Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7
You wrote~~~~~"Plame was not an agent under the law concerned"

Finally someone said it.
So why hasn't the NYT said it? /sarc

81 posted on 10/20/2005 7:54:51 PM PDT by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: daybreakcoming

The New York Times hasn't said it because the New York Times is a Propaganda Rag that invents news. In this case the NYT wants to bring down President Bush.Its a po0litical hack rag. They are a disgrace. The woman who wrote the law says that there is no crime.


See http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=20&artnum=2&issue=20051019:


............There is no crime, according to attorney Victoria Toensing, who drafted the legislation in her role as chief counsel for the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. She says that under the statute the "outed" agent must have operated outside the U.S. within the previous five years, and Plame had given up her role as a covert agent in favor of a desk job in Langley, Va., nine years before the Rove interview, according to New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof............


108 posted on 10/20/2005 8:03:46 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson