Posted on 10/25/2005 9:37:22 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Starting today, all eligible Texans can vote on whether to make nine changes to the state constitution.
The propositions include one that affects the Texas railroad industry which, though not the most controversial issue on the ballot, is quickly coming under voter scrutiny.
Proposition 1 is listed on the ballot as “the constitutional amendment creating the Texas rail relocation and improvement fund and authorizing grants of money and issuance of obligations for financing the relocation, rehabilitation, and expansion of rail facilities.”
The amendment would create the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement fund.
According to a summary of the proposition, it's purpose is to “provide for the Texas Transportation Commission to issue and sell obligations to fund the relocation and improvement of privately and publicly owned passenger and freight rail facilities for the purposes of relieving congestion on public highways, enhancing public safety, improving air quality, and expanding economic opportunity. The obligations would be payable from the money in the Texas rail relocation and improvement fund. The amendment would also authorize the legislature to dedicate to the fund state money that is not otherwise dedicated by the constitution.”
According to the Texas Legislative Council, proponents of the amendment argue that “the ability to ship more goods using railroads would decrease the number of trucks traveling on highways, thereby reducing congestion.
“The relocation of rail lines from congested urban areas would improve efficiency, encourage investment, and promote safety. Right-of-way obtained by relocating railroads out of cities could be used for the placement of commuter rail lines or highways, each of which could provide economic opportunities for private investment along its corridors.
“Freight rail is more fuel-efficient per ton-mile than trucks and would help Texas comply with federal air quality standards. Also, relocating rail lines out of urban areas would reduce the amount of hazardous materials shipped through highly populated areas.”
The Texas Legislative Council is an information resource with members including the lieutenant governor, speaker of the house, six senators appointed by the lieutenant governor, the chairman of the house administration committee and five other members of the house of representatives appointed by the speaker.
Proposition 1 opponents, including grassroots anti-toll groups like Stop121tolls.com and the Texas Toll Party, said they are encouraging voters to reject the amendment.
They said they believe its purpose is to give tax-payer funded incentives to private companies, encouraging them to relocate within the Trans-Texas Corridor, a 12-lane planned toll road system that Gov. Rick Perry has proposed to get cross-state and commercial traffic off of congested interstates.
“It's a blank check,” said Stop121tolls.com founder Randy Jennings. “Basically, the public is going to pay the toll for the train. It's about making money for these foreign companies that will run the Trans-Texas Corridor.”
If passed, he said, Proposition 1 allows the Texas Transportation Commission to sell bonds without voter approval for each issuance, as in municipal and school bond elections.
“There's no real checks or balances. Once this is approved, they can keep issuing debt forever,” Jennings said.
Arguments against Proposition 1 listed by the Texas Legislative Council are similar: “The railroad industry is not a state-regulated industry, and the state should play no part in the industry's investment decisions. The debt service on the bonds issued could cost the state $87.5 million per year beginning in fiscal year 2007, and the Texas Department of Transportation's primary duties involve planning and making policies for the location, construction, and maintenance of state highways. The authority of the agency over railroad issues is limited, and the department should use its resources to carry out its primary duties.”
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
I'll let you know about the other six when I read them.
BTTT
NO! NO! A thousand times NO!
Thanks for the ping!
I'm SHOCKED that you would favor letting these clowns issue bonded indebtedness without voter approval!
Shocked probably isn't a strong enough word! Perhaps STUNNED would work!
Prop One IS voter approval.
You're probably opposed to Perry's highway. I'm not.
Proponents of Prop. 1 conspicuously fail to tell where the money to pay off those bonds would come from - gasoline taxes! Money that should be dedicated to building and repairing highways, instead of being siphoned off for every crackpot "mass transit" scheme, and now things like this to benefit a few failing cities like El Paso.
They want to move railroads out of the cities?
Why do they think people USE railroads? It's to move goods to the cities!
With the rail lines moved, it would increase the truck traffic into the cities - but the money to create new roads would have been sucked up by the rail move!
Not necessarily opposed to it at all but ABSOLUTELY opposed to ALL the creative ways they are inventing of get around the ballanced budget requirements of the Texas Constitution!
You may be correct, but I recall reading somewhere that it is really intended to fund the relocation of the rail yards in El Paso to free that land up for developers.
And before you ask for proof, no, I have no idea where I read that.
This isn't where I read it, but it shows I didn't fabricate it:
"AUSTIN -- For years, El Paso officials have studied the multimillion-dollar plan to move hundreds of acres of rail yards out of Downtown to make way for more-attractive development.
Texas voters might give the officials help with their plan next month."
http://www.elpasotimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051016/NEWS/510160330/1001/ARCHIVES
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.