of which contain missiles (intercontinental ballistic missiles, aimed at targets in the Soviet Union). A train keeps moving the missiles from site to site in a manner such that the Russians don’t know which sites contain missiles. The system was often referred to as “the racetrack system.”


93 posted on 06/24/2006 8:11:17 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

I seemed pictures and diagrams of it.It would have been interesting to see in operation.


94 posted on 06/24/2006 10:32:22 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

You mean Cobalt-Thorium G?
Thank you Dr. Stangelove!


95 posted on 06/24/2006 10:38:43 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

If you want to do some real damage explode one ton on antimatter. The result would be a 40,000 megaton explosion.


96 posted on 06/24/2006 10:47:20 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
Theoretically
97 posted on 06/24/2006 10:48:45 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Simple answer, add one pound of cobalt to each American warhead and a proximity sensor trigger.

The United Kingdom reputedly conducted a nuclear experiment involving cobalt as a radioactive tracer in 1957, at the Tadje site, Maralinga range, Australia, but it was announced to be a failure.
98 posted on 06/24/2006 10:56:58 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson