Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Water Mills: Tapping the Power of Rivers, Streams, and Tidal Basins
FineTuning.com ^ | October 11, 2005 | by Mark R. Whittington

Posted on 10/22/2005 11:09:01 AM PDT by aculeus

Just as high-tech windmills tap the power of wind to generate electricity, a new water-mill technology promises to efficiently tap the flow of water in rivers, streams, and tidal basins. It could be a new source of clean, renewable, and unobtrusive energy.

The quest for clean, renewable energy has resulted in a number of interesting technologies. One of the newest is now being tested; it's called Instream Energy Generation Technology or free flow hydro power. It’s a technology that promises to tap energy wherever there is a river, stream, canal, or any place where water flows. What is Instream Energy Generation Technology?

Instream Energy Generation Technology or IEGT places turbines in rivers, manmade channels, tidal waters, or ocean currents. These turbines use the flow of water to turn them, thus generating electricity for the power grid on nearby land. In effect, IEGT is like planting windmills in the water and is environmentally friendly. Types of Turbines

There are several types of turbines available, depending on the characteristic of the water site and other needs. The axial flow rotor turbine consists of a concentric hub with radial blades, resembling a wind mill. Either a built in electrical generator or a hydraulic pump which turns an electrical generator on land provides the electricity.

The open center fan turbine consists of two donut shape turbines which rotate in the opposite direction of the current. This in turn runs a hydraulic pump that in turn drives a standard electrical generator.

A helical turbine resembles a strange sculpture with hydrofoil sections that keep the turbine oriented to the flow of the water. The leader edge of the blades turns in the direction of the water.

The cycloidic turbine resembles a paddle wheel, where the flow of the water turns the wheel with lift and drag being optimized.

Lift or Flutter Vanes looks like a huge Venetian blind. Hydroplane blades are caused to oscillate by the flowing water, thus generating electricity. Advantages of IEGT Power

IEGT clearly provides electricity from a renewable resource, in this case water flow, without recourse to burning any type of fuel. Unlike standard hydroelectricity, IEGT does not involve the construction of a large infrastructure, the damming of rivers or streams, or the diversion of any water ways. IEGT can, however, be used in existing water systems controlled by dams or other structures.

Besides the generation of power, IEGT can be used for other water projects. These include desalination, the creation of potable water, and the extraction of hydrogen from water for use in fuel cells.

IEGT is claimed by its proponents to have little or no impact on the environment. The turbine blades rotate slowly enough and are space apart far enough so that migrating fish will not be affected. Environmental groups such as Riverkeeper in New York dispute this, claiming that scientific evidence is not yet available to support the conclusion of no environmental impact. The East River Project

A company called Verdant Power is testing an IEGT system in the East River, between Manhattan and Roosevelt Island. The first phase, which consisted of a single axial flow rotor turbine, with ten foot diameter rotors, anchored in concrete attached to the river bed. The turbine was not only able to capture the energy from the natural flow of the river, but from tidal currents which can reach 4 knots. The single turbine was able to generate up to 16 kilowatts of power.

As a result of this first phase of the East River Project, Verdant Power is preparing to deploy six single axial flow turbines, with five meter diameter rotors, in the tidal basin of the East River. This system, when installed, will actually generate electricity for the New York power grid. Eventually, Verdant plans to deploy several hundred turbines, generating 5 to 10 megawatts, providing power for New York City. Other Projects

Verdant is also testing other turbine technologies in the US Navy David Taylor Model Basin in Carderock, Maryland. The basin, located close to the company’s corporate headquarters, permits rapid prototyping, fluid dynamic studies, and model testing.

Verdant is planning a one megawatt system using the helical turbine in the Merrimack River in Massachusetts. If successful, the system can be replicated in other rivers and streams in the state.

The Tennessee Valley Authority has asked Verdant to evaluate the feasibility of deploying IEGT plants in the waterways within the TVA’s domain. Characteristics such as water flow rate, water depth, river bottom topography, as well as proximity to power grid connections have to be determined before the economic feasibility of such projects can be ascertained.

The company is also evaluating the possibility of projects in aqueducts in California and tidal basins in the United Kingdom.

A Norwegian Company called Hammerfest Strøm is developing IEGT type technology to be deployed in tidal basins and other water ways in Norway. A British company called Marine Current Turbines has just completed a pilot project off Lynmouth in Devon that has generated 300 kilowatts of power. The next phase will be a system generating one megawatt, followed by a full commercial system generating ten megawatts of electricity. MCT is looking at other, similar projects in North America, South East Asia, Australia, and New Zealand.

A pilot project called the Snail, under the auspices of Robert Gordon University in Scotland, is being prepared to capture the tidal energies in Eynhallow Sound in Orkney. It is expected that similar devices would be commercially useful in the sea lochs in Western Scotland as well as channels between the Orkney and Shetland islands.

The Future of IEGT

The concept of planning turbines on the beds of rivers, streams, and tidal basins seems to be an excellent addition to the mix of energy technologies that will eventually free the world from dependence on fossil fuels, which cause pollution and are often found in politically unstable parts of the world. Of course more research and development will be needed to establish the economic viability of the technology, as well as to allay the concerns of some groups about potential environmental impacts. If the technology is seen to be viable, then a time may come when the waterways of the world will become a source of clean, renewable, and unobtrusive energy.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: energy; hydropower; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: glorgau

True, but some of the cost of electricity is transmission and storage - put some power generation close to the power consumer, the electric company saves money. Also, no need to continue buying fuel to power the thing.


21 posted on 10/22/2005 12:04:16 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
A company called Verdant Power is testing an IEGT system in the East River, between Manhattan and Roosevelt Island. The first phase, which consisted of a single axial flow rotor turbine, with ten foot diameter rotors, anchored in concrete attached to the river bed. The turbine was not only able to capture the energy from the natural flow of the river, but from tidal currents which can reach 4 knots. The single turbine was able to generate up to 16 kilowatts of power.

No fish there, just get tangled in the bodies as they flow into the harbor.

All seriousness, this is a great idea that for a very small outlay generate power. Even a small amount adds up as has been noted. I'd love to see a Nuke Plant in every state but we all know how long that would take.
22 posted on 10/22/2005 12:17:34 PM PDT by Recon Dad ( Now to be known as Force Recon Dad (and proud of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
" The single turbine was able to generate up to 16 kilowatts of power."

That is just enough to supply about 2-3 households at most, you would need thousands of these sushi-ginzu's to compare with a couple of the new pebble bed nuke reactors, I think we should just put the money in small reactors around the country and call it a day.

23 posted on 10/22/2005 12:42:56 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stboz

Someone already suggested that for Flori-DUH?...But the Sierra Club said diverting the stream would "Chill Out" the UK and has sought an injunction to halt Flori-Duh's even thinking about it! LOL.......


24 posted on 10/22/2005 12:45:40 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
Wait 'till the equivalent of the windmill birdkill shows up!

Diced Flipper?!

25 posted on 10/22/2005 12:49:23 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

There are hidden contradictions in the minds of people who "love Nature" while deploring the "artificialities" with which "Man has spoiled 'Nature.' " The obvious contradiction lies in their choice of words, which imply that Man and his artifacts are not part of "Nature", but beavers and their dams are. But the contradictions go deeper than this prima-facie absurdity. In declaring his love for a beaver dam (erected by beavers for beavers' purposes) and his hatred for dams erected by men (for the purposes of men) the "Naturist" reveals his hatred for his own race, i.e. his own self-hatred. In the case,of "Naturists" such self-hatred is understandable; they are such a sorry lot. But hatred is too strong an emotion to feel toward them; pity and contempt are the most they rate. As for me, willy-nilly I am a man, not a beaver, and H. sapiens is the only race I have or can have. Fortunately for me, I like being part of a race made up of men and women, it strikes me as a fine arrangement and perfectly "natural."

ROBERT HEINLEIN


26 posted on 10/22/2005 12:49:58 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (I shot an error into the air. It's still going everywhere. R. A. HEINLEIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
You could stick not one of these in a river but hundreds or thousands and much bigger. The water would just flow through all of them. Nothing wrong with Nukes, but it will be easier to drill off the coast of Florida than to build a Nuke. Hey, if it were up to me we'd be eating Snail Darters.
27 posted on 10/22/2005 12:53:17 PM PDT by Recon Dad ( Now to be known as Force Recon Dad (and proud of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Can they make a miniature one for my toilet?
28 posted on 10/22/2005 12:55:20 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Put some really large ones in the gulf stream.


29 posted on 10/22/2005 2:50:47 PM PDT by Ninian Dryhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Can they make a miniature one for my toilet?

Yes.

Once they're flush.

30 posted on 10/22/2005 4:30:53 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Cool. Bumpmark.


31 posted on 10/22/2005 7:12:50 PM PDT by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Well, you're right. But there are some hobbyists here who daydream of personal energy sustainability--it's not just enviro-nuts. It's backwoodsmen (women) nuts...


32 posted on 10/22/2005 7:16:56 PM PDT by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

No argument with 'hobbyists' or 'individualists'. I've lived off-grid, with a generator, and even in one creekside place with a Pelton wheel generation setup.

The new house will (legally) use a high efficiency coal fired furnace, and I've toyed with the idea of a small boiler to power a generator. Coal is cheap & easy for me to obtain locally.

Even now, though we are on the grid, we still have three (two 8KW, and a third, 5KW) generators. That is more capacity than the single East River turbine, for a heck of a lot less money; I could probably pay for a life time's worth of fuel for what it cost to purchase & install that thing. They are talking kilowatts, not megawatts, except when they get into their huge arrays of hundreds of the larger units.

The problem is, like using "waste cooking oil", what works for one or a few is not feasible for millions.
Or, Mother Earth News' wood powered pickup back in the 1970s. It ran, and ran well; they drove all over the country as a demo...BUT several million woodburners on the highway would be a pollution nightmare, as well as drive the cost of wood through the roof.

Nukes work, and they are cost effective, and efficient for mass production of energy. These boutique things are either write-offs, grant-scams, or 'demonstreation projects; but they have the down side of drawing attention of regulators to the quiet individualist.


33 posted on 10/22/2005 9:30:00 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Mohamophages of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: caryatid; aculeus
" ...an IEGT system in the East River, between Manhattan and Roosevelt Island. The first phase, which consisted of a single axial flow rotor turbine, with ten foot diameter rotors, anchored in concrete attached to the river bed."

They don't fool me. They've discovered at last where Jimmy Hoffa is buried, and they're tapping into the energy as he spins in his grave.

34 posted on 10/22/2005 11:14:48 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (George asked me for the best poet... I looked and looked ... I couldn't find anyone better than me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

LOL


35 posted on 10/22/2005 11:26:27 PM PDT by caryatid (The world according to Calvin and Hobbes ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson