If someone can be determined by mental health experts, according to legal standards, to be a danger to themselves or others then they should be subject to either monitering or commitment. There's nothing wrong with confining a dangerous psychopath. It's just common sense.
You do understand that the DUmmies over at the DUmp think you and I are dangerous psychopaths, don't you? GWB is one too, that goes without saying.
They came pretty close in 2004 to be at the left hand of the President.
I think the predators we are talking about are extremely dangerous, and many of them need to be sentenced to death by a court of law, and the execution carried out quickly. I don't care about the deterrent aspect, I just want them permanently gone. If some up and coming predator learns from it, that's just a bonus.
The correct way to do this is change laws, (O’Reilly is making a contribution to that) and force the court to apply them. The idea that somehow we can 'go back' and punish further will end badly. Either you and I will be in jail, or the DUmmies will. History has proven that over and over again, which is why the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution as it is.