Are you saying that if someone is determined to be a predator by a mental health expert they can then be placed on the sexual predators lists?
That's just so wromg.
Where was this supreme court when Clinton was giving us retroactive taxes????????
Let's assume a man is following little children (not against the law, nor a sex crime). He is questioned by a police psychologist, to whom he tells that he wants to rape children. What's your game plan?
If someone can be determined by mental health experts, according to legal standards, to be a danger to themselves or others then they should be subject to either monitering or commitment. There's nothing wrong with confining a dangerous psychopath. It's just common sense.