Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence Has Turned Against the Miers Nomination
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | October 31, 2005 | Jack Kelly

Posted on 10/25/2005 2:31:49 AM PDT by RWR8189

Some in the news media, citing anonymous sources, say Vice President Dick Cheney recommended against nominating Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court. If true, this should dispel the notion, prevalent on the fever swamp Left, that Mr. Cheney pulls the president's strings. But in this instance, it would have been better if the moonbats had been right. If you're in a hole, stop digging. That's good advice, but it tends to be followed only by those who realize they're in a hole.

President Bush is in a pit, dug in large part by his "friends."

Like most conservatives, I was disappointed when Mr. Bush chose a person unknown to all but the handful who have worked with her. But I was appalled more by the childish and churlish reaction of much of the conservative intelligentsia. The president, by virtue of his stellar judicial choices in the past, had earned the benefit of the doubt. And Ms. Miers deserved the opportunity to be heard before harsh judgments were made about her.

But it is one thing to give the president the benefit of the doubt in the absence of evidence, another to continue giving him that benefit in the face of evidence.

If Ms. Miers were as smart and as conservative as Mr. Bush said she was, criticism should have abated as we learned more about her. It hasn't worked out that way.

Her private meetings with senators have gone poorly. "No one is walking out of these meetings thinking they've just met with a star," a staffer who attended one told the Washington Times.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; cheney; harrietmiers; justicemiers; miers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-280 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2005 2:31:50 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
If Ms. Miers were as smart and as conservative as Mr. Bush said she was, criticism should have abated as we learned more about her. It hasn't worked out that way.

B.I.N.G.O.

2 posted on 10/25/2005 2:34:32 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

"I had wanted to wait until the hearings to make up my mind about Ms. Miers. But now I fear continuing this debacle will produce the worst of all worlds for conservatives."

I feel much the same way.

I was hoping she would wow us when given the chance. The truth is, everything we find out about her does just the opposite.


3 posted on 10/25/2005 2:51:11 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"If Ms. Miers were as smart and as conservative as Mr. Bush said she was, criticism should have abated as we learned more about her. It hasn't worked out that way."

Worth repeating.


4 posted on 10/25/2005 2:52:08 AM PDT by NapkinUser ("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I saw Cheney interviewed on Fox regarding Miers a few days ago. In spite of saying all the right things, I got the feeling he wasn't really behind her.

Maybe I should say 'trying to say all the right things', because once again, people can't find a whole lot to say in her support. He was reduced to telling an anecdote about Lyn Cheney applying for a job in the 60's where her gender seemed to be more important than her PhD, and never did make a connection between that and Miers' qualifications for SCOTUS. Of course there isn't any. I almost felt embarrassed for him.

5 posted on 10/25/2005 3:00:09 AM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Anonymous sources? Sure thing, this author is simply parroting the rest of the anti-Miers ilk. Miers is going to be confirmed and will make a great judge similiar to Scalia and Thomas.
6 posted on 10/25/2005 3:01:14 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; Petronski; martin_fierro
"No one is walking out of these meetings thinking they've just met with a star,"

Yes, but I hear that she's a good bowler. That should count for something.

;-)

***

"You know, she's a very gracious and funny person," said Joshua B. Bolten, the director of the Office of Management and Budget whom Ms. Miers succeeded as deputy White House chief of staff in 2003.

In the next breath, Mr. Bolten recalled relaxing with her at Camp David. "She is a very good bowler," he said. "For someone her size, she actually gets a lot of action out of the pins."

*******

........ thought you'd never hear the words that Harriet Miers "gets a lot of action, eh?

7 posted on 10/25/2005 3:02:31 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

If she were that smart and of such sterling character, she would have bowed out gracefully long ago.


8 posted on 10/25/2005 3:04:57 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
If she were that smart and of such sterling character, she would have bowed out gracefully long ago.

Thought you guys wanted a big fight?  You know the kind where you kick the corpse till its bleeds dry?  Well, why put an end to the fun? /Sarcasm

If you knew Bush as well as you thought you knew him, you would have seen the Miers appointment coming.  And if you knew him as well as all these Miers bashing posts seem to indicate, you'd know it will take an extraordinary cataclysmic event to persuade either of these Texans to back down.

May as well enjoy it.

9 posted on 10/25/2005 3:13:51 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

"Anonymous sources? Sure thing, this author is simply parroting the rest of the anti-Miers ilk. Miers is going to be confirmed and will make a great judge similiar to Scalia and Thomas."

Wishful thinking. You have no real idea whats going to happen.


10 posted on 10/25/2005 3:14:22 AM PDT by NapkinUser ("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Yet another woman with "all the necessary requirements to make one damned fine Supreme Court justice... for life." :)

11 posted on 10/25/2005 3:15:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
Texan???? Miers is just a run of the mill, lite in the loafers lawyer, that attached herself to a person in power years ago.

Such people are usually called toadies. The pundits were kind and called her a crony which is a step up.

12 posted on 10/25/2005 3:19:14 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
And recent revelations about her support for racial set asides indicate Ms. Miers is to the left of Sandra Day O'Connor on affirmative action, a matter of as much distress to conservatives as her abortion views are to liberals.
A point that has gone largely ignored or dismissed by the pro-Miers crowd.

 
13 posted on 10/25/2005 3:21:29 AM PDT by counterpunch (- SCOTUS interruptus - withdraw Miers before she blows it -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

lol


14 posted on 10/25/2005 3:23:45 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
From: http://presidentaristotle.blogspot.com/2005/10/case-for-miers-when-things-look-blurry.html

Miers' paper trail: abortion

4.1: In 1989, she contributed $150 to Texans for Life. 95% of those who contribute to pro-life groups seek to reverse Roe v. Wade; there's no reason to think Miers is an exception.

4.2: When she ran for Dallas City Council, she openly identified herself as pro-life. Her campaign manager has since called her "on the extreme end of the anti-choice movement".

4.3: She became head of the Texas Bar in 1992-93, and used her position to lobby against the ABA's pro-abortion positions. She continued this lobbying late into the decade. There is no reason to doubt that this was powerfully rooted in her own pro-life political views.

4.4: She gave money to Bentsen and Gore in 1987/88 when she was still a conservative Democrat. Since 1990 she has made 13-14 political donations, and these donations have gone ONLY to 100% pro-life candidates.

4.5: In 2000 she gave money to Donald Stenberg, the Nebraska attorney general who defended Nebraska's partial birth abortion law before the Supreme Court. As one blogger put it: “I didn’t know she had given to Sternberg [sic]. The only people who I know from around here who did that were the real activists.” Exactly.

4.6: Summary: this is the most extensive pro-life record of any nominee to the Supreme Court in recent years. Even Scalia and Thomas, who both rejected Roe, never had a record like that. Roberts certainly never did. Her on-record pro-life convictions are clear and undeniable.

Is this a guarantee that Miers will vote to overturn Roe? No, there can be no guarantees on that. It is highly probable however. And it is close to a guarantee that she will vote to reverse Stenberg (a 5-4 decision with O'Connor in the majority).

15 posted on 10/25/2005 3:26:16 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Texan???? Miers is just a run of the mill, lite in the loafers lawyer, that attached herself to a person in power years ago.
Such people are usually called toadies.
Yes, a hapless toadie that for reasons of her own, lives her entire life in Texas.

 

16 posted on 10/25/2005 3:28:10 AM PDT by counterpunch (- SCOTUS interruptus - withdraw Miers before she blows it -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Texan????

Texan.

Miers is just a run of the mill, lite in the loafers lawyer, that attached herself to a person in power years ago.

Attached, yes.  Run of the mill, no.  Lite, no.  Loafer, definitely not.  Lawyer, absolutely.

Such people are usually called toadies.

Such people are called many things by the envious and the rancorous.  Sometimes they're even right.  Not this time.

The pundits were kind and called her a crony which is a step up.

The pundits, even the best of them, were embarrassed they didn't know Bush as well as they thought they did.  How dare he disappoint and confound them!

17 posted on 10/25/2005 3:34:49 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I and a PHD English professor use to do work for such types of lawyers.From writing briefs to picking jurors.

Passing the bar exam is a measure of the MINIMUM requirements needed.

18 posted on 10/25/2005 3:37:10 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

And recent revelations about her support for racial set asides indicate Ms. Miers is to the left of Sandra Day O'Connor on affirmative action



If that statement be true, could it be the reason Bush is lax on border control?


19 posted on 10/25/2005 3:37:47 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

As a conservative, we are all embarrassed that we did not know Bush as well as we should have. He has indeed been an overall disappointment so we do agree on that.


20 posted on 10/25/2005 3:40:08 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson