Skip to comments.
To Moderators
Personal Opinion
| 10/27/2005
| Frenetic
Posted on 10/27/2005 8:10:14 AM PDT by Frenetic
This is just my opinion. If a thread I post is pulled, I would appreciate an explanation, so I know what it is that required it to be pulled, as to not do it again. I'd rather play by the rules than waste my time.
I posted an excerpt of an opinion piece by Peggy Noonan from WSJ "A Separate Peace - America is in trouble - and our elites are merely resigned. " which disapeared without explanation. I didn't think I violated the "terms of use" or "privacy policy" within WSJ. If I am incorrect, please let me know. Thanks
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cz; footnmouth; unlawfulsearch; whineandcheese; zot; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2005 8:10:16 AM PDT
by
Frenetic
To: Frenetic
It was already posted, but I do think an explanation is a nice thing.
2
posted on
10/27/2005 8:11:03 AM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Tony Schaffer is a hero)
To: Bahbah
I second that, I have had it done many times. I know for sure that if it is a duplicate thread, it gets pulled usually.
3
posted on
10/27/2005 8:12:02 AM PDT
by
Mike10542
To: Frenetic
The search function is our friend.
To: Bahbah
That makes sense. Thanks. I'll check first before posting from now on.
5
posted on
10/27/2005 8:13:15 AM PDT
by
Frenetic
To: WilliamWallace1999
not always....its a temper-mental friend....very moody.
6
posted on
10/27/2005 8:13:39 AM PDT
by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: WilliamWallace1999
7
posted on
10/27/2005 8:15:17 AM PDT
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< Like $3 a gallon gas? Thank an enviromentalist.)
To: Bahbah
It would be nice if I won the PCH sweeps, the moderator has plenty to do without baby sitting posters. People want to be first at posts but still need to search, that's the game and the rules.
8
posted on
10/27/2005 8:16:00 AM PDT
by
boomop1
To: wallcrawlr
That is true. If it can have a google like search capability it would be much easier. As well, I am a little cinfused by the "terms of use" or "privacy policy" with newspapers. Where can I go to get more info on this?
9
posted on
10/27/2005 8:16:34 AM PDT
by
bubman
To: Frenetic
Generally, mods do explain pulls.
The one in question shows "duplicate" as the reason, and provides a link to the earlier post.
To: Bahbah; WilliamWallace1999; Jersey Republican Biker Chick
That doesn't explain why they pulled several of my posts touting new hardcore porn sites with links and photos. I USED search and nothing came up.
Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
11
posted on
10/27/2005 8:17:07 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Admin Moderator
12
posted on
10/27/2005 8:17:54 AM PDT
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< Like $3 a gallon gas? Thank an enviromentalist.)
To: Frenetic
That makes sense. Thanks. I'll check first before posting from now on.
That doesn't always work especially if it is from a different source than the one posted as other sources often change the title... But searching for a string of title words will help bring it forward if it's been posted. Good luck.
13
posted on
10/27/2005 8:18:35 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Owl_Eagle
14
posted on
10/27/2005 8:18:40 AM PDT
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< Like $3 a gallon gas? Thank an enviromentalist.)
To: Owl_Eagle
That doesn't explain why they pulled several of my posts touting new hardcore porn sites with links and photos. I USED search and nothing came up. Those features are only available to FR Premium™ subscribers.
15
posted on
10/27/2005 8:18:46 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(Thank you... I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress. (And try the veal!))
To: Owl_Eagle
Silly Owl-Eagle, you know www.spankmehard.com requires excerpting.
16
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:34 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
To: Owl_Eagle
That doesn't explain why they pulled several of my posts touting new hardcore porn sites with links and photos. I USED search and nothing came up.
17
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:41 AM PDT
by
TheBigB
(<----cooler than the other side of the pillow.)
To: bubman
18
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:58 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
The one in question shows "duplicate" as the reason, and provides a link to the earlier post.
Oh. Nevermind.
19
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:02 AM PDT
by
evets
(God bless president Bush!)
To: Owl_Eagle
That doesn't explain why they pulled several of my posts touting new hardcore porn sites with links and photos.Self-advertising is not allowed.
20
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:07 AM PDT
by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson