Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indictments Coming Tomorrow; Targets Received Letters Today (Latest Lib Rumor)
thewashingtonnote.com ^ | October 25, 2005 | Steve Clemons

Posted on 10/25/2005 3:06:54 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

An uber-insider source has just reported the following to TWN:

1. 1-5 indictments are being issued. The source feels that it will be towards the higher end.

2. The targets of indictment have already received their letters.

3. The indictments will be sealed indictments and "filed" tomorrow.

4. A press conference is being scheduled for Thursday.

The shoe is dropping.

More soon.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcfraud; abcleaks; cialeak; fishing; fitzgerald; fitzmas; frogmarch; hillarysbirthday; leakyleaks; plame; plamegame; plugtheleak; rover; rovian; rumors; russert; spittleball; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-269 next last
To: the_Watchman

I thought the SP said Miller would not be a target, they just wanted her to testify.


201 posted on 10/25/2005 5:14:28 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

no, no mention of that - yet.

but you can bet if Libby is indicted, the left will use that term to apply to Cheney.


202 posted on 10/25/2005 5:16:37 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Rokurota
By "thing", do you mean a Clintonesque type of thing?

According to Maureen Dowd's column, Miller has had several "things" over the years. Just part of the job, I guess.
203 posted on 10/25/2005 5:19:55 PM PDT by hummingbird (Think I'll google for a while.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

All that rhetoric does is justify a charge of civil contempt against Cooper, Miller, etc. for not testifying.


204 posted on 10/25/2005 5:20:54 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Doesn't matter, it's illegal to leak from a GJ ...

Witnesses and targets can talk all they want. It's the jurors and DA who are bound to confidentiality.

205 posted on 10/25/2005 5:21:54 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear
Where did that come from; your imagination or some tinfoil suited up DUer ?
206 posted on 10/25/2005 5:27:38 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rokurota

LOL


207 posted on 10/25/2005 5:28:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

No, witnesses can talk about their OWN testimony. The lawyers aren't even in the hearing room.


208 posted on 10/25/2005 5:33:15 PM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

bttt


209 posted on 10/25/2005 5:33:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Pincus, Corn, Joe, Valerie, Judy Miller, Russert.


210 posted on 10/25/2005 5:36:32 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Likely:

Miller - I'm guessing for perjury
Libby - I'm guessing for perjury or maybe for the actual leak

Possible:

Wilson - Could be indicted for anything (obs of just, perjury, leaking, etc)
Rove - Could be for perjury with the multiple grand jury appearances... somehow I think he's clean, though
Russert - a leaker? and also maybe Cooper - another leaker?
The Mysterious Mr. X - For the actual leak (Mr. X could be Wilson himself and/or Novak's source, or Novak himself, or a NYT editor.. impossible to predict)


211 posted on 10/25/2005 5:39:05 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Where did you all FIRST hear that Valerie Plame was an "UNDERCOVER" AGENT???

Where everybody did. On the "Today Show" by none other than JOE WILSON. He is MR. X......

Nobody knew, even from Novak's column, that she was undercover, which she might not really be since it had been over 5 years since she had "supposedly" had an assignment overseas.


212 posted on 10/25/2005 5:40:03 PM PDT by nightowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

It reads like "The Days of Our Lives, 1992- 2000," doesn't it?


213 posted on 10/25/2005 5:44:26 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: 12chachacha

Yes? What did it say?


214 posted on 10/25/2005 5:53:35 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
No, witnesses can talk about their OWN testimony.

That would be all they know, no?

The lawyers aren't even in the hearing room.

So?

215 posted on 10/25/2005 5:57:12 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear
They forgot Barney too.

Heck, what about Beasley? You know what a sneaky little loudmouth that pup is.

216 posted on 10/25/2005 5:59:12 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (I could care less if the Gitmo prisoners got force-fed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Who was the counter?


217 posted on 10/25/2005 6:03:44 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

bttt


218 posted on 10/25/2005 6:12:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
So, all the leaks have supposedly been from lawyers who are talking about what Libby testified to, what Miller testified to etc.

So, who are these lawyers who are leaking all this information?

219 posted on 10/25/2005 6:17:43 PM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
So, who are these lawyers who are leaking all this information?

Beats me. I'm not sure they are "leaks" as much as they are wishful figments. Something to feed the media, etc.

220 posted on 10/25/2005 6:21:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson