.40 vs .45 LAW ENFORCEMENT USE

[bramdawg]

Going onto a local PD in los angeles area. Have heard stories both about .40's and .45's what is really the difference. I know comfort is important put I want to know if I will be safe with a .40 or if I should go with .45. I want the best gun for my job.

[Lion Den Dan]

You really opened a can of worms with that question.

I immagine the department will tell you what to carry. The 40 will probably serve you as well as a .45 though the .45 is my prefrence after 40+ years experience with it. Good results wiith either caliber depends greatly where you put the bullet. In a gun fight, there is no caliber that makes you safe.

[spetznaz]

May you be safe and effective in you career, and God bless you and yours.

[Jokelahoma]

Hoo, boy! You'll get lots of opinions on this one. Bottom line, it comes down to whichever you're most comfortable with, and whichever you can control. You could carry a cannon in your holster, and it wouldn't make any difference if you couldn't control it and hit what you aim at. So shoot both at the range, if they'll allow it. Shoot as many rounds through each as possible, with as many different guns as possible, keeping in mind that certain departments may only allow certain guns. Then make your decision based on that.

[jec1ny]

Most departments have policies on what you will carry. A few however still allow officers the choice. If I was on the job and given the choice, I would opt for a .357 mag revolver(yes a 6 shot wheel gun) and load with 125 grain hollow points (.357 rounds not .38 special). I know a lot of people will say you need the extra magazine capacity of a semi. But I disagree. If you can't hit your target with 6 rounds you have no business carrying a gun. And there is no semi that has the stopping power of a .357 mag. You can shoot someone with a 9mm or .40 cal and yes even the much vaunted .45 several times and not bring them down. But you hit someone with a 357 mag and promise you they will immediately desist in whatever anti-social behavior they were engaged in.

[nerdwithamachinegun]

Shot placement is vastly more important than caliber.

Handguns are a horrible tradeoff of power for portability.

Don't worry about caliber. Use what you can hit with.

I'm sure the mathematicians and statisticians will be along shortly.

[cannonball]

"And there is no semi that has the stopping power of a .357 mag."

Ever heard of the .357 SIG?

[Jaysun]

Pick whichever you can shoot the straightest, or feel most comfortable using. I don't think they're far enough apart to otherwise matter.

[muir_redwoods]

Learn to shoot as well as you can and either caliber will serve you well, Fail to learn and neither will. Shot placement is what matters. If you have that mastered then it's a matter of which one feels best in your hand and points most naturally.

[jec1ny]

Follow up to my previous post (5). If your limited in your selection to either a 45 or a .40 you could really go either way. Comfort will dictate a lot and your ability to use the weapon effectively. I personally think the .45 is the on;y semi I have any real use for, but then again I am not on the job. There are arguments for both. The .45 probably would give you slightly better stopping power at the expense of magazine capacity and accuracy at longer range. The inverse is true for the.40 caliber. Other issues would include what kind of community are you going to be working in etc. I am not a fan of hand guns for gun fights. A shotgun is my first choice. As you can see I am a fan of stopping power. I tend to believe in using the most immediately effective (stopping power) weapon that your able to carry comfortably and handle effectively. Hence my preference for the .357 mag. But there are a host of issues that relate to your job that I don't have to deal with. But in simple terms thats my advice. Find out what weapons they will let you carry. Then figure out which ones you are able to carry comfortably and use with proficiency, and then if you have more than one choice opt for the one with the most stopping power.

[Zeroisanumber]

In my experience a .40 tends to kick a bit more than a .45, possibly from a higher powder load. If I remember my rudimentary training correctly a .40 has a load of 1360-or so grains vs. 1140 for a .45. From my experience, they seem to do about the same amount of damage to a target but since I haven't shot any humans I don't know how well each would work on a man. :)

I'd say that you should go with whatever has the higher capacity; when you get into the size range of .40 and up I don't think that stopping power is really an issue. I just wouldn't want to die for lack of shooting back.

Good luck with your new job and keep safe.

[jec1ny]

"Ever heard of the .357 SIG?"

Yes I have. And I know at least one friend who loves it. But my (admittedly limited) experience with it did not leave me ultra impressed. I found it a bit unwieldy. Also I have read that it is more prone to mechanical issues than its revolver counterparts and does not have quite the same muzzle velocity and stopping power. I would certainly not disparage it as an effective weapon. But it would not be my 1st choice based on my limited exp and what I have read on it.

[Americanwolf]

on the note of the .357 sig... sig sauer 226.. I belive will do a beatiful double tap at 25 yards..

[glock rocks]

I want the best gun for my job.

If you want a gun, get a 12 ga.

Or were you considering a pistol?

If you're not just trolling this political forum and are asking a serious question, go here.

[jec1ny]

What an awesome site! Thanx for that link.

[irishtenor]

Get whatever one holds the most bullets.

[quietolong]

Go with the 1911 .45 It has more knock down power But walls will stop it easier. Were the .40 will go through to hit who knows what. Everyone misses sometime.

The SW .40 was nothing more that the government showing how it take a 10mm cut it down, and waste a pile of money for something it did not need.

The .40 is nothing new. the Cowboys had them too. But people just don’t read there history. The US went from using the LC .45 to the .38 Went to the Philippines. found out the .38 didn’t do the job. Got the old Colt .45s out and developed the 1911

Fast F to the 80s All the PD & the military had to get new bad toys. And went out and got all those 9mm Which is basically the same as a .38 What did they find out. She just
don’t get the job done. But the government is never wrong. Right /s They couldn’t say we should have gone with the 1911 They needed to spend a whole lot of tax money for something new.
They first looked at the new bret 10mm But that was too much power. So it was cut down into the SW .40 When all they had to do was go with the good old .45 auto.

It’s sad that even after Golf I It was seen the 9mm was junk. and everyone asked to keep the 1911 They still use that 9mm crap.

[R. Scott]

I know a lot of people will say you need the extra magazine capacity of a semi. But I disagree. If you can't hit your target with 6 rounds you have no business carrying a gun.

Also, with 18 or so rounds available and the ability to quickly reload there is the tendency to just lay a base of fire (spray and pray) and not actually try to hit the bad guy. Very bad for the neighborhood.