Skip to comments.
Times: Cheney First Disclosed CIA Official's Name
newsmax.com ^
| Monday, Oct. 24, 2005 10:24 p.m. EDT
Posted on 10/24/2005 9:05:41 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: InvisibleChurch
so Libby provides his notes, and then gives testimony contra to his own notes, which he provided? how's that?
2
posted on
10/24/2005 9:08:06 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: InvisibleChurch
Much ado about nothing.
That isn't going to keep the MSM from foaming at the mouth, though.
3
posted on
10/24/2005 9:09:21 PM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: oceanview
So isnt George Tenet the real culprit? This whole witch hunt is a bad joke
4
posted on
10/24/2005 9:10:10 PM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want yo"ur opinion they will give it to you.)
To: InvisibleChurch
The New York Times reported late Monday that Vice President Cheney has been directly linked to the so-called "Plamegate" scandal involving the disclosure of the name of Valerie Plame, a CIA officer. Cheney apparently discovered details of Plame's CIA work after he questioned then CIA Director George J. Tenet about her husband, Ambassador Wilson. Ummm....errr....then doesn't that make George Tenet the source of the leak?
5
posted on
10/24/2005 9:11:11 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: InvisibleChurch
"Cheney apparently discovered details of Plame's CIA work after he questioned then CIA Director George J. Tenet about her husband, Ambassador Wilson." Looks like Tenet did it. Hell, I'll bet Wilson/Flame did it first. So what's the biggie? It was common knowlede and not a crime anyway. No crime. No foul.
To: InvisibleChurch
I think the NYT has fallen over the edge. This sounds like wild eyed hysteria.
7
posted on
10/24/2005 9:12:09 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: InvisibleChurch
That piece has George Tenet revealing that Plame had a name.
Amazingly she wasn't just some ol' gal baking cookies and being satisfied to be known as Mrs. Wilson.
Looks like the New York Times is trying to dig its way out of the blame for this story ~ just like the Warsh Post is doing.
8
posted on
10/24/2005 9:12:14 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: everyone
Absolutely much ado about nothing. In addition, Cheney wouldn't have been dumb enough to blow an undercover agent. And even if he did, it's a tiny scandal. The people who are angry about this were never angry about such things before. If the worst happens and Cheney is indicted, I hope Bush has the character and the political wisdom to stand behind him 1,000 percent -- hell or high water, Mr. President.
To: oceanview
so Libby provides his notes, and then gives testimony contra to his own notes, which he provided? how's that?do you remember the clintonista who claimed he "lied to his diary" when he gave conflicting testimony apart from his notes?
liberalism is garbageism
10
posted on
10/24/2005 9:13:40 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(The search for someone to blame is always successful. - Robert Half)
To: InvisibleChurch
But even if Libby or Cheney had disclosed Plame's identity as a CIA officer they may not have committed a crime. What is this repeated crap of "may not have committed a crime?" THERE WAS NO CRIME! She was not covert or an agent as far as I can tell!
11
posted on
10/24/2005 9:14:31 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
To: oceanview
To: California Patriot
did Cheney testify under oath in the GJ proceeding?
To: stocksthatgoup
I think you hit the nail on the head. This is indeed a witch hunt. Has all the necessary traits. And yes, it is quite ridiculous. Particularly the way the media is outrightly foaming at the mouth hoping for the worst to happen so they can wax rhetoric on their various papers and tv shows.
14
posted on
10/24/2005 9:16:40 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: InvisibleChurch
Sounds like the only person who didn't know Valerie Plame was an employee of the CIA was the janitor.
15
posted on
10/24/2005 9:16:49 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Bommer
It's just GOTCHA, played for blood. So terribly disgustingly Machiavellian.
16
posted on
10/24/2005 9:16:50 PM PDT
by
bboop
(Facts are your friend.)
To: Jim Robinson
We do know that Wilson lied to congress.
THAT is a FACT.
17
posted on
10/24/2005 9:17:43 PM PDT
by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: nopardons
I don't think its noise.
if nothing happens this week, if no indictments come down - the MSM is going to have reached a new low. why would they go out on a limb with all these stories starting from late last week?
To: stocksthatgoup
The real culprits are Plame and her stupid husband
19
posted on
10/24/2005 9:18:26 PM PDT
by
DLfromthedesert
(Texas Cowboy...you da man!!)
Now its Cheney. Last week its Rove and Libby and anyone else who ever had an 'R after their name....By next week it'll be one of the switchboard ops at the WH. The NY Slimes is finished.
20
posted on
10/24/2005 9:18:32 PM PDT
by
Cougar66
(If I wanted a woman to be President, I'd have voted for John Kerry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson