Skip to comments.
Wisconsin may open private spaceport
UPI ^
| 10/21/05
Posted on 10/23/2005 12:31:33 PM PDT by KevinDavis
MADISON, Wis., Oct. 21 (UPI) -- Wisconsin legislators are promoting a plan to create a spaceport in the country's top cheese-making state.
The proposal would set up a nine-member Wisconsin Aerospace Authority to promote the state among private entrepreneurs planning to go extraterrestrial, the Wisconsin State Journal reported. Sheboygan would be the state's Houston, allowing failed rockets to fall into Lake Michigan.
Bob Cook, head of the Wisconsin Transportation Development Association, thinks the plan has some lift.
"As long as there's not much state money involved, I think it makes sense," Cook said. "There's an industry out there that's growing and it's smart to do what we can to try to take advantage."
He said the federal government appears to have lost interest in NASA, creating space, as it were, for the private sector.
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: cheddarhead; cheeseheads; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: KevinDavis
This is mission control in Sheboygan. Today's launch has been cancelled due to a snow day.
21
posted on
10/23/2005 2:10:03 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: KevinDavis
Wisconsin legislators are promoting a plan to create a spaceport in the country's top cheese-making state.Odd choice of words for the reporter. Is he under the impression that Wisconsin's building this thing in order to export cheese to new interplanetary markets?
22
posted on
10/23/2005 2:50:25 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Paleo Conservative
Very interesting. Just talked to the Director of Public Utilities of Sheboygan and there IS talk of building the Space Port in the Armory building there! They are trying to secure funding for it. There is no talk of a runway or landing in the Lake, however. ROFLMAO!!!! My friends back there are now thinking of building a tower on their house to watch the shuttle landings and wonder when tsunami warnings will be posted along the lakeshore. LOL
23
posted on
10/23/2005 2:56:31 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
To: manwiththehands
Another reason to put launch facilities as close to the equator as possible (i.e. Florida) has something to do with the amount of fuel required to reach orbit velocity. If you launch from the equator it takes less fuel than if you launched from Wisconsin.The difference isn't that much. The earth rotates at about 0.46 km per second at the equator. The difference between Wisconsin and Florida can't be any more than one third of that. Minimum orbital velocity, by contrast, is 8 km per second.
24
posted on
10/23/2005 3:06:02 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: phantomworker
There is no talk of a runway or landing in the Lake, however. ROFLMAO!!!!Since this is being designed for private entrepreneurs, I'm guessing they're not doing it with Space Shuttle-type vehicles in mind. If there are humans going up in these things, I would assume that the method of coming back down to the surface will involve mostly parachutes.
25
posted on
10/23/2005 3:14:42 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: KevinDavis
Closer to the equator, less inclined orbit...
26
posted on
10/23/2005 3:16:01 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The fault, dear Brutus, lies not with the Stars, but within ourselves)
To: Paleo Conservative
Notice that French Guyana is one of the few places on land in the world that can be used for launching rockets into both equitorial and polar orbits without having to overfly inhabited areas. So what's Hawai'i? Chopped liver????
27
posted on
10/23/2005 3:17:40 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The fault, dear Brutus, lies not with the Stars, but within ourselves)
To: null and void
So what's Hawai'i? Chopped liver???? It's one of the other few spots on the Earth that is good for both quitorial and polar launches. I never said Guyana was the only such place. It probably wasn't considered in the 1950's and 60's because of it's distance from the US mainland. There are currently private sector proposals to build launch facilities there.
28
posted on
10/23/2005 3:34:39 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: inquest
Since this is being designed for private entrepreneurs, I'm guessing they're not doing it with Space Shuttle-type vehicles in mind. If there are humans going up in these things, I would assume that the method of coming back down to the surface will involve mostly parachutes. I think you are serious. What type of vehicles do you think they have in mind?
29
posted on
10/23/2005 3:36:15 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
To: phantomworker
Stuff similar to what the X-Prize people used, I guess. The impression I'm getting here is that Wisconsin wants to get a leg up on this space tourism business. I do know that the winner of the X-Prize wants to open up such a business. Last I heard, he's already booking reservations for $200,000 a seat, which is well within the range of a lot of rich people. It's only a trip up into space and then back down (it doesn't even circle the earth), but it's a start. If it turns out to be profitable, it could quite possibly expand to orbital flights and beyond.
30
posted on
10/23/2005 3:43:47 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: RightWhale
There would be no advantage in polar launches by using an equatorial site versus an Alaskan site. Except that a private company trying to conserve capital could be able to launch satellites in any orbit from one site at no additional cost.
31
posted on
10/23/2005 3:58:30 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: inquest
That actually makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the insight. :)
32
posted on
10/23/2005 4:11:12 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Can anybody see moving their launch to Alaska for any other reason than to achieve a high latitude orbit in the first place? The fuel cost to launch would be the same since all that equatorial velocity wouldn't be wasted. It would be an automatic tourism selling point: see the whole world from Alaska, not just that soul-stultifying equatorial band.
33
posted on
10/23/2005 4:12:58 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
To: Larry Lucido
If it's true, that the moon really is made of cheese, what's going to become of all the cheese-makers in WI?
35
posted on
10/23/2005 4:45:55 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
To: inquest; All
Wisconsin legislators are promoting a plan to create a spaceport in the country's top cheese-making state. Odd choice of words for the reporter. Is he under the impression that Wisconsin's building this thing in order to export cheese to new interplanetary markets?
Not so far-fetched. Similiar to when Kraft was trying to expand into the Middle-Eastern markets. Opened a subsidiary called "Cheeses of Nazareth".
36
posted on
10/23/2005 5:34:26 PM PDT
by
olde north church
($3.00 for one head of lettuce is a better bargain than $1000s for the body of one illegal alien.)
To: olde north church
Oh, that's just wrong...
37
posted on
10/23/2005 5:39:12 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: phantomworker; All
Why limit vehicle design to those from launch pads when the easiest solution is to launch from piggy-backing off high altitude aircraft?
38
posted on
10/23/2005 5:41:23 PM PDT
by
olde north church
($3.00 for one head of lettuce is a better bargain than $1000s for the body of one illegal alien.)
To: inquest
Oh, that's just wrong... Agree. LOLROFLMAO!
39
posted on
10/23/2005 5:44:37 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
To: olde north church
Why limit vehicle design to those from launch pads when the easiest solution is to launch from piggy-backing off high altitude aircraft? Didn't NASA launch a super-sonic vehicle like that a while ago?
40
posted on
10/23/2005 5:46:30 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(Seize this very minute... Boldness has genius, power and magic in it... Begin it now!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson