Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Time to buy?
1 posted on 10/27/2005 7:19:21 AM PDT by sumocide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sumocide

Woo-Hoo! I predict a stock split in my future! :)


2 posted on 10/27/2005 7:20:18 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

Some of this does not make sense.

I'm all for market-based profits, but it must be a truly free market. It mustn't be interfered with by labor, management, or government.

Cartels, deals, schemes, or price controls are not a "free market."


3 posted on 10/27/2005 7:25:28 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

My grandaddy was a wise man. Thanks Grandaddy!


6 posted on 10/27/2005 7:40:54 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (If you want to be on my Civil Engineer ping list, just say so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide
Supply and demand, market at work??? When supply is controlled by a handful of people, demand becomes an orphan.

Would be capitalists here seem not to understand that.

11 posted on 10/27/2005 8:40:57 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

When the price of ____ goes up ____, then those who sell ____ will reap greater profits.


21 posted on 10/27/2005 1:42:00 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (No more crony picks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

These obscene profits are the equivalent of an 8.4% return per share. Ghastly horrid greedy. NOT.


23 posted on 10/27/2005 2:01:51 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

Exxon will use the profit to invest in more oil and natural gas development, and to upgrade refineries. That's their business, and that is what they do. Do we want to take the profits, call them windfall, and not have them available to develop petroleum resources? Is Hillary series about crippling the industry and giving us real oil problems?


24 posted on 10/27/2005 2:05:27 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

Hooray for Exxon Mobile! F-ck Bill O'Reilly (not even my neighbor's dog would want to).


36 posted on 10/27/2005 3:14:40 PM PDT by Clemenza (Gentlemen, Behold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide

What is the actual ROS involved with these numbers?


41 posted on 10/28/2005 4:29:00 AM PDT by CSM (When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide
"State and local gas tax collections exceed oil industry profits by a large margin, according to a Tax Foundation study released last week. Since 1977, consumers have paid $1.34 trillion in gas taxes - more than twice the profits of all major U.S. oil companies combined during that same period. Last year, state and federal gas taxes took in $58.4 billion. Major U.S. oil company profits last year totaled $42.6 billion."

- New Hampshire Union Leader, 10/30/05

42 posted on 10/31/2005 8:15:43 AM PST by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide
Excluding a gain of $1.62 billion from restructuring its stake in a Dutch gas transportation business, earnings were $1.32 per share. On that basis, analysts' average forecast was $1.39, according to Reuters Estimates.

They missed the analysts estimate so this is a bad thing. They were expected to make even more money.

43 posted on 10/31/2005 8:18:24 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sumocide
THE Recently wed Mr. Exxon and former Ms.Mobil speak up---

The happy couple are proud to announce that their combined income has reached record heights and is the talk of the town.

Prior to their marriage both were considered only "above average income" folks.

Neighbors have been heard to say -- "This isn't fair" and urged they be forcibly divorced so each can return to their earlier , less remarkable status.

44 posted on 10/31/2005 8:23:53 AM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson