Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bring it on!!!!
1 posted on 10/20/2005 7:18:03 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: frankjr

This is an unmitigated disaster and could ultimately lead to the impeachment of President Bush.


2 posted on 10/20/2005 7:19:49 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

damn it drudge, its been developed.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506381/posts


5 posted on 10/20/2005 7:22:16 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Let the NYT play out their little game.

They are as dirty as anyone in this whole affair.

The Old Gray lady is about to go belly up, imo, and good riddance.


6 posted on 10/20/2005 7:22:58 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

I thought you were not to discuss an ongoing investigation?


10 posted on 10/20/2005 7:24:54 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( Member of the Water Bucket Brigade - It's all about MOOSEMUSS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Just a question regarding this leak thing. Yesterday a woman called into the HH show and mentioned that she'd read Judith Miller's book Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War a few years back and seemed to recall that Miller had claimed to extensive research on the topic which, according to the promo material that is easily found on websites the book is sold through includes "hundreds of interviews with scientists and senior officials, including President Clinton"...now is it not correct that this would include the same section of the CIA that Valerie Plame worked for? Is it possible or even likely that Judith Miller became familiar with Valerie Plame sometime between 1997 and 2001 as this book was being researched? If so, how can something be leaked that she already knew? Just tossing out the question.
22 posted on 10/20/2005 7:32:05 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Bring it ON ! You betcha!

Anyone with a mind devoid of wing nuts would know that
this alternative version of history spouted by Wilson, Plame and all the Dem running dogs is just smear propaganda. Yousee the dems still believe after 2 elections that Bush somehow stole both elections. He is the first " Illigitimate" US President, and Demagogue democrat prosecutors are sharpening their dullest knives
to take the republican election machine apart.

Of course liberal judges will have their supposed parts to play. The Bush administration is about to declare political war on these reality challeneged Dems. Watch the manure hit the fan over the next several weeks.

No way that any indictment of Rove will make it past a preliminary hearing. ZAP! Plame was not an agent under the law concerned. No Indictment will be issued and if there is one, something stinks in Denmark!


26 posted on 10/20/2005 7:33:16 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

The "pucker factor" is high. The roster of actual indictments will tell the tale, but this is dangerous ground.


31 posted on 10/20/2005 7:34:41 PM PDT by Petronski (The word "cyborg" to me means complete love and incredible fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Marvelous. And I already thought Chris Matthews was off his meds... this'll send him over the friggin' edge.


32 posted on 10/20/2005 7:35:06 PM PDT by alancarp (Will hack code for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Here's an interesting take:

Judith Miller Exonerates Bush Officials

By Cliff Kincaid | October 16, 2005

"The media, of course, are not interested in probing Wilson and Plame, only the Bush administration. The true facts in the CIA-leak case are now becoming astonishingly clear. New York Times reporter Judith Miller's testimony, as she describes it in the Sunday edition of her paper, proves that the wrong people are under investigation. It's not really a story about Bush officials Lewis Libby and Karl