Posted on 10/28/2005 12:05:16 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
OK, Let's hear what Levin has to say.
LOL.... Sounds great to me.
"CNN inadvertently caught a very ironic moment as it covered Joe Wilson's attorney reading a statement from Wilson. In the statement, Wilson made some trite remarks about how he had been punished for speaking truth to power, blah blah blah, but then he said, "I have a request. While I may engage in public discourse, my wife and my family are private people... they do not wish to be under the glare of the cameras."
"The irony? At that very moment, CNN's Situation Room had another screen showing the picture of Wilson and his wife from their "Vanity Fair" photo shoot. Whoops!
"And the guest Wolf Blitzer had on right after the statement was Senate Intelligence Committee member Orrin Hatch, who was able to inform viewers at that key moment that his committee's bipartisan report found that Wilson "did not tell the truth" on a number of matters, such as what he found in Niger and whether his wife recommended him for the trip. Whoops again!
"I'm sure CNN didn't mean to make Wilson look like such a fool, but that was certainly the effect."
yes....on ABC NewsTalk XM radio channel 124 at noon to 2.
Oh GOODY! I actually like and use Ric-a-Roni. :-)
Not in our lifetime, friend.
I'm getting a new car tomorrow and I'm thinking of getting one.
Ahhh.. a sweet moment and a vivid description, thank you.
Is Levin on at 6PM eastern on WABC?
yes he is.
Yep- www.wabc.com Then click on listen live.
Am I missing something here?
Line 28, Page 10:
28.
A major focus of the Grand Jury Investigation was to determine which government officials had disclosed to the media prior to July 14, 2003 information concerning the affiliation of Valerie Wilson with the CIA
Fitzgerald said it wasn't Libby. So the major focus of the GJ investigation was NOT answered.
I have this down to a science..
What can I say, I am a talk radio junkie :)
wmc1.liquidviewer.net/wabc
If the lie must be concerning a material fact, must it not relate to some evidence that will tend to prove or disprove an element of a crime? If there was no crime of outing a covert agent, how can anything about the topic be material such that it justifies charging someone with giving false information? Would it not all be immaterial?
I am Sparta---, I mean, an alcoholic
When listening to Levin, it's just the way I roll
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1511165/posts?page=15
Libby isn't going to lie down on this...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.