So is this story slanted or the facts shaded a bit? This is common practice in the liberal press, you do know that? Especially when it comes to Christianity.
Yes, it's a slanted article. Many facts missing, including the one that shows that the Baptists were indeed handing out the water.
Here's a question -- were people going *without* water because the Baptists weren't giving the Busch water to them? Were there, for example, cases of Dasani being handed out?