To: Southack
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again.
20 posted on
11/01/2005 2:23:45 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
To: PhiKapMom
..
"Will someone please tell me what in hell is going on here ?"
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again. It all started with quidam who helped Clinton escape impeachment by raising the bar and getting many FReepers to jump off the deep end claiming that there were video tapes of Clinton doing coke with moronica.
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again. Since college in the 60's I've advocated beating the hell out of war protesters, and have done so, does that count?
101 posted on
11/01/2005 2:58:21 PM PST by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(A right wing Christian, not part of the Christian Right)
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again.This bears repeating. I didn't really realize the extent of the whole troll situation until this last year, right around Terri Schiavo.
This is not like a typical message board that discusses music or whatever. The stakes are much, much higher.
169 posted on
11/01/2005 3:46:27 PM PST by
proud American in Canada
(I am in such a good mood today, and tomorrow, and the next day, and... Thank you, President Bush!)
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again.For sure.
184 posted on
11/01/2005 4:01:21 PM PST by
ladyinred
("Progressive" = code word for Communist/Nazi)
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again.I don't think this can be stressed too strongly. Just the other night I explained to a person I'd just met (who had read FR before) why I wouldn't give out my screenname. I used this episode with MD4 as an example.
AND it's another reason why it's my firm policy to not open freepmail from somebody that I don't know.
215 posted on
11/01/2005 4:40:24 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: PhiKapMom
"when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again."
===
I guess he was a typical "agent provocateur". Old commie trick. People need to be wary.
289 posted on
11/01/2005 7:03:19 PM PST by
FairOpinion
(CA Props: Vote for Reform: YES on 73-78, NO on 79 & 80, NO on Y)
To: PhiKapMom
Sure hope some folks get a clue that we do have trolls on here from the RATs and when they see someone posting that advocates dirty tricks against the Dems, better take a second look and then look again. Worth repeating.
370 posted on
11/02/2005 6:35:49 AM PST by
GOPJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson