Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Post-Fitzgerald White House (Make way for what could be the worst week of W's presidency.)
The American Prowler ^ | 10/24/2005 | Jed Babbin

Posted on 10/23/2005 10:54:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Those who despise George Bush see him as the Second Coming of Richard Nixon, and they wish for nothing more fervently than a Second Going: a Watergate-magnitude scandal that will drive him from office. Their last best hope is Patrick Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald, appointed two years ago to investigate the CIA's complaint that Valerie Plame's CIA employ had been leaked to columnist Robert Novak, seemed destined to disappoint them. A month ago, even a week ago, it was possible without delusion to believe that Fitzgerald's investigation would end without indictments. But no longer. Thanks to a stream of leaks that have grown to flood stage, it's very likely that Fitzgerald will, this week, indict senior members of the Bush White House staff including, in all probability, Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser, and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the vice president's chief of staff. Both Rove and Libby were advised last week that they may "...be in serious legal jeopardy," according to one of the leaks. And they may not be the only White House and CIA employees Fitzgerald may indict. President Bush has had political good times and bad. If these indictments are issued, this will be the worst. Coming at a time of White House political weakness, if the MSM can make its fondest dream come true, Fitzgerald's actions could grow to be as serious politically as Watergate, from as little a seed.

The Plame Name Blame Game is not, from all we know, based on a criminal act. Under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, the source of Novak's column (or the other divulging acts, to those such as the NYT's Judith Miller) would have had to divulge Plame's covert identity intentionally at a time the CIA was taking active measures to conceal it. Neither condition appears to be satisfied, nor does it appear that other crimes such as espionage were committed (unless it can be proven that Karl Rove is a secret agent of Jacques Chirac). But Fitzgerald is apparently focusing his investigation on matters well beyond the act originally complained of, and even beyond the usual allegations of coverup and conspiracy.

The investigation began with the fact that when Joe Wilson, Plame's husband, was saying the rationale for the Iraq war was a lie, Rove and Libby were committing acts of politics in the White House. The two spoke to a number of reporters about Wilson's misrepresentations about his "mission" to Niger and its negligible results. Plame's employment at the CIA may have been discussed though not apparently divulged by Rove or Libby. Rove, having appeared before the grand jury four times and Libby, who has also testified, may be charged with obstruction of justice or perjury based on their recollection of the conversations between themselves and with reporters at the time and since the Fitzgerald inquiry began. Those are the usual "gotcha" crimes a special counsel charges under the oldest of political rules: it isn't what you do in Washington that's important, but what you do after you get caught. If that were the only basis for "Plamegate," the president -- if not his staff -- could rest easy. There will be no 18-minute gaps in Bush White House recordings.

Fitzgerald, according to several stories -- especially Judith Miller's account of her grand jury testimony -- seems to be going beyond the usual coverup investigation and into how classified information was handled in the Vice President's office. According to Miller's account of her grand jury testimony, Fitzgerald asked her repeatedly whether Libby had shared classified information with her. A Washington Post account, based on leaks from a "person familiar with Rove's testimony" -- as well as leaks apparently by either Fitzgerald's staff or Fitzgerald himself -- said, "One person in the probe said Fitzgerald showed considerable early interest in the White House Iraq Group, a task force created by Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. in August 2002 and charged with 'marketing' the war in Iraq to the public."

This is the most troubling aspect of the Fitzgerald investigation. The WHIG -- which included Condoleezza Rice, Rove, Libby and others -- was a strategy group coordinating the administration's political efforts on Iraq, beginning at the time we were about to take the case against Iraq to the UN. It was neither unusual nor some Machiavellian cabal charged with duping the public into backing a false war (though that is precisely what you will hear it was in the coming days.)

Looking at the conduct of Rove and Libby, whether they leaked classified information in violation of law and whether they could have perjured themselves or even conspired to do so is all within the usual -- and fair -- purview of a special counsel. Fitzgerald is described as apolitical, a straight shooter who is highly respected by his peers. But if he chooses to charge people for their political activities -- and the WHIG was nothing more -- he can for all intents criminalize politics.

Which is precisely that which the media is salivating over in anticipation. The usual suspects are already thinking Watergate Redux. Appropriately for a CBS reporter, Lesley Stahl appeared on the Comedy Channel and said that the Valerie Plame case "could possibly take off the way Watergate did." Howard Fineman of Newsweek wrote, on October 19, that it would be "poetic justice" if the Bush administration, which "rose to power on the strength of a disciplined, aggressive, leak-proof spin machine," were brought down by the Fitzgerald investigation. Fineman, eagerly anticipating Fitzgerald's actions, wrote, "You don't have to reach far back to find examples. Richard Nixon's rise was made possible by his calculating, outsider's mind. He knew how to use fear in the service of power because he was so full of fear himself. But this perfect instrument for cold war and diplomatic realpolitik metastasized into Oval Office paranoia, CREEP and Watergate."

Fitzgerald, not shielded by the expired Independent Counsel statute, cannot issue a report based on grand jury information. If he were to release a report -- which can only be based on what he found in the grand jury proceedings -- he would be breaking the law. He must either issue indictments or go quietly. And a special prosecutor who opens a new website, as Fitzgerald did last Friday, isn't planning on going quietly. If Fitzgerald chooses to cross the bright line between politics and criminal behavior, he can try to criminalize the WHIG's activities and damage not just this president but all who come after.

President Bush -- with the Fitzgerald investigation coming to a close, with the Miers nomination in real trouble, and everything else on his plate, including the UN, Syria, and the war in Iraq -- vowed to not be distracted by the "background noise" and "chatter" surrounding his political woes. He can fulfill this promise only if he takes decisive action to replace any part of his team that is knocked out by indictments.

If Rove or Libby or others are indicted, they will have to leave the administration at least until the end of the criminal trials. In that time, the president can be weakened by their departure and the press feeding frenzy that is sure to accelerate daily, or he can replace them with equally strong people who can get his presidency back on track. Karen Hughes, wasted as the ambassador at large to the Muslim world, can be brought back in a top position. C. Boyden Gray (whose ambassadorship is held up by a frivolous Senate "hold" on his nomination) could be brought in as White House chief of staff to replace the tired Andy Card. And others, loyal to Mr. Bush and his agenda, frustrated by the stagnation and ineptness of the White House, can come in to restore the authority and leadership role the Bush administration must have if it is to do anything in the next three years. In chaos there is opportunity. It will be Mr. Bush's choice to remain under fire or take charge again and move out.

TAS contributing editor Jed Babbin is the author of Inside the Asylum: Why the UN and Old Europe Are Worse Than You Think (Regnery, 2004).


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: andycard; cboydengray; cialeak; cialeake; fitzgerald; georgewbush; indictment; jedbabbin; judithmiller; karenhughes; karlrove; msm; scooterlibby; valerieplame; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2005 10:54:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Fitzgerald is worse than the week of 9/11?

... Right.


2 posted on 10/23/2005 10:54:50 PM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Thursday right? Then we'll all know and stop all this--"i didn't study for the test" anxiety


3 posted on 10/23/2005 11:13:35 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is really frustrating. The Bush justice department and Robert Ray dropped the ball on Hillary . They have not reopened OKC. Sandy Burglar gets a slap on the wrist. Able Danger is just hanging in mid air. Yet, this non-event becomes significant.

Tom DeLay gets indicted, while Hillary's $1.6 million FEC fraud is ignored. It is a Bizarro world. The MSM must die soon if this nation is to be saved.

4 posted on 10/23/2005 11:14:11 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

crock of doo doo.


5 posted on 10/23/2005 11:21:40 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I find it hard to believe that Rove or Libby, while receiving the advice of top attorneys, could have committed perjury or obstructed justice in this investigation. They and their lawyers are too smart to make that mistake. On the other hand, I have to wonder why Fitzgerald needs a website if he's not going to indict anyone. So it looks like someone may be indicted, but I still doubt that it will be any top White House officials. That leaves people in the media and at the CIA. This week will be an interesting time...no doubt about it.


6 posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:20 PM PDT by defenderSD (Unfortunately, I had to sell all rights to my tagline to pay my federal & state income taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I'm with you, Doug. Any ideas? This is an attempt not just to hurt the President, but to cause serious harm to the nation. That's what they've wanted for some time now.


7 posted on 10/23/2005 11:27:11 PM PDT by Just Lori (Tony Schaeffer, Curt Weldon, Able Danger....... PAY ATTENTION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori
We have a president who wanted to set a different tone. He let the drunken lifeguard take credit for an education bill. Then we watched his outrageous attacks. We watched the president say nice things about Hillary. We watched her outrageous attacks. We watched the president put the rapist back in the spotlight for tsunami and Katrina relief. Then that traitorous bastard attacks his foreign policy and makes it more dangerous for our troops.

Their side plays hardball using grenades. Bush and his team are still in softball mode as if we can get along with those people.

8 posted on 10/23/2005 11:32:03 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The better question. Would President Bush be better off without Rove? Also he still has a lot to accomplish. Reform the UN, the CIA, The State Department, The FBI. Iraq War, Israel, N.K. When it comes to domestic issues, The Republicans in Congress still have to be elected so they will come up with bills to make them look good with the base. For the Dem's, Rush does his show with half his brain tied behind his back. So if they think Rove is the Presidents brain.
9 posted on 10/23/2005 11:35:59 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
>>>>Their side plays hardball using grenades. Bush and his team are still in softball mode as if we can get along with those people.

