1 posted on
10/28/2005 11:53:58 AM PDT by
blam
To: blam
called the idea that the first inhabitants traveled by way of a land bridge from Asia "primal racism." Too bad that archaeology is another science infected by the PC bacillius.
To: SunkenCiv
3 posted on
10/28/2005 11:57:00 AM PDT by
blam
To: blam
So, I guess the whole 'starship lifeboat crashes on virgin planet' theory gets little support in this meeting, eh?
4 posted on
10/28/2005 11:57:54 AM PDT by
ASOC
(The result of choosing between the lesser of two evils still leaves you with - evil.)
To: blam
How do they know we just did not evolve here from moonbats?
5 posted on
10/28/2005 11:58:10 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: blam
Clovis speakers discuss man's origins in the United States Didn't know there was anyone left alive that spoke Clovis.
8 posted on
10/28/2005 12:04:33 PM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Mesocons for Rice '08)
To: blam
At the meeting, sponsored in part by the University of South Carolina, Michael Collins called the idea that the first inhabitants traveled by way of a land bridge from Asia "primal racism."WTF does that mean? Sounds like a typical lefty. If you can't logically debunk your opponent's argument, call him a racist. Works every time.
11 posted on
10/28/2005 12:08:00 PM PDT by
L98Fiero
To: blam
I want reparations against "American Indians" who stole this land from my ancestors!
To: blam
Thanks for the post. I enjoy pre-Columbian history.
14 posted on
10/28/2005 12:12:07 PM PDT by
wizr
(Mentally lame duck.)
To: blam
Good article. Keep 'em coming!
Some good discoveries in the last few years. Things are getting exciting again.
16 posted on
10/28/2005 12:14:12 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: blam
Thor Heyerdahl is probably the best-known proponant of the idea of human travel and cultural exchange across the oceans in ancient times. Read more at the Link below.
Today the Reed boats that ply the Andean Lake Titicaca in Bolivia, Ancient Egypt can current day Chad proclaim that ancient man was an adventurous traveler!
Thor's Heyerdahl's Explorations
I visited the Museum in Sweden where his boats are now displayed. In the next room are Viking long boats which did discover Greenland when the last global warming took place and greenLand was named for its Greeness, (an there was no Kermit!). As near as I could tell the Viking Long boats did not add CO2 to the atmosphere!!!!
To: blam
24 posted on
10/28/2005 12:39:56 PM PDT by
Camel Joe
(Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
To: blam
27 posted on
10/28/2005 12:54:02 PM PDT by
Sam Cree
(absolute reality - Miami)
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
45 posted on
10/28/2005 11:59:56 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
To: blam
Not so much "primal racism" as "pathological isolationism". Also a strong bias against navigation by a bunch of landlubbers. :')
46 posted on
10/29/2005 12:02:07 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
47 posted on
10/29/2005 12:07:32 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
To: blam
Terrible headline....leads one to believe that Clovis language had been reconstructed.....
I wish someone had alerted me to this conference in advance. I would have attended.
That part about private collectors sharing their artifacts with archaeologists is in order. Some of my old homies in Central Kentucky have Paleoindian collections that exceed (in both quantity and quality) those of most universities and museums.
50 posted on
10/29/2005 4:43:44 AM PDT by
Renfield
(If Gene Tracy was the entertainment at your senior prom, YOU might be a redneck...)
To: blam
I always have problems with these discussions....
1.) Science always assumes the Earth today is same model for 10,000s or 100,000s years ago. Yet, they note the Earth has changed dramatically, excepting they postulate it has not changed radically since Man.
2.)Because they have found no great ships from long ago, they assume (per Darwin) that they did not exist ie; nothing was more sophisticated than the Trimene. Yet, as Barry Fell notes, Julius Caesar reports of the great Keltic ships capable of carrying several hundreds over the open oceans...Giant sailing ships defeated by the calm and the Roman grappling hooks.
3.) per 1 above, since no one can investigate Antarctica, it is assumed no civilization ever existed there. Yet, the Phoenicians had maps of the shoreline (without ice! ref; Charles Hapgood.)
So, why is it not possible that in ancient times, the ice amount on the northern hemisphere could have been massive, reducing the oceans by 100s or more feet and Antarctica could have been free of ice?
Such a possibility includes more favorable weather and seas in the south and an easier way for moving from continent to continent...
68 posted on
10/29/2005 2:14:51 PM PDT by
Prost1
(New AG, Berger is still free, copped a plea! I still get my news from FR!)
To: blam
70 posted on
11/05/2005 1:52:53 PM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson