Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK'S GEORGE GALLOWAY REFUTES NEW OIL SCANDAL CLAIMS (Congressional Report says he lied)
Drudge Report ^ | 25 October 2005

Posted on 10/24/2005 5:26:02 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah

UK'S GEORGE GALLOWAY REFUTES NEW OIL SCANDAL CLAIMS Mon Oct 24 2005 19:52:44 ET

George Galloway has strongly refuted new allegations that he pocketed money from Saddam Hussein's scandal ridden oil-for-food programme and lied about it under oath.

The US Senate committee investigating the Respect MP's alleged involvement in the saga claims to have discovered £85,000 (150,000 dollars) in Iraqi oil money in his wife's bank account.

Mr Galloway may face criminal charges if found to have given false testimony to the committee when he defended himself against similar claims in a passionate showdown earlier this year.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has accused him of giving "false and misleading testimony" at the May 17 hearing.

Mr Galloway, who used the headline-grabbing appearance as the basis for a new book, denied being an oil trader, soliciting oil allocations or instructing anyone to do so on his behalf.

But Republican Senator Norm Coleman, who chairs the committee, claims to have obtained new evidence proving that Saddam's regime granted oil allocations to the Bethnal Green and Bow MP and his Mariam Appeal fund.

The committee's new report accuses Mr Galloway of personally soliciting and being granted eight oil allocations totalling 23 million barrels from the Hussein government between 1999 and 2003.

It claims that his estranged wife, Dr Amineh Abu-Zayyad, received approximately £85,000 (150,000 dollars) in connection with one allocation of oil.

Developing...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fawazzureikat; fawazzureqat; galloway; iraq; oilforfood; saddamhussein; zureikat; zureqat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2005 5:26:04 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
While Galloway Lied
Iraqi Kids Died

2 posted on 10/24/2005 5:31:36 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Frog march Bogus Joe Wilson to the bank and make him pay reparations to the US taxpayers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I found it puzzling that Coleman has remained silent ever since Galloway was here and basically told Norm to take a hike.

Now we know that Norm was keeping a tight lip for good reasons.

I'm almost a Norm fan, again.....


3 posted on 10/24/2005 5:40:26 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Enjoy Every Sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Isnt Galloway the cat that came here about a year ago and left grinning like a skunk eating crap because he embarrassed the investigators? Maybe he isnt grinning so widely now.

+++++It claims that his estranged wife, Dr Amineh Abu-Zayyad,++++++

HMMMMM. That in itself sounds suspicious to me.


4 posted on 10/24/2005 5:58:49 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Well finally here's some good news amidst all the hurricanes, Plame Blame, Scotus controvesy, etc.


5 posted on 10/24/2005 6:02:32 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Galloway comes over here an lectures at us with such a "cute" accent that it's hard to take him seriously, even though his speech is so bombastic and he says such nasty things.

It was hard, at first, for many Germans to take Austrian-accented Hitler seriously.
It was hard for the French to take Corisican-accented Napoleon seriously.
It was probably hard for Russians to take Georgian-accented Stalin seriously.

Beware of cute-speaking foreigners who want to run your country.

6 posted on 10/24/2005 6:07:30 PM PDT by syriacus (Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=2141792005
The Scotsman
Tue 25 Oct 2005
George Galloway has already faced down the US Senate's committee on investigations on allegations he profited from the UN oil-for-food programme. Now the Senate committee claims to have fresh evidence.
Picture: Danny Lawson



Galloway faces jail for fresh corruption claims

EBEN HARRELL

Key points
Senate committee alleges Galloway made £340,000 from UN programme
Galloway denied corruption charges before Senate in May
Galloway faces 15 years in US prison and fine of £420,000 if charges proven

Key quote
"Galloway was anything but straight with the committee; he was anything but straight with the American people. You heard a lot of bombast" - Senator Norm Coleman

Story in full GEORGE Galloway could be facing a lengthy prison sentence in the United States after a Senate committee last night claimed it had fresh evidence his political organisation and his wife had received nearly £340,000 in oil-for-food allocations from Saddam Hussein and then lied under oath about the deal.

The committee said it had the "smoking gun" that proved the anti-war activist received UN allocations from Saddam, a charge the Respect Party MP vehemently denied under oath in May.

Senator Norm Coleman, the chairman of an investigative subcommittee, said he will send the evidence to US Department of Justice and to British authorities. Mr Galloway could now face charges in America of perjury, making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding. Each charge carries a penalty of up to five years in prison and a £140,000 fine.

Mr Coleman said he had obtained evidence that Mr Galloway's political organisation and his wife received the money from illegal oil allocations.

"We have what we call the smoking gun," the senator said of the findings in the 60-page report. "Galloway was anything but straight with the committee; he was anything but straight with the American people. You heard a lot of bombast."

A spokesman for Mr Galloway, Ron McKay, said the anti-war activist denied the accusations and, if charged with perjury, would be willing to appear in an American court. "Put up or shut up," Mr McKay said of Mr Galloway's accusers, calling the report derogatory and defamatory.

Earlier, Mr Galloway released a statement saying that although he had not seen the report, which he called "a sneak revenge attack of the most contemptible kind," he continued to defend himself against allegations of impropriety.

"I have not made a penny out of oil deals with Iraq or indeed any other kind of deal," Mr Galloway said.

"This ought to be dead, yet Norm Coleman parrots it once more, from 3,000 miles away and protected by privilege."

During a May hearing, Mr Galloway blasted Mr Coleman's subcommittee as "the mother of all smoke screens," denying accusations that he profited from the oil-for-food programme and accusing lawmakers of unfairly tarnishing his name.

Mr Coleman, a harsh critic of the United Nations, said his panel's evidence shows that Mr Galloway personally solicited and was granted oil allocations totalling 23 million barrels from 1999 through 2003. Those allocations could be sold for a profit.

The report also alleges that Mr Galloway's friend, Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat, funnelled money from the oil-for-food programme to Mr Galloway's wife, Amineh Abu-Zayyad, and to the Mariam Appeal, a political organisation that Mr Galloway established in 1998.

Coleman said his investigators confirmed their evidence, which includes numerous bank records, in interviews with the former Iraqi deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, a friend of Mr Galloway's.


7 posted on 10/24/2005 6:11:48 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Galloway has denied the evidence, not refuted it. The latter usage indicates he has conclusively proven the allegations false, and he has not done any such thing, nor, I suspect, will he.
8 posted on 10/24/2005 6:14:27 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

True!


9 posted on 10/24/2005 6:15:38 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

bttt


10 posted on 10/24/2005 6:17:11 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
This is one more example of the press not understanding the words that it uses. To "refute" means to prove that a charge or claim is false. It's like presenting an airtight alibi when one is charged with a crime.

Galloway denied the charges. He said he didn't do it. But he did nothing to knock the facts down that were presented against him. He "refuted" nothing.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Reporting on the 2,000th American Death in Iraq"

11 posted on 10/24/2005 6:27:49 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Quoted by Rush, again, this Thursday. Hoohah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Any idea how much chance there is of extraditing him?


12 posted on 10/24/2005 7:07:00 PM PDT by Daralundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

To the U.S. or Iraq? ;)


13 posted on 10/24/2005 7:12:41 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah; dighton; hellinahandcart; Senator Bedfellow
Coleman said his investigators confirmed their evidence, which includes numerous bank records, in interviews with the former Iraqi deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, a friend of Mr Galloway's.

Tariq supposedly will testify against Saddam as well as Georgie-boy.

Popcorn time!

14 posted on 10/24/2005 7:20:20 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Galloway is more than a traitor, he is a foolish and arrogant liar-traitor. He may find that his own country will use the new revelations against him, and he may find that he must get out of Dodgingham, and escape to friendlier shores... like Tehran or.. Havana, or Berkeley. Stay away from Iraq, where they are trying that other monster Saddam, Galloway, or you may well meet a Gallows on your way.


15 posted on 10/24/2005 7:55:19 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (what to believe? good question...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell

It's really too bad this guy hasn't been thrown in jail already.

But the oil-for-food scam has too much evidence backing it for Galloway to be able to walk away from this one. If one thing gets prosecutors going, it's hard evidence.

See ya' in 10 years.


16 posted on 10/24/2005 8:04:25 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
As if Chistopher Hitchens needed any more ammo to kick this guys ass all over the lot.

Is extradition arranged yet?

17 posted on 10/24/2005 8:08:05 PM PDT by lawnguy (It works Napoleon, you don't even know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; dighton

18 posted on 10/24/2005 8:13:26 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; aculeus; Senator Bedfellow
Galloway has denied the evidence, not refuted it.

Illiteracy or mendacity, FReep this poll!

19 posted on 10/24/2005 8:31:55 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I think Galloway does what comes naturally to him. He feels he can get away with it because of his adulation by the Left.


20 posted on 10/24/2005 8:38:25 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson