Posted on 10/25/2005 9:32:46 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
Rich countries must abandon farm subsidies and give more market access to poor states if the Doha trade talks are to succeed, the head of the World Bank said today. Bank chief Paul Wolfowitz made his appeal amid fears that the World Trade Organization (WTO) meeting of ministers in Hong Kong was in jeopardy because of the absence of progress on farm subsidies.
Writing in the Financial Times, Wolfowitz said the need to reduce protection on agriculture was a central element of the Doha talks. He warned that unless serious concessions were made by all sides, the Doha talks would fail "and the people who will suffer the most are the world's poor".
Wolfowitz, formerly a leading Pentagon official, called on the U.S. to step up efforts to cut farm subsidies and urged the European Union to do more on market access for products from poor countries. He added, however, that developing countries also had to open their services and manufacturing markets and lower their own agricultural protection.
Wolfowitz said it was not morally justifiable for rich countries to spend $280 billion (£158 billion) - nearly the total gross domestic product of Africa and four times the total amount of foreign aid - on support for agricultural producers.
The current round of WTO talks stalled in Geneva after wealthy countries failed to reach an agreement on lowering domestic agriculture subsidies and tariffs earlier this month.
Mark Vaile, the Australian trade minister and deputy prime minister, said the E.U. and "particularly France" were responsible for the deadlock because they had refused to accept a plan to cut European farm aid.
"They need to understand they are threatening the future of global trade and cheating millions of the world's poor out of new hope," Vaile said. "It's not enough for them to provide aid and debt relief when the benefits of liberalizing trade are so much greater."
An agreement in Hong Kong is supposed to pave the way for the conclusion of the Doha development round next year, but deadlock on farm subsidies has threatened to scupper the entire process.
The E.U. - generally seen as the villain of the piece by developing countries and the U.S. - is working on a second and final offer this week. The move follows what the U.S. described as its "bold" proposal for trimming the most damaging of its multi-billion dollar agricultural subsidies by up to 60% and phasing them out within a decade.
Development activists say the U.S. scheme is double-edged because it insists on poor countries opening up their manufacturing sectors, a step that could lead to the sectors' collapse in the face of foreign competition.
The U.S. plan has put the E.U. on the spot, and it has struggled to come up with a unified position. France believes the latest round of common agricultural policy reforms - which cut the link between the level of subsidy and the amount farmers produce - went far enough, and is refusing to budge.
The idea of cancelling the Hong Kong meeting has been proposed, but Australia has rejected it. "I don't believe the meeting should be postponed, even if the E.U. does not put forward a better proposal," Vaile said. "I believe the E.U. and France would need to account for their actions before the parliament of world opinion."
Wolfowitz increased pressure on the industrialized world when he said the temporary discomfort of industrialized countries in getting rid of farm subsidies was "nothing compared with the daily discomfort and deprivation faced by the world's poorest people".
What is in the amber box in the US SPS?
So we should let them come here and bring their peculiar brand of anarchy with them?
The anarchy that Africa suffers from doesn't seem to export. Here in NY Africans are among the hardest working immigrants you'll ever see.
I'm sure the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative can help you out. Good luck.
Don't you work for them?
Its interesting how important it is to you for everyone to agree with you, yet if we ask you questions about the policies you support, you can't be bothered to answer them.
You realize there is a difference between high prices and high profits?
It would create jobs in America.
How many American jobs are currently lost to imported coffee?
If it doesn't, national independence and jobs are more important than foreign gourmet coffee beans.
A high standard of living is important too.
End runaway population growth from immigration, and remain independent of the rest of the world by not outgrowing our domestic resouces.
There's a good way to build a strong America, cut our energy use by 50%.
You have some interesting ideas. If we wanted to live like a much poorer country your ideas would be the way to go.
I agree, pointing out your flip-flops damages your credibility.
FYI, we can grow coffee very nicely in Hawaii, as well as bananas and other tropical fruit.
Depends how you define poverty.
Hardship makes a people strong.
Luxury makes them soft and eager for more luxury.
And so the addiction to cheap foreign goods.
I'd rather be strong and independent than drink gourmet coffee.
To be strong and independent is a superior form of wealth.
Even better.
Yeah.
Especially after you sold them advanced technology and educated them in our universities so they can use all that to hurt us.
If we had left them alone, what would they do--paddle here in their canoes to throw spears at us?
Yeah, and cheap coffee from Hawaii costs, what, $10.00 a pound? When we add your tariff, what will the price be then?
What are you talking about?
You mentioned that we grow coffee very "nicely" in Hawaii. I merely added that we grow it very expensively. Since you are in favor of agricultural tariffs in order to benefit our domestic producers, I simply asked how much more you are willing to add to their selling price.
There isn't any going back and there's no closing the door. The world is changing. It's a different world than it was a decade ago and in another decade it will be even more different. How individuals, groups of people and nations manage that change will determine whether they survive or not.
Hawaii is a state, filled with American citzens, not a foreign country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.