Skip to comments.
ATTN U.S. ATTORNEYS IN PENNSYSLVANIA - You only have until 12-31-05 to indict Governor Ed Rendell
HillCAP.org ^
| 10-26-05
| DFU
Posted on 10/26/2005 4:19:30 PM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: doug from upland
go get the SOB, and all his horses too
2
posted on
10/26/2005 4:23:31 PM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: doug from upland
Why would anybody run up their phone bill? Don't you know he's a Democrat and exempt from the laws that apply to the peons and to elected Republicans? No one appointed by the Bush administration is going to prosecute or even say anything bad about any Democrat who has done something illegal. Where have you been for the last 5 yrs?
3
posted on
10/26/2005 4:29:23 PM PDT
by
penowa
To: penowa
I have an idea. Sit them and don't do anything. That always works.
4
posted on
10/26/2005 4:32:54 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
To: doug from upland
E-mails will be forwarded to the responsible Department of Justice component for appropriate handling.
E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to :
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.
5
posted on
10/26/2005 4:38:58 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: Mo1; Tribune7
6
posted on
10/26/2005 4:40:53 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(If you can't say somethin nice about someone you must be talking about Hillary Clinton)
To: doug from upland
Forget Marino. He was indicted yesterday for corruption.
7
posted on
10/26/2005 4:41:27 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(If you can't say somethin nice about someone you must be talking about Hillary Clinton)
To: hipaatwo
Never mind. Different Marino. My bad.
8
posted on
10/26/2005 4:42:07 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(If you can't say somethin nice about someone you must be talking about Hillary Clinton)
To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..
9
posted on
10/26/2005 5:00:46 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: doug from upland
10
posted on
10/26/2005 5:03:16 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: doug from upland
Sorry, but it looks to me like nothing works. Name me one Democrat who has gotten worse than a slap on the wrist in the past 5 yrs. and I'll start doing all that futile dialing I used to do. I never got any of my calls returned either when I used to do that.
11
posted on
10/26/2005 5:38:13 PM PDT
by
penowa
To: doug from upland
I brought this to the attention of my friend, the Harrisburg reporter for KYW in Philly. He said he was aware of it but wouldn't follow it up because he doesn't want to lose his credentials.
Yup, the Democratic system is working in PA, for the Dems.
Thanks for the info. But I don't see anything this (me) little pee-on can do.
12
posted on
10/26/2005 7:11:27 PM PDT
by
AGreatPer
(Love $5 Pitchers)
To: doug from upland
Doug, I will drive by the RNC here in Harrisburg in the next few days, give them a copy of this and see how they respond. You would think they would be interested.
99.9% of the world have not heard of this before. How on earth do you know this?
13
posted on
10/26/2005 7:17:36 PM PDT
by
AGreatPer
(Love $5 Pitchers (The Pirates own them all))
To: doug from upland
OK, I just read the clincher.
"Further investigation by the Justice Department and the Senate Ethics Committee is required to determine the full extent to which Hillary's campaign and DNC leaders may have misled federal investigators and obstructed justice"
Say no more, the damn Bush Administration will do nothing with this.
14
posted on
10/26/2005 7:23:35 PM PDT
by
AGreatPer
(Love $5 Pitchers (The Pirates own them all))
To: AGreatPer
I really hate to be cynical but I wonder if those FBI files have anything to do with all this cover up for the Demos.
Bush 41 would not say anything about Clinton even after Clinton undercut Bush 43. Bush 41 defended Clinton.
It may be that 41 does not agree with 42. Many of his cabinet and advisers have disagreed with many of Bush 43's
policies.
15
posted on
10/26/2005 7:57:58 PM PDT
by
frannie
(Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
To: Tribune7
16
posted on
10/26/2005 8:57:48 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: AGreatPer
I am working with Peter Paul and a very experienced filmmaker on a documentary about Hillary's campaign finance fraud in 2000. She failed to declare a minimum of $1.2 million. We were hoping to have it ready this month for the film festival in L.A. but are way behind. We are trying for Spring. Look for -- INDICTING HILLARY.
17
posted on
10/26/2005 9:22:59 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
To: AGreatPer
The reporter is afraid? Would Rendell have his credentials yanked?
18
posted on
10/26/2005 9:46:58 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
To: doug from upland
I know Doug quite well you are working on this. I have been following it. "$1.2 million"
$1.6 million ?
$2 million ?
I hope you have your act together on how much in the movie.
It looks like Rendell is gonna skate on the measly $30 thousand. Such a shame.
Rendell is such a scumb. It starts with ruining the Philadelphia School system to the Don and Terri Adams case.
Now they are diverting money through the new PA State Casinos to Demos to support them in the future. It is being done indirectly and legally. It is a real mess here.
19
posted on
10/26/2005 9:58:30 PM PDT
by
AGreatPer
(Love $5 Pitchers (The Pirates own them all))
To: AGreatPer
The government acknowledge $1.2 million in the trial of Rosen. Peter Paul presented the government with $1.6 million worth of receipts. Peter says that what he actually spent was close to $2 mil. For the film, we may well go with the government's numbers in the Rosen trial, even though we know that is low.
Peter did not know until recently that Rendell never declared the money. It looks as if we have an attorney general who doesn't want to indict DemocRATS. Just our side will get hammered. We control the government, and look is what is happening to the party in charge. Just amazing.
The attorney general has seen Peter's documents implicating Hillary. They are apparently afraid to pull the trigger. I don't understand it.
20
posted on
10/26/2005 10:36:10 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson