Facts are troubling things. Miers' involvement in IOLTA; her mediocre writing [what little there was of it]; her 1993 speech; her views of "self-determination"; her choice of Janet Reno and Justice Ginsburg as "role models"; her unsuitable answers in her senate meetings; and her general unsuitability to become a justice of the SCOTUS because her background has not prepared her for the rigorous requirements [in the 21st century] of that position ... while not, necessarily a crime [if you discount IOLTA] ... are not baseless accusations.
It's over. Let's move on.
They were baseless accusations when they were made before the hearings ever started. It is EXACTLY like being framed for a crime. Try again.
Yes it's over.
Until the next "wrong" nominee comes up.