How staged sex crime fooled Supreme Court

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 24, 2005 | Joseph Farah

[FreedomCalls]

The government has no right to regulate sexual acts between two consenting adults.

Such as prostitution or adultery?

[FreedomCalls]

The government has no right to regulate sexual acts between two consenting adults.

Such as prostitution or adultery?

[Paul C. Jesup]

This has less than nothing at all to do with me. All I did was correct your erroneously stated, factless post.

And I pointed out the hypocritical flaw in your logic when you wanted to ban one thing out of a list of many acts, some of which you have probably committed yourself, like using a condom.

[vikzilla]

A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.)

This is your tag line.

Can you not see that by wanting Homos prosecuted for this, that you set yourself up for whatever comes next.

The next time its your behaviour and its me thats offended by it.

[VRWCmember]

This is why the bride and groom have blood tests before they get married, to check to see if their blood types will not conflict with each other if they chose to have children.

Not in the last couple of decades they don't.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Such as prostitution or adultery?

You late to the discussion, check out the first 100 post first.

And on adultery, I thought that was legalized considering how many adulterers we have in government.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Not in the last couple of decades they don't.

Yes, they do blood tests for those reasons.

[nopardons]

Wrong again!

The blood test, which brides and grooms take before they are allowed to take out a marriage license, are to determine whether or not either party has syphilis and gonorrhea. These test have never tested for positive/negative blood types nor inherited diseases.

[Khepera]

hello strawman

[Paul C. Jesup]

Speak for yourself, read the thread before you post.

[highball]

Shaky ground there fella. What constitutes an adult? I suppose if you have a sliding scale on what constitutes normal sex you probably have a sliding scale on what constitutes an adult.

Nonsense. Nothing shaky about it - "adult" is quite clearly defined in a legal sense.

[Heyworth]

This has been common knowledge for quite some time.

I was wondering when someone was going to say this. All you have to do is read the account of what happened and it's obvious. This is a "file under 'DUH'" story.

[dmz]

If you had been "lured into this trap", you would have turned and walked out immediately. You would have seen about as much action as super bowl viewers a year plus ago saw of Janet Jackson's boob, i.e., having to turn your vcr to slow motion to even see what you thought you saw.

How far do you think a lawsuit would go, when it was you walking into their bedroom (regardless of how you came to be there)?

[andyk]

See the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:

Do you believe that anti-sodomy laws which predated the US Constitution were made unconstitutional at the moment it was ratified?

[newguy357]

You forgot one thing. Hetrosexual sex can transmit HIV from one person to another person.

(sarcasm) So, shall you make all sex illegal...

No, you're wrong. His argument is a valid criticism of your point.

First, I forget the exact numbers, but incestual sex only increases the odds of birth defect, from a percent or a little more to three or four times that. The majority of births will still be normal.

Likewise, with AIDs, heterosexuals can transmit, but homosexuals are many times more likely to transmit. So if you would outlaw incest based on public health (i.e., prevention of defects) one could apply the exact same argument to outlawing homosexual sex based on public health (which would save the society hundreds of millions of dollars annually, much more than blocking incest).

[Khepera]

people voted to have sodomy laws in place. To have judges overrule the will of the people is tyranny.

[Paul C. Jesup]

The blood test, which brides and grooms take before they are allowed to take out a marriage license, are to determine whether or not either party has syphilis and gonorrhea.

Those two can cause birth defects, if not, syphilis DOES cause insanity and death if not treated.

These test have never tested for positive/negative blood types nor inherited diseases.

You are wrong, doctors DO test blood types for that reason. I know that for a fact from about medical professionals who told me so DIRECTLY.

[pgyanke]

Can you not see that by wanting Homos prosecuted for this...

THAT'S what you're arguing about? Sheesh, I thought we were having a more interesting conversation than that.

YES, I want them prosecuted. Why? Because that was the law in their community as passed by elected representatives. In addition, I want them prosecuted for filing a false police report. I want them prosecuted for luring respectable citizens into a homosexual peep show. I want them prosecuted for abusing the court system.

Is it because they are homosexual? No. If a hetero couple lured police in the same way and were committing offenses against the local laws, I would expect the same.

A government which truly respects the electorate will never be big enough to threaten us. The fact that we are now threatened is a larger topic and goes back to our founding... we have no more representation.

[nopardons]

Look, being obtuse isn't helping your position. I corrected your false statement. I took no sides.

You can't go around claiming that something is a fact, when it isn't!

I stated historical facts. You posted what you imagine to be "true"; or are just positing things that agree with you own agenda. You can't state that we are now living in a "police-nanny-state", where the government, *gasp*, has all of a sudden decided what can and can not been done in someone's bedroom, when laws have been on the books, pertaining to sexual conduct, for more than 300 years.

Facts matter; your madeup garbage doesn't!

My posts have had nothing whatsoever with my position on the matter.