There was a time when the Bush cheerleaders and BushBots said the nonconfrontational governing style of the President was part of his overall "strategery". I guess that's now passe.

10 posted on 10/23/2005 11:37:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Fitzgerald is worse than the week of 9/11? ... Right.

...duh...remember, we're talking POLITICS here! In the week of 9/11, the nation was united behind the President. It could be argued it was the BEST week of his presidency.

This article isn't talking about worst tragedies. It's talking about the nuts-and-bolts POLITICAL game.

11 posted on 10/23/2005 11:39:18 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Feel the same frustration. I am not worried about Tom Delay. He is already on the offensive and will make his prosecutor pulp.

I hope the Whitehouse will get in-the-face to beat back at the Wilson fraud?


12 posted on 10/23/2005 11:43:51 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paulat
....duh...remember, we're talking POLITICS here!

So the most lethal terrorist attack in modern history was NOT potentially the worst week in the presidency in terms of the political ramifications of a president somehow allowing said attack to occur? You'll recall that the Democrats tried that crap for YEARS.

It's talking about the nuts-and-bolts POLITICAL game.

It's talking about an investigation which we know absolutely NOTHING about. How hard is this to understand? WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT FITZGERALD'S INVESTIGATION. Last week was supposed to be the worst week in Bush's presidency. And the week before that. FOR THE EXACT SAME REASON.

Please, grow a brain.
13 posted on 10/23/2005 11:51:26 PM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I have said for years that Karl Rove isn't now nor ever was a genius. Let me take this opportunity to welcome many other people to the bandwagon.

If Rove were nearly as smart as people give him credit for being, he would have successfully managed the true story about Joe Wilson without putting his own neck -- and the reputation of the administration -- in jeopardy. If he is indicted, I won't miss him. And if he's the best the Bush Admin can do, they better get wear gas masks and hip boots around the West Wing; the you-know-what storm is just beginning.

What the White House needs is someone who knows how to get into the media's face and say, "You won't report the good news on your own, so here I am to tell you about it." For example, Lawrence Kudlow, the financial expert and CNBC host. He has constantly been on the case of Card, Rove, and McClellan for their refusal to be assertive about the Administration's accomplishments, always back on their heels and mumbling before the likes of Helen Thomas, Terry "Sweet Lips" Moran and David Gregory (except in the case of Harriet Miers, which had McClellan finally showing some righteous indignation -- too bad he didn't have a leg to stand on).

Listening to Kudlow as a guest on the Laura Ingraham show suggesting strategies for the Bush Admin is exhilarating and frustrating, since he knows of what he speaks, but you know that nobody who could make a difference will listen.

14 posted on 10/24/2005 12:04:06 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Harriet Miers < John Roberts < Antonin Scalia. Do the math. http://lnsmitheeblog.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Maybe one good thing will come out of all this Plame-gate BS. The old quote: Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate. This White House will wake up one day soon after the MSM and Democrats have done everything to destroy this administration (not just attack but literally take down) and realize it is time to get serious about political offense.
15 posted on 10/24/2005 12:05:52 AM PDT by Garry Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

BUMP


16 posted on 10/24/2005 12:06:59 AM PDT by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
So the most lethal terrorist attack in modern history was NOT potentially the worst week in the presidency in terms of the political ramifications of a president somehow allowing said attack to occur?

...again...DUH!!! It happened less than 9 months into a new presidency. The nation was smarter than you are. It was not going to blame a new president for something that was obviously brewing under a previous regime.

...obviously, by your gender and your reasoning, you need to grow something else, LOL!!!

17 posted on 10/24/2005 12:12:46 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Their side plays hardball using grenades. Bush and his team are still in softball mode as if we can get along with those people.

Don't forget that he started out the first week by covering up the looting of Air Force One and the vandalizing of the White House by the outgoing staff. This is the payback for being nice.

18 posted on 10/24/2005 12:17:03 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paulat
The nation was smarter than you are.

Wow. You think I actually believe 9/11 was a TRUE political clusterf***, rather than having had the potential to be one? And then you decide to throw an insult out? Okay. Let's go over this:

The point of this posted article is to whine and cry that Bush is going to have the worst week of his presidency, due to Fitzgerald's investigation. This overlooks two key points:


And here I thought the "Miers sucks! No, shut up!" crap was annoying.
19 posted on 10/24/2005 12:18:06 AM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Most people don't care if Karl Rove and/or Scooter Libby get indicted (if they even have a clue who they are).

They are busy getting ready for the holiday season, raising their family and paying taxes. It was different when Clinton was being impeached because Clinton was lying about having sex with an intern in the oval office, under oath, as President of the United States.

If the MSM, Democrats and/or liberal moon-bat kooks think this will harm President Bush they need to reassess.

20 posted on 10/24/2005 12:28:29 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson