Skip to comments.
IT'S AN OLIGARCHY, STUPID!
today's news
| October 28, 2005
| Bob Ireland
Posted on 10/28/2005 1:13:18 PM PDT by Bob Ireland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
?Is the American Revolution dead?
To: mcmuffin; Matchett-PI; gonzo; MinuteGal; oldglory; Seeking the truth
2
posted on
10/28/2005 1:17:11 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
To: Bob Ireland
Sounds like an oligarchy to me!
3
posted on
10/28/2005 1:18:52 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
To: Bob Ireland
Howdy Bob!
This helps to explain it:
To: Bob Ireland
Now there's a name I haven't seen around here in a while...
5
posted on
10/28/2005 1:19:30 PM PDT
by
Brian Mosely
(A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned)
To: Bob Ireland
This should be interesting
6
posted on
10/28/2005 1:20:16 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Jim Robinson
They are just like Sinn Fein/IRA!
7
posted on
10/28/2005 1:22:47 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
To: Bob Ireland
I agree with you. We certainly have a ruling class. And it is perilous times for those who believe in the Constitution and limited government. And the left isn't the only side chipping away at the Constitution, either.
8
posted on
10/28/2005 1:30:19 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Bob Ireland
Let's not forget that ol' slick is a disbarred lawyer ~ something the media has totally ignored as they continue to always refer to him as President clinton while, , as a gesture of disdain, deliberately referring to President Bush as Mister Bush!!
9
posted on
10/28/2005 1:31:23 PM PDT
by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: Bob Ireland
Uh, Bob.
Nice to see you.
It can't be an oligarchy of democrats.
The Republicans are in charge.
So, it might be a Cowardacracy or a Dumbocracy, but how can it be an oligarchy run by the party who is out of party?
Just incompetants being jerked around by a bunch of thugs.
To: Jim Robinson
Precisely and that's why on a post earlier this week I said I can no longer even vote for two local democrats that I consider friends/acquantances for small time, very insignificant local positions. They are registered with a party which has become a criminal enterprise and unless/until they switch to any other party, Libertarian, Independant, Whig, I really don't care, I can't support them.
11
posted on
10/28/2005 1:35:38 PM PDT
by
marlon
To: Bob Ireland
Because, for example, the Clinton's were both proved ... I read this far, saw the use of the apostrophe to indicate a plural, and decided that if the author wasn't professional enough to proofread his work, his thoughts probably weren't worth wasting my time upon.
Sloppy writing bespeaks sloppy thinking.
12
posted on
10/28/2005 1:36:18 PM PDT
by
Junior
(From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
To: Bob Ireland
Nothing wrong with an oligarchy, except some of the Commies use the term in derogation. Some countries write constitutions especially to institute their oligarchy in an orderly way. The whole world as bourgeois, imagine! No more plebs, no more proles, everybody bourgeois, that's the way we are headed since the failure of Marxism has become apparent to even the blindest anarchist.
13
posted on
10/28/2005 1:36:44 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Bob Ireland
I find it hard to believe that you can call a country an oligarchy when the example that is given is someone who grew up dirt-poor and went on to become President of the United States. I should note I have complete and utter disdain for President Clinton, and wish that he had never arrived on the political scene.
14
posted on
10/28/2005 1:42:08 PM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: Bob Ireland
You forgot to mention Sandy Burgler. And how about the guy who helped Clinton launder his oil for food money? And how about [fill in the blanks ad nauseum].
15
posted on
10/28/2005 1:45:43 PM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
However you look at it, it's an oligarchy.
1 President
1 Vice President
9 Supreme Court Justices
100 Senators
435 Congressmen
546 people at the top of 300 million. Sounds like a classic oligarchy to me.
IMO, we must repeal the 17th Amendment and enlarge the House of Representatives dramatically.
Power in the Senate has to be returned to the states and the people are now way to numerous to be represented by 435 people in any effective way.
16
posted on
10/28/2005 1:56:20 PM PDT
by
metesky
(This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
To: Jim Robinson
Hi, J.R.!!
Let's take a garbage truck to the DNC and reward them suitably? ;-)
17
posted on
10/28/2005 2:11:16 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
To: mysterio
***the left isn't the only side chipping away***
Certainly not! [...and the media has become a dangerous horror also!]
18
posted on
10/28/2005 2:13:18 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
To: Brian Mosely
19
posted on
10/28/2005 2:14:13 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
To: Bob Ireland
And we have good men and women sacrificing their lives for this?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson