Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Withdraws Supreme Court Nomination
Yahoo/AP ^ | 10/27/05 | Yahoo News/AP

Posted on 10/27/2005 6:09:25 AM PDT by procomone

WASHINGTON - Harriet Miers withdrew her nomination to be a Supreme Court justice Thursday in the face of stiff opposition and mounting criticism about her qualifications.

Bush said he reluctantly accepted her decision to withdraw, after weeks of insisting that he did not want her to step down. He blamed her withdrawal on calls in the Senate for the release of internal White House documents that the administration has insisted were protected by executive privilege.

"It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House — disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel," Bush said. "Harriet Miers' decision demonstrates her deep respect for this essential aspect of the constitutional separation of powers — and confirms my deep respect and admiration for her."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: checkbreaking; crony; cronyism; miers; officemommy; patronage; search; spolissystem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 421-426 next last
To: conservativecorner

I trust President Bush! Something I have done for 13 years since he has been in the political arena.

I don't really care what you think.


121 posted on 10/27/2005 6:37:57 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Stirner

You've nailed it. This withdrawl makes nomination of internal administration "trust me" cronies impossible.


122 posted on 10/27/2005 6:37:57 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Frank T

"Gonzales? You mean he wants to go through this whole thing again?"

After the shameful treatment of Miers, the table has been set for an all-out borking of any controversial nominee -- by either side. I can't imagine a dignified public servant who would be willing to go through that now that civility has been destroyed again. At least Gonzalez has been up for this before and would have some defense against it for that reason.


123 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:07 AM PDT by USPatriette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: USPatriette

No one assassinated her CHARACTER; it was her qualifications or the lack thereof. Have a nice day!


124 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:21 AM PDT by no dems (43 muscles to smile, 17 to frown, two to pull a trigger; I'm lazy and tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wita

Actually, I supported her until yesterday. I heard about the speeches and since I'm a female attorney, I know the culture of the women's bar associations (I won't belong). The trouble is, it is near impossible to become a judge without sucking up to this power group so a conservative woman (I know, why a woman but politically it may be necessary) will be hard to find. BTW, the IOLTA trust account flap was totally bogus. Freepmail if you want to know why.


125 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:31 AM PDT by Mercat (God loves us where He finds us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
[Dirty little secret is that the libs in the senate really can't stomach the fight that's coming.]



IF the President nominates a clear "strict" justice with an equally clear record, and

IF the President and all (or nearly all) of the Republicans unify to fight for her when the Democrats try to destroy him/her, then

WE WIN.




But those are two big IFs.
126 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:37 AM PDT by spinestein (Forget the Golden Rule. Remember the Brazen Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
[Dirty little secret is that the libs in the senate really can't stomach the fight that's coming.]



IF the President nominates a clear "strict" justice with an equally clear record, and

IF the President and all (or nearly all) of the Republicans unify to fight for her when the Democrats try to destroy him/her, then

WE WIN.




But those are two big IFs.
127 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:38 AM PDT by spinestein (Forget the Golden Rule. Remember the Brazen Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: procomone
He blamed her withdrawal on calls in the Senate for the release of internal White House documents that the administration has insisted were protected by executive privilege.

The "Krauthammer Solution".

I hope everyone will exercise a little restraint in their comments over the few days, but I know that's just wishful thinking. This is no time for gloating by Miers' opponents nor recriminations from her supporters.

The fate of the US Constitution and the continued survival of the Republic is literally hanging in the balance pending the next series of moves by President Bush and our other leaders. What is needed right now is prayer and thoughtful reflection, not partisan fireworks.

128 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:38 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Then you are in the minority. They are still delusional that Rov v Wade can ever be overturned and are letting this cloud their minds.


129 posted on 10/27/2005 6:39:31 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: procomone
Note to Bush...one name above all:

Kenneth Starr

130 posted on 10/27/2005 6:39:42 AM PDT by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Gene Tracy was a comedian from Oklahoma who was popular in the 70's. Most of his routines are too vulgar to discuss here....but you ought to look into him, if only to be exposed to a piece of Americana to which you are oblivious.

http://www.genetracy.com/


131 posted on 10/27/2005 6:39:49 AM PDT by Renfield (If Gene Tracy was the entertainment at your senior prom, YOU might be a redneck...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: alnick
"Nice job of character assassination, y'all."

You're welcome!

If character assassination is what it takes to prevent the least-qualified candidate imaginable to take a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court, well, character assassination it is!

132 posted on 10/27/2005 6:39:56 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: goushi

Be careful what you wish for, I think Bush's next nominee will be even more to the CENTER...can you say, "Gonzales?"

-

JANICE ROGERS BROWN


133 posted on 10/27/2005 6:40:40 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (There's nothing sarcastic in this post. Sure there isn't. Not one bit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Frank T
You can't mean that, I have to believe you are running on too much caffeine to grasp the full impact of your statement.. Then again, maybe not.. Interesting times ahead fir sir..
134 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:18 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BurtSB

"Janice Roger Brown is not a conservative !
she is a libertarian !
she has very liberal views on social issues and abortion etc...."

I have no idea if what you say re: her views on abortion are true, but if so, I would assume it's a person opinion. As a libertarian, she would use her position of power to be used as a hyper-legislative body, and I believe she'd return the issue to where it belongs - in either the state of federal legislatures.


135 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:31 AM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I think what they did to this woman was just plain evil and is indicative of worse things to come... just wait.... you'll see.


136 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:51 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no dems

No one assassinated her CHARACTER; it was her qualifications or the lack thereof. Have a nice day!


YOU my friend are wrong. Ann Coulter said Ms. Miers was nothing more than a highly over paid secretary, she said she was like having the cleaning lady sent to S.C. Many of us were turned off by the demands of the likes of Ann Coulter. I will have a good day, but find it a shame that people in my own party can be so turn coat and so demanding in their own temper tantrums.


137 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:54 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

"The president now has to deal from a position of weakness knowing that whomever he selects was not his first choice for the job."

I know Freepers will know this...wasn't Scalia a "second choice" nomination? Not sure...


138 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:09 AM PDT by Keith (now more than ever...it's about the judges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

A strict originalist will overturn Roe. We've had quite enough of judges legislating from the bench.


139 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:21 AM PDT by gogeo (Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: alnick

That's how I feel too. I think what they did to this lady was evil and wrong.


140 posted on 10/27/2005 6:42:25 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 421-426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson