Posted on 10/24/2005 6:28:34 PM PDT by nj26
I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheneys chief of staff, first learned about the C.I.A. officer at the heart of the leak investigation in a conversation with Mr. Cheney weeks before her identity became public in 2003, lawyers involved in the case said Monday.
Notes of the previously undisclosed conversation between Mr. Libby and Mr. Cheney on June 12, 2003, appear to differ from Mr. Libbys testimony to a federal grand jury that he initially learned about the C.I.A. officer, Valerie Wilson, from journalists, the lawyers said.
The notes, taken by Mr. Libby during the conversation, for the first time place Mr. Cheney in the middle of an effort by the White House to learn about Ms. Wilsons husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, who was questioning the administrations handling of intelligence about Iraqs nuclear program to justify the war.
Lawyers said the notes show that Mr. Cheney knew that Ms. Wilson worked at the C.I.A. more than a month before her identity was made public and her undercover status was disclosed in a syndicated column by Robert D. Novak on July 14, 2003.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
You're absolutely right, of course...but there will still be Republican Administration folks indicted, and the 'Rats will gorge and feast on that point for next year's conveniently timed election cycle.
I can already hear Nancy Puke-losi shrieking about "corruption"...
Like some of US aren't?
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
The old Martha Stewart gotcha. If anything ever said or done on an issue by the targets they want to nail can be classified as illegal obstruction, then you can get anybody for anything.
lawyers said?
lol
There's a big push to make R's appear corrupt before the Queen set forth.
Okay, then hope that President Bush, VP Cheney, Rove, and Scooter Libby are ALL indicted, as well as Secretary Rice and all the members of WHIG. Dennis Hastert will then be the president. Happy now?
Not likely to happen,
Do you blame Tenat for wanting to know who was behind sending a flunkie like Joe Wilson to Niger on a mission he knew nothin g about?
Tenet to Cheney to Libby.
"Mr. Libbys notes indicate that Mr. Cheney had gotten his information about Ms. Wilson from George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, in response to questions from the vice president about Mr. Wilson.
But they contain no suggestion that either Mr. Cheney or Mr. Libby knew at the time of Ms. Wilsons undercover status or that her identity was classified."
And if the leaker to the NYT is neither Libby nor his lawyer, an investigation should be launched.
That irksome Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Not that Fitzgerald or anybody at Justice cares.
ping
When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. Methinks that about sums up the NYT rag.
This is Bennett, Judith's attorney & probably NYTs too putting out information not the prosecutor, IMO. If the prosecutor's office is leaking that would be rather ironic. Maybe they should start an investigation about that! I think that's exactly what David Kendell did during Monicagate. He would leak something to the press, then claim it came from Starr's office. An investigation was started by Reno and then Kendell's office would find out about what Starr was investigating. There should have been a RICO case against the Clintons. They are as slick as any mobster in the country.
LOL,
The question left begging is this: Why would Cheny disclose a CIA agents name? It is because the CIA had launched a covert operation using Wilson as a plausibly deniable foil for a public campaign against President Bush's Iraq policy. Cheny had a valid reason for drawing
the Wilson CIA connection. The Liberal 5th column inside the CIA, those responsible for NOT apprehending the Al Quaida terrorist operations in the USA, were and are
reassigned or drummed out of the CIA. Our president was quietly cleaning house and replacing the CIA Director.
In other words Cheny had a valid reason for making a Wilson/CIA connection, and it was his duty to do so.
The CIA is out of conmtrol here, and it needs to stop.
Assuming this is correct, my guess is he didn't want the boss involved, and he perjured himself. The only thing might be the Martha crime.
as Rush was saying last week:
- either all these stories we've seen since late last week are totally invented - which would mean the MSM is totally pathological. Or, Fitzgerald has been compromised and they have first hand leaks about what is happening.
take your pick.
Please tell me you forgot your sarcasm tag..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.