Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: Will's Dud Nuke
The American Spectator ^ | Sunday, October 23, 2005 @ 12:12:23 PM | Wlady Pleszczynski

Posted on 10/23/2005 10:04:04 AM PDT by Oklahoma

Jed is so right. I've read George Will's hotly hyped Sunday column several times now, and it's worse than a dud. Maybe it's the drippy, rainy weather we've had here, but I can't cut through the foggy posturing to figure out what his larger point really is. Let me get my towel out and dry his text off.

Two things are clear from the start: Will regards Miers' nomination as act of "perfect perversity." And he says that her defenders, in stark contrast to himself, lack "constitutional understanding." They cause people like him to "cringe" when he sees them trying to defend her. He thus has no use for the "incense defense" (I didn't know George has Know Nothing tendencies). Who cares, he says, if she's "pious" -- religion has nothing to do with, that term again, "constitutional understanding." Anyway, he finds these defenders "so crudely obsessed with abortion" that they apparently would overturn Roe v. Wade for the wrong reasons. Those less crudely obsessed with abortion he equates with "thoughtful conservatives," whose "highest aim" is to "replace semi-legislative reasoning with genuine constitutional reasoning about the Constitution's meaning." (Your assignment for Monday, class, is to compare and contrast "constitutional reasoning" and "constitutional understanding.")

I could go on, but do I have to? It is interesting that at the end of he says "any Republican senator who supinely acquiesces in President Bush's reckless abuse of presidential discretion" and backs Miers will "never be considered presidential material." Reasoning and understanding have given way to bluster.

I was actually most struck by his attack on unsophisticated critics of Roe v. Wade, because it's a sobering reminder that some of Miers' most hostile attackers aren't particularly active pro-lifers. They have an intellectual agenda, but not a Right to Life one. David Frum, who has led the anti-Miers contingent, let it be known a few years ago that he is definitely pro-choice on first trimester abortions. And he told readers not to write to him about this because his mind is made up. Dahlia Lithwick, who writes on Supreme Court issues for Slate, has detetected a split on abortion in the Miers matter between the evangelical pro-lifers and the legal "process" right. The moral urgency the former display is clearly missing among the latter. To George Will and Co., Roe 's sin apparently comes down to form, not content. That's the problem with snobs.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushbotbait; georgewill; miers; pleszczynski; scotus
Turns out some of the people at "American Spectator" think George has turned into a crank, too.
1 posted on 10/23/2005 10:04:04 AM PDT by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

It's the bow tie. He reminds them of Carlson.


2 posted on 10/23/2005 10:17:04 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

He is also 2nd amendment.


3 posted on 10/23/2005 10:21:23 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
My heroes are all conservative republicans and I have many.I have always stated that George Will is a total A-HOLE.I don't consider him a conservative or a republican.IMHO he is nothing more than a dirty democrat.He really likes the sound of his own voice.

You can have all the token republicans in the MSM.You can generally find them writing op ed`s against the Prez in the NY Times and Washington post etc.

just my 2 cents...don't hate me
4 posted on 10/23/2005 10:22:15 AM PDT by presidentsfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidentsfriend

I don't hate you. I have a lot of respect for a President who is planting Democracy, sharing our blessings, against hateful odds, in a land of tyrants.

I don't agree with his border policy, but I can separate that from the Iraq project. If he gets nothing else done, and Iraq stays free, history will remember this President as a man with guts.


5 posted on 10/23/2005 10:43:52 AM PDT by RoadTest (Call Orkin Pest Control! We've got VERMIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
George Will turned on George Herbert Walker Bush too. Wlady is right though. Will would consider most of us dumb Republicans because we haven't been to the right schools (Princeton), and we don't get our underwear starched, like he does. He's really all about the form and not about the substance on this one. It's too bad, normally one can overlook his pontificating since at least he's usually right. Defeating an anti-abortion, God-fearing conservative for the pedantic reasons Will writes of tells me he could use a nuclear wedgie. Now, go, George Will, and sin no more.
6 posted on 10/23/2005 11:07:29 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (MSM: de facto allies of America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
The worst case is Thomas Oliphant, a/k/a Bow Tie Daddy.
7 posted on 10/23/2005 11:13:02 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
I doubt too many people read the ponderous results of Will's labors, anyhow.

I think I have a pretty good knowledge of the English language. But for years, wading through George's convoluted paragraphs, deeply-murky sentences and deliberately-academic words, I usually give up after stoutly finishing about a third of his product.

He may influence his ivory-tower peers, but not the average Joe down the street.

The average Joes and Janes I interact with every day are into the business of living. They're marginally aware of the brouhaha, but are not into the raging battles going on over Miers' nomination. They're not wrapped tight like the politicians, the media and internet bloggers and forums.

The President's personal popularity reigns, and with shrugs, Joe and Jane feel he should get his choice and they simply just trust him. And no, Mr. Will, these are not uneducated peasants all down the street. Their street is just Main St. USA, not Pennsylvania Avenue, DC or Park Ave., NYC.

You may know baseball, but how many times do you sit with the Bleacher Bums?

Leni

8 posted on 10/23/2005 11:30:56 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Re: The Anti-War Sheehan-ites - They want to live in the garden but not tend the garden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
"Will writes of tells me he could use a nuclear wedgie. Now, go, George Will, and sin no more."

Bahahahaha!!

I would rather read your stuff then Will's.

He's taken to kissing up to his Washingtonian audience.

9 posted on 10/23/2005 12:54:07 PM PDT by Earthdweller (If Miers turns out to be the anti-Roe vote that could have been..Blame the NRO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
"You may know baseball, but how many times do you sit with the Bleacher Bums?"

Or step up to the plate?

10 posted on 10/23/2005 10:09:20 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson