Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada - More Dangerous To USA Than Mexico
Opinion Editorials ^ | 10/30/05 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 10/30/2005 9:12:20 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus

The neo-isolationists that fill the far right of the Conservative movement, fanned on by certain insincere radio hosts, have become so exorcised by Mexico that the issue is close to eclipsing the GWOT; the Global War On Terror.

The gnashing of teeth and wearing of sackcloth has, for some, reached such a fever pitch that no other issue is important to them. They are fixated on the fact that Mexico is the most dangerous thing the USA faces in the 21st century, that Mexico will destroy our culture, or destroy our economy. And this as we prosecute a war, yet.

Of course, we have major problems with our nearest neighbor to the south. We have rampant illegal crossings, drug smuggling with impunity and a loss of a large block of our economy as Mexicans send US dollars home to Mexico instead of spending it here.

But a little perspective would be nice because Mexico isn’t the most imminent danger the USA faces in the neighborhood. Canada is more of an immediate threat to our security by far than is Mexico.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinioneditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; alqaeda; canada; gwot; illegals; immigrantlist; mexico; war; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last
To: COEXERJ145
And you're using Joseph Farah as a source. Ha Ha Ha Ha!

Where's your evidence to dispute him?

21 posted on 10/30/2005 9:39:46 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Wrong; american democrats are much more dangerous..

Wrong again. It's the MSM who present the greatest danger...

22 posted on 10/30/2005 9:40:05 AM PST by CommandoFrank (Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

no, but you do not have a bunch of sand people so significant in presense in toronto and ottawa that they can affect govt policy.

these immigrants made such a stink when combinedwith the leftist frenchies - who relate to the new parisian french - invoked the comments of bush

and

forced the gov't to not back the US when it chose to go to iraq.

thus the birth of mad cow disease. there is a price for everything.

your observation is very true, but we have been living under your umbrella

ande are now biting your hand


23 posted on 10/30/2005 9:44:52 AM PST by jackson29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I believe that the Canadian province of Ontario(the largest economically and population wise) let's sharia law determine some case between muslims.

If the recommendation had been accepted, Ontario would have become the first Western jurisdiction to allow the use of Sharia.

I think our voice got heard loud and clear, and I thank the government for coming out with no faith-based arbitrations
Homa Ar-Jomand
Women's rights activist
Mr McGuinty said he would introduce "as soon as possible" a law banning all religious arbitration in the province.

Ontario has allowed Catholic and Jewish faith-based tribunals to resolve family disputes on a voluntary basis since 1991.

Apparently you don't have a problem with them using Catholic and Jewish law to resolve family disputes. Also, they don't use Sharia law to supercede Canadian law. Just in family disputes. Try to tell the whole story, please.

24 posted on 10/30/2005 9:49:00 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: raybbr
Have you ever read any of Farah's writings? He is worse than anyone at the New York Times. He discredits himself with everything he writes. Farah claimed several dozen Al-Qaeda nukes were set to go off in the U.S. Farah claimed Iran was about to hit the U.S. with a massive EMP strike. Neither of which happened. (Of course he was hoping for both.)

Farah plays to the anti-Bush, isolationist, Pat Buchanan style kooks. He actually wants this country attacked so he can destroy President Bush.

Find a better source than World Nut Daily and their kook, Joseph Farah.

26 posted on 10/30/2005 9:50:09 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (http://www.navyfield.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

What, exactly, are you disputing? Are you saying there are no muslims in mexico? Do a google search and you will find many hits on the growing population of muslims in mexico. You may not like Farah but you still haven't shown him to be wrong in what I quoted.


27 posted on 10/30/2005 9:53:43 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CommandoFrank
[ Wrong again. It's the MSM who present the greatest danger... ]

And the MsM proponents you describe.. What party are akin to be a part of.?.. You have forgotten academia too I believe.. almost universally dumbocrats..

28 posted on 10/30/2005 9:54:07 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Ontario(the largest economically and population wise) let's sharia law determine some case between Muslims.

Nope. They may determine what ever amongst themselves , just like anyone else , but they're not getting any support from the court system. You're wrong.

29 posted on 10/30/2005 9:54:33 AM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Apparently you don't have a problem with them using Catholic and Jewish law to resolve family disputes.

Huh, please tell me the number of Jewish or Catholic homicide bombers.

Amamzing that your animus towards Christian Mexicans clouds the facts about radical islam.

30 posted on 10/30/2005 9:57:36 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
But the problem IS that they CONSIDERED it through their court system at ALL!!!

Why? Both Quebec and Ontario turned it down. It's done with. Now which state will be the first to accept it? I understand one in particular Michigan , has a huge Muslin population. Maybe larger than all Canada.

31 posted on 10/30/2005 9:59:56 AM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The point of the original article wasn't that there is NO terrorist threat from Mexico, but that Canada has more by FAR than does Mexico. I think the writer said by magnitudes of hundreds of reports?

He didn't say there aren't any Muslims in Mexico, just that Canada is the greater threat.


32 posted on 10/30/2005 10:03:17 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
Why? Both Quebec and Ontario turned it down. It's done with. Now which state will be the first to accept it? I understand one in particular Michigan , has a huge Muslin population. Maybe larger than all Canada.

I doubt that. Toronto has a huge muslim population.

33 posted on 10/30/2005 10:03:26 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman

If they considered it at all that means they are NOT placing the prime importance on their own Constitutionally created laws but allowing foreign cultural "feelings" to dictate policy. This is a recipe for self-destruction.


34 posted on 10/30/2005 10:05:01 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Amamzing that your animus towards Christian Mexicans clouds the facts about radical islam.

Dane, if you can't read this afternoon then don't bother to reply. I said nothing whatever about mexican Christians. You brought up the Sharia law thing in Canada and I tell you that they use Catholic and Jewish law to settle family disputes and that somehow tranlsates into animus toward mexican Christians?

How?

There is no connection whatsoever except maybe in your dislocated synapses.

35 posted on 10/30/2005 10:06:32 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Muslims in Mexico = 1.000

Muslims in USA = at least 3.000.000

Obviously, we should be worried about the muslims in Mexico !

36 posted on 10/30/2005 10:08:44 AM PST by waiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
There is no connection whatsoever except maybe in your dislocated synapses

Again I ask you of what I asked in my reply #30, how many Christian/Jewish homicide/suicide bombers, are there.

You know the answer, but won't state it.

37 posted on 10/30/2005 10:13:36 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; B4Ranch; All

It's called race baiting. It's the only tool they have. Shame, isn't it?

BTW, Rumsfeld, Adm. Loy and many others have warned about terrorist coming across the Southern Border. The OBLobby ignores all that. Many reports of apprenensions of Arab OTMS as well, but they also ignore that.

There are many Muslim mosques/schools in Mexico. And many Hispanic mosques in the USA. They also ignore that.

And who is Mexico's new best friend? Iran.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1511584/posts

Iran bringing “many divers, sophisticated technology” to Gulf of Mexico

As B4Ranch said, "
If you want to make people angry, lie to them.
If you want to make them absolutely livid, then tell 'em the truth."


38 posted on 10/30/2005 10:15:51 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement (You can’t tell someone much about a boxing glove until it hits them in the face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus; Americanwolf
Canada's muslim population is more of an immediate threat to our security by far than is Mexico.

Needed to adjust that sentence a little bit. Canada itself is about as dangerous as France.AWB

39 posted on 10/30/2005 10:16:48 AM PST by Americanwolfsbrother (Don't hate on someone for using their mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Again I ask you of what I asked in my reply #30, how many Christian/Jewish homicide/suicide bombers, are there.

Gee, Dane. In answer to your non-sequitor question, I would have to say "None that I know of". So what? How does that translate into your personal attack against me by claiming I have animus towards Christian mexicans?

Really, you are so bereft of an argument that it's pointless to carry it on.

40 posted on 10/30/2005 10:25:55 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson