Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JTN

This article is very misleading and a good example of why a lot of these so called Public Health articles are BS. I work in this field, and I can tell you anecdotally at least (and we are talking thousands of cases I've reviewed) that although pot smokers don't seem to have an increased risk of lung cancer, they do seem to have very high rates of head and neck cancers. These cases usually involve men in their 40s-60s, and most of the ones I've seen also smoke tobacco. Also, epidemiologically speaking they do not have a method in the cancer case reporting programs to record whether or not a person smokes pot. We do collect tobacco and alcohol information, and in the military and VA hospitals Agent orange, Asbestos and Chemical Exposure information is collected as well. THERE IS NO ONE on a national, sustained basis collecting information on mariuuana smokers and cancer.


14 posted on 10/29/2005 4:16:56 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: binreadin; JTN; albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; ..
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
23 posted on 10/29/2005 6:47:41 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: binreadin

I can tell you what my significant other's experience has shown after treating thousands of drug addicts: Most of them started out using pot.

Horrible stuff!


29 posted on 10/29/2005 8:05:54 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson