Here's my contribution to the post-Miers discussion. Whether it is Judge Brown or some other woman judge, I feel strongly that this time the President will not make any effort to avoid a fight, but will put up a hard-wired judicial conservative.
John / Billybob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Congressman Billybob
Word is that they want someone already vetted and the odds are for McConnell.
2 posted on
10/27/2005 10:22:53 AM PDT by
saveliberty
(I did not break the feed. I may have lost it, but I did not break the feed.)
To: Congressman Billybob
3 posted on
10/27/2005 10:23:51 AM PDT by
Guenevere
To: Congressman Billybob
Awesome. Please God let it happen.
4 posted on
10/27/2005 10:24:47 AM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Congressman Billybob
Death by a thousand cuts ? more like nibbled to death by ducks.
5 posted on
10/27/2005 10:25:09 AM PDT by
stylin19a
To: Congressman Billybob
Why is everybody so hell bent on having a woman on the court. I thought we wanted the "Best Qualified" person for the job.
Sounds like a quota thing to me, but that's just me.
6 posted on
10/27/2005 10:25:26 AM PDT by
unixfox
(AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
To: Congressman Billybob
Next nominee: Hillary Clinton
7 posted on
10/27/2005 10:25:45 AM PDT by
medscribe
To: Congressman Billybob
Some of you were here in 1992, when the last Amendment one that came from the hand of James Madison was declared ratified by Congress. 1992? Have I missed something?
9 posted on
10/27/2005 10:29:16 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Congressman Billybob
Time to get the traitors 9 aside and threaten to remove them from any committee or leadership position and make them jump if necessary.
12 posted on
10/27/2005 10:32:29 AM PDT by
boomop1
To: Congressman Billybob
http://img.slate.msn.com/media/1/123125/2065970/2114372/2118551/050511_N1_JudgeJudy_tn.jpg I am a woman with plenty of bench experience and a lengthy paper trail. Maybe not the best qualified, but HEY I'm a woman !
15 posted on
10/27/2005 10:33:14 AM PDT by
AbeKrieger
(Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
To: Congressman Billybob
From your pen to GWB's ear. Or something like that.
16 posted on
10/27/2005 10:33:28 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Congressman Billybob
I feel strongly that this time the President will not make any effort to avoid a fight, but will put up a hard-wired judicial conservative.If he doesn't, and goes for another non-entity, his base will abandon him.
20 posted on
10/27/2005 10:36:46 AM PDT by
Oatka
(Hyphenated-Americans have hyphenated-loyalties -- Victor Davis Hanson)
To: Congressman Billybob; XJarhead
John, do you think JRB will be filibustered? Do you think the 'Rats and moderate Republicans will have 51 votes to defeat the "nucular" option?
If the answer to both questions is "yes", what is the point of starting a fight that we'll lose?
21 posted on
10/27/2005 10:36:47 AM PDT by
You Dirty Rats
(Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: Glub Glub Glub)
To: Congressman Billybob
I am Woman. Hear Me Roar. Senators, I Am Too Big To Ignore.
To: Congressman Billybob
We're on the same page Billybob. Excellent contribution, as per usual. Let's just hope this or something like it reaches the proper eyes and hearts.
Nam Vet
25 posted on
10/27/2005 10:41:53 AM PDT by
Nam Vet
("I was present at the birth of a political jihad.")
To: Congressman Billybob
From your mouth to God's ears.
I have already posted my thoughts on why JRB would be an excellenet strategic choice for Bush to make:
It'd be good poker of the highest order as
1) It'd force the Dems to attack a black female
2) Who was re-elected by large margins in the well-known bastion of right-wing extremism known as Kah-lee-four-nyah.
3) Who they have voted for mere months ago to confirm to a seat on the D.C. Circuit Court.
1 and 2 just make them look bad when they attack.
3 makes them look either stupid or hypocritical; they'll make verbal pretzels in the air explaining why she suddenly became a maybe from a yes.
27 posted on
10/27/2005 10:42:33 AM PDT by
George Smiley
(This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
To: Congressman Billybob
I don't think the President or the Republican party can depend on any Republican in Congress to show any backbone and fight for the Presidents nomination.
30 posted on
10/27/2005 10:43:59 AM PDT by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Congressman Billybob
Whether it is Judge Brown or some other woman judge, I feel strongly that this time the President will not make any effort to avoid a fight, but will put up a hard-wired judicial conservative.
Interesting take but I have a different view. I think the President will take the pragmatic approach and nominate someone that will be supported by at least enough of a mix from both sides of the aisle that confirmation will be secured without a knock down fight.
JMO and obviously yours differs.
31 posted on
10/27/2005 10:44:06 AM PDT by
deport
To: Congressman Billybob
Bush already has one RINO confirmed, appointed another one, and the next one will be one too.. Why?.. Rinoisimus Maximus is the name and the son of "read my lips" is the game.. thats why the boy is goin for a Dame..
37 posted on
10/27/2005 10:46:46 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
To: Congressman Billybob
why doesn't someone bring up that maybe the best nominee would be someone withOUT judicial, or even legal experience? the vast majority of the people here would make a better justice than many "qualified" potentials. it would be a "common sense" approach to the constitution, reading what it says, not looking for other meanings to create an interpretation to fit what's expediant.
41 posted on
10/27/2005 10:53:25 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: Congressman Billybob
Remarkably, her judicial philosophy puts her even further to the right than the most far-right justices now sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. In August, People For the American Way and the NAACP released a joint report opposing Brown's confirmation. In recent weeks, her nomination has met increasing opposition, both in her home state and nationally, from groups including the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the Alliance for Justice, AFL-CIO, Alliance for Retired Americans, Americans for Democratic Action, Feminist Majority, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., NARAL Pro-Choice America, National Bar Association, National Council of Jewish Women, National Organization for Women, National Senior Citizens Law Center, National Women's Law Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, Planned Parenthood, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, and the Sierra Club. Brown's confirmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee has been scheduled for Wednesday, October 22.
from people of the American way.........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson