Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney Told Aide of C.I.A. Officer, Notes Show
NY Times ^ | 10/24/05 | DAVID JOHNSTON, RICHARD W. STEVENSON and DOUGLAS JEHL

Posted on 10/24/2005 6:28:34 PM PDT by nj26

I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, first learned about the C.I.A. officer at the heart of the leak investigation in a conversation with Mr. Cheney weeks before her identity became public in 2003, lawyers involved in the case said Monday.

Notes of the previously undisclosed conversation between Mr. Libby and Mr. Cheney on June 12, 2003, appear to differ from Mr. Libby’s testimony to a federal grand jury that he initially learned about the C.I.A. officer, Valerie Wilson, from journalists, the lawyers said.

The notes, taken by Mr. Libby during the conversation, for the first time place Mr. Cheney in the middle of an effort by the White House to learn about Ms. Wilson’s husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, who was questioning the administration’s handling of intelligence about Iraq’s nuclear program to justify the war.

Lawyers said the notes show that Mr. Cheney knew that Ms. Wilson worked at the C.I.A. more than a month before her identity was made public and her undercover status was disclosed in a syndicated column by Robert D. Novak on July 14, 2003.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cheney; cialeak; davidjohnston; douglasjehl; jehl; joewilson; johnston; richardstevenson; richardwstevenson; stevenson; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-543 next last
To: StAnDeliver
It's all chicken and no egg, Pinch. Why? Because she wasn't NOC, she was a desk jockey, and apparently well known inside and outside the Agency. So just eat a salad and relax, hippie. You got nothing.

You're absolutely right, of course...but there will still be Republican Administration folks indicted, and the 'Rats will gorge and feast on that point for next year's conveniently timed election cycle.

I can already hear Nancy Puke-losi shrieking about "corruption"...

21 posted on 10/24/2005 6:46:37 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Like a midget at a urinal - stay on your toes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ez
The DUers must be positively nerve-wracked.

Like some of US aren't?

22 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:04 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

23 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:26 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
It would not be illegal for either Mr. Cheney or Mr. Libby, both of whom are presumably cleared to know the government’s deepest secrets, to discuss a C.I.A. officer or her link to a critic of the administration. But any effort by Mr. Libby to steer investigators away from his conversation with Mr. Cheney could be considered by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the case, to be an illegal effort to impede the inquiry.

The old Martha Stewart gotcha. If anything ever said or done on an issue by the targets they want to nail can be classified as illegal obstruction, then you can get anybody for anything.

24 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:43 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (I could care less if the Gitmo prisoners got force-fed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview; norton; the Real fifi; Shermy; frankjr
The lawyer involved with the leak is Bob Bennett. What is this "Under cover Status" BS again?


"Some lawyers in the case have said Mr. Fitzgerald may face obstacles in bringing a false statement charge against Mr. Libby. They said it could be difficult to prove that he intentionally sought to mislead the grand jury. Lawyers involved in the case said they have no indication that Mr. Fitzgerald is considering charging Mr. Cheney with wrongdoing." I thought George Tenet was before the GJ. The theory is that Tenet was Novak's source, and once Tenet confessed Novak was never summoned.

But any effort by Mr. Libby to steer investigators away from his conversation with Mr. Cheney could be considered by Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Not so. The US Supreme court ruled that "Lying" to investigators was not obstruction of Justice, unless Libby was told that his evidence could be presented before a GJ.

It appears that that Cheney broke no law, duh!
25 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:54 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nj26

lawyers said?

lol


26 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:11 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
I'm not nerve-wracked. I think either he's got nothing or, if he indicts, he'll get no convictions.

There's a big push to make R's appear corrupt before the Queen set forth.

27 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:25 PM PDT by ez (I believed Juanita Broaddrick and I believe Harriet Miers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
You trust the N.Y. Slimes? You base your opinions on what appears in its pages?

Okay, then hope that President Bush, VP Cheney, Rove, and Scooter Libby are ALL indicted, as well as Secretary Rice and all the members of WHIG. Dennis Hastert will then be the president. Happy now?

28 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Not likely to happen,


29 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:42 PM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Do you blame Tenat for wanting to know who was behind sending a flunkie like Joe Wilson to Niger on a mission he knew nothin g about?


30 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:42 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Tenet to Cheney to Libby.

"Mr. Libby’s notes indicate that Mr. Cheney had gotten his information about Ms. Wilson from George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, in response to questions from the vice president about Mr. Wilson.
But they contain no suggestion that either Mr. Cheney or Mr. Libby knew at the time of Ms. Wilson’s undercover status or that her identity was classified."

And if the leaker to the NYT is neither Libby nor his lawyer, an investigation should be launched.
That irksome Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Not that Fitzgerald or anybody at Justice cares.


31 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:51 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; doug from upland; Mia T; ALOHA RONNIE; jwalsh07; Born Conservative; mhking; ...

ping


32 posted on 10/24/2005 6:50:31 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. Methinks that about sums up the NYT rag.


33 posted on 10/24/2005 6:50:32 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
Generally, no Obstruction of Justice. Perjury, well, no, There has to be MENS REA and you have to prove it beyond reasonable doubt.
34 posted on 10/24/2005 6:50:33 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nj26

This is Bennett, Judith's attorney & probably NYTs too putting out information not the prosecutor, IMO. If the prosecutor's office is leaking that would be rather ironic. Maybe they should start an investigation about that! I think that's exactly what David Kendell did during Monicagate. He would leak something to the press, then claim it came from Starr's office. An investigation was started by Reno and then Kendell's office would find out about what Starr was investigating. There should have been a RICO case against the Clintons. They are as slick as any mobster in the country.


35 posted on 10/24/2005 6:51:03 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

LOL,


36 posted on 10/24/2005 6:51:17 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nj26

The question left begging is this: Why would Cheny disclose a CIA agents name? It is because the CIA had launched a covert operation using Wilson as a plausibly deniable foil for a public campaign against President Bush's Iraq policy. Cheny had a valid reason for drawing
the Wilson CIA connection. The Liberal 5th column inside the CIA, those responsible for NOT apprehending the Al Quaida terrorist operations in the USA, were and are
reassigned or drummed out of the CIA. Our president was quietly cleaning house and replacing the CIA Director.

In other words Cheny had a valid reason for making a Wilson/CIA connection, and it was his duty to do so.
The CIA is out of conmtrol here, and it needs to stop.


37 posted on 10/24/2005 6:51:43 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl
Now, and this is a big if, if this is true, this is not illegal. But.... Libby apparently told the grand jury that he heard Valerie Plame's names from reporters.

Assuming this is correct, my guess is he didn't want the boss involved, and he perjured himself. The only thing might be the Martha crime.

38 posted on 10/24/2005 6:51:51 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

as Rush was saying last week:

- either all these stories we've seen since late last week are totally invented - which would mean the MSM is totally pathological. Or, Fitzgerald has been compromised and they have first hand leaks about what is happening.

take your pick.


39 posted on 10/24/2005 6:51:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Please tell me you forgot your sarcasm tag..


40 posted on 10/24/2005 6:52:04 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson