Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/27/2005 10:22:24 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: RWR8189

BTTT


2 posted on 10/27/2005 10:26:25 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

If you doubt the degree of the left's fear of JRB, check out some of their sites today. Interesting new tactic though..People for American Way and Save Our Courts websites are obviously made by the same designer. Content is also nearly identical.
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=12566

http://saveourcourts.civilrights.org/nominees/nominees/brown.html

http://www.now.org/issues/judicial/060305-TruthBrown.html

At least NOW, who uses the same recycled character assassination, has the decency to hire their own web designer. I keep thinking of two hairy legged, left-ette web designers sitting in their "life-partner" pad thinking of new names for anti-JRB sites. Maybe we'll find out the entire left is the same person? Or maybe Teddy Kennedy (the other white meat) ate the entire moderate left movement? Anyone seen Joe Lieberman lately????


3 posted on 10/27/2005 10:29:07 AM PDT by EyeSpyHi (Really Commissioner Selig, I thought it was a healing balm....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Fred Barnes--Yet another Kool aid drinking Bushbot. (sarcasm)


4 posted on 10/27/2005 10:29:12 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
...conservatives agreed to lighten up on illegal immigrants...

Looks like Fred still doesn't get it when it comes to illegal immigration.
5 posted on 10/27/2005 10:30:15 AM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

It sounds like Fred is projecting but I hope it is true.

First question is whether Bush is still hellbent on naming a woman.

I'll once again make my darkhorse pitch for Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott. The left would look like the bullies they are trying to beat up a man in a wheelchair.


7 posted on 10/27/2005 10:33:30 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (HOUSTON ASTROS - NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONS 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Hasn't Rush been saying this for weeks, and didn't his Wall Street Journal op-ed say most of this?


8 posted on 10/27/2005 10:34:00 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Oh noooooooooooo, it might have been ugly.

What's it been till now Fred?


14 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:36 AM PDT by OldFriend (G-D IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I am pleasantly surprised by this turn of events and sincerely hope the president now appoints someone with a proven conservative track record. I also agree this is an opportunity to reunite the party. Let there be no doubt, the Republican leadership is out of touch with a large portion of their base. Yet, they really do need us, the "extreme right wing," to get elected. I expect the Dems to support their base, and they rarely disappoint. So why are we wrong to expect our leaders to support us? Do our senators and representatives actually expect to win reelection by appealing to Dems?


16 posted on 10/27/2005 10:43:27 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Democrats already have their story down: Bush capitulated to the far right in jettisoning Miers and his new nominee will be a right-wing extremist. My guess is Democrats will stick to this narrative no matter whom the president chooses from the roster of a dozen or more conservatives with strong credentials and deep experience in constitutional law.

"History will show . . . the radical right wing drove this nomination right out of town" -- Harry Reid

Boy oh boy, this is going to be even more fun to watch than the Miers lynching.

Wonder how successfully Democrats will be at using the radical right's rhetoric against the next nominee?

Can't wait for the fun to begin.  Hurry up!  Hurry up!  Name somebody!  Quick!

18 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:19 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Be what it may, there is a lot of upset conservative people out here in the free Republic. A lot angry at the president, at the republicans in congress, at republicans in general. Viewed as poor section(s) for the supreme court, no action on illegals and the borders, massive pork spending, in action in other areas. Be what it may how you feel one way or the other, the president does need to do something positive to bring all conservatives back into one camp.

Being split will only cost the congress in 2006 and potentially the WH in 08. You can think what you want, way too many Americans vote not on issues, but with their pocketbooks. Even if the president has little control over oil and gas prices, he will get the blame and the elections are where it will be felt.

The CIA scandal mess may influence some, but will be blown over by time the elections come around, especially if the president distances himself from those accused.

Americans educated in government indoctrination camps (public schools) will only remember the 30-second sound bite last night or the recent headline on the front of the scandal rags called newspapers. Few will know the details, or even bother to read the details, those that can actually read above the 3d grade level. Therefore, they will assume all are guilty, the president is at fault for all the worlds ills, democrats will fill their pockets with money for doing nothing but voting for them, etc. So, yes, the president does need to bring the conservative base back together. If it is splintered in November as badly as it is now, loss of the congress is very possible.

20 posted on 10/27/2005 10:46:50 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Socialist Dems, the MSM and Islamic murderers, ALL threats to the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
[President Bush] He'll also have Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist with him enthusiastically--and prepared to impose the "nuclear option" to shut off a Democratic filibuster if necessary.

Unfortunately I gotta disagree with you Fred. Senator Frist does not have the cojones necessary to herd the Republican RINOS. Thus I fear we'll never see the passage of the Constitutional Option, which is a shame. We really do need that.

23 posted on 10/27/2005 10:50:05 AM PDT by upchuck (Seen it all, done it all. Unfortunately, remember very little of it. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Fred Barnes is on target!


27 posted on 10/27/2005 10:54:30 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Freddy "the Beatle" Barnes left out one thing. One Very important thing.


The rejection of Miers by conservatives, makes McAnus, and Grahams position as members of the Gang of 14 untenable if McAnus has Presidential Aspirations, and W only needs two to go Nukular.


28 posted on 10/27/2005 10:57:40 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you dont have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

If I understand the withdrawl reasons right, then this effectively nukes Alberto Gonzolez, too, as a potenital high court nominee. A two-fer.


33 posted on 10/27/2005 11:04:47 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I agree with everything Barnes wrote. I just hope Pres. Bush is smart enough to go this course.


34 posted on 10/27/2005 11:08:06 AM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Being a very spiteful man, if I were Bush, having been gutted by my own party, I would assign Traitor Kerry to come up with a nominee.

Then if Rove and Libby were indicted and considering that more than half of the citizens of this "once" great Country are now against the War, I would call ALL of our Troops home.

I would wait until I could give Rove and Libby a Presidential Pardon and then I would walk out to the Rose Garden and tell the American people that........... they can all KMA while they fight the terrorists in their own streets. Then, I would go fishing.............


46 posted on 10/27/2005 11:54:36 AM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Ok, tinfoil hat time...

Think about this. What if this was the plan all along?

President Bush has been losing support from the conservative base for a long time. The border issue has pushed a lot of us away from the Republican party (I no longer give any money to them), and they needed a way to get us back into the fold.

Now, the Prez pulls this crap with nominating a woman for SCOTUS who has no real qualifications for the job other than being his friend and having a vagina. Oh, and let's not forget all of her liberal speeches and writings, not to mention the fact that she gave money to Gore and Clinton. The conservative base is now totally put off, and wants nothing more to do with this administration, or perhaps even the Republican party.

The conservatives stew for a while. We do everything we can to get the nomination to be pulled, but to no avail for almost an entire month.

Suddenly, out of the blue, the Prez starts talking tough about illegal immigration. Wow! None of us expected that! But, there it was. He finally came out against illegals. Sure, we won't believe it until we see some action that doesn't involve amnesty, but at least he said something. Days later, the nomintaion of Harriet Meirs is withdrawn. Suddenly, we are pulling together. The Bush bashing has stopped. The conservatives are happy and are ready to work with our party again.

Absolutely masterful. By the '06 elections, we will all be solidly behind the Republicans again. I, for one, am very happy to now have a party I can get behind.

Just an opinion, as I am not one of the tinfoil hat crowd. But, this certainly smacks of a conspiracy to get us conservatives back to the Republican party where we belong.

47 posted on 10/27/2005 11:57:33 AM PDT by America_Right (I serve the cause of freedom. What do you do? -SECDEF Heller from "24")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
How will this affect the Supreme Court? Chances are the successor to O'Conner will now be the real thing, a justice with unequivocally conservative leanings who tilts the ideological balance of the court to the right. Whether Miers would have had the same impact we'll never know.

If Fred means the next nominee, then he could be right.

If he means the "successor to O'Connor," then he's in a dream world. Rinos will not permit a real conservative on the court. JMHO.

49 posted on 10/27/2005 12:04:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Who's your pick, Fred? Or are you just going to wait and criticize?


50 posted on 10/27/2005 12:06:47 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Whether Miers would have had the same impact we'll never know.

This is just a hunch mind you, but if Miers had been confirmed, I think we might have had the first SCOTUS Bowling Team in U.S. history.

Okay, okay. I know that was bad, I'll stop.

[ However, I had heard rumors that Souter throws a mean 'back up' ball. ]
Okay, now I'm done :-)

55 posted on 10/27/2005 1:06:48 PM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson