Posted on 10/24/2005 9:05:41 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
Monday, Oct. 24, 2005 10:24 p.m. EDT Times: Cheney First Disclosed CIA Official's Name
The New York Times reported late Monday that Vice President Cheney has been directly linked to the so-called "Plamegate" scandal involving the disclosure of the name of Valerie Plame, a CIA officer.
The paper reported that Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby "first learned about the C.I.A. officer at the heart of the leak investigation in a conversation with Mr. Cheney weeks before her identity became public in 2003."
The paper sourced their story to "lawyers involved in the case."
The Times said that notes taken by Libby differ from his own testimony before the grand jury as to when he first learned of Plame's identity.
"The notes, taken by Mr. Libby during the conversation, for the first time place Mr. Cheney in the middle of an effort by the White House to learn about Ms. Wilsons husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, who was questioning the administrations handling of intelligence about Iraqs nuclear program to justify the war."
Cheney apparently discovered details of Plame's CIA work after he questioned then CIA Director George J. Tenet about her husband, Ambassador Wilson.
But even if Libby or Cheney had disclosed Plame's identity as a CIA officer they may not have committed a crime.
"Disclosing a covert agents identity can be a crime, but only if the person who discloses it knows the agents undercover status," the Times said.
An unsourced person claims that Cheney did it?
Maybe Libby will lose his law license too. Maybe not.
Jones' case was not about perjury, but the articles of impeachment from the Lewinski scandal were, and we know how that turned out. You brought up the Jones case and I responded to that. He had his law license suspended as part of an agreement to end the independent counsel's investigation.
But the main point is that Fuhrman's and Clinton's lies were material to the investigations that were going on. I don't see how Libby allegedly lying about where he heard of Plame being material if Fitzgerald cannot prove that Plame's identity as an undercover agent was known.
Well, I guess Judge Wright and the Arkansas Bar was wrong then.
Better contact them.
I already have, several times.
See my prior posts regarding proving criminal knowledge of Plame's status as a covert agent, as opposed to someone merely working for the CIA, at the time of the communications.
If Fitzgerald cannot prove that any alleged leaker either had actual knowledge of Plame's status as a covert agent or reasonably believed she was a covert agent, he has no case relating to "unauthorized disclosure", as you put it. I think that its pretty clear that he has no case on the main part of the investigation, at least not against Cheney, Rove or Libby.
Perjury only comes into play if it is material to the underlying investigation. Although the underlying investigation also dealt with sources of leaks, Libby cannot be convicted of perjury for allegedly lying about his source unless it can also be shown that he knew Plame was a covert agent. It's a fine point of law but that's what I see in the leaks from unidentified lawyers close to the investigation, and all the prattling on about other issues by the likes of Fineman and O'Donnell yesterday.
Can you point to anything anywhere that indicates any target of the investigation besides Joe Wilson and Plame knew that Plame was a covert agent instead of simply a CIA employee at the time of the communications?
The fact that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA is just as probative, perhaps even more, of the alleged bad intent behind discrediting Wilson, than if she was working as a covert agent. If she was in a position to have her husband assigned to Niger, it's more likely that she'd have more influence as a "CIA official" than she would as a "covert agent".
It would make a lot of sense of a reporter preparing a book to make every possible effort to bypass other news media, and Administration statements and try to get directly to the folks in the CIA putting together the reports the Administration was using.
Judith can't recall WHO because there are many folks who provided her information for her book.
I'm more credible than the Slimes, dr.
The point isn't that Plame was not in fact covert - the point is that there's no proof that any of the people I've discussed actually knew or reasonably believed she was when the communications were made - for what's going on about the 5th or 6th time with you.
I'm not going to explain to you it again.
Aldridge Ames outed Valerie Plame in 1995......over 9 years ago. David Corn was the first reporter in this media frenzy to name her in his column.
Rush just pointed out how utterly absurd it is to think THE VICE PRESIDENT can't/should'nt speak of matters of the US with his staff.
But didn't Wilson himself, or her, on a web site, also "out" her?
The NY Times, so famous for fiction of late, seems to be attempting to branch out into commedy.
If the Times commedy is even half as hillarous as it's fictional facts have been, it should be a smashing success.
P.S. As a newbie you haven't quite got the lay of the land around these parts re VP Cheney.
oops....that's presiDential
IMHO Judith Miller can't recall, for exactly the same reason the Clinton twins could not recall. Taking the fifth makes everyone more suspicious.
Little does Judith realize that post-Clinton, can't recall, raises the same suspicions.
It is a FACT that Aldridge Ames outed Valerie Plame in 1995......9 years ago. It is a FACT that in the present media frenzy David Corn was the 1st reporter to name her in his column.
Well, I guess Judge Wright and the Arkansas Bar 'were' wrong is correct............ don't get pissed.
Facts and grammar are our friends.
***********
By the way, I PRAY that Mr. Fitzgerald has done his homework well and that he is honorable, and then indicts the real liars........... Wilson, Plame, and a bundle of others.
***
I don't know if you saw this thread. I was afraid to ping you on this.
****
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1508146/posts
Is Valerie Plame the new Deep Throat?
For the one millionth time, do NOT post to me or FREEPMAIL me again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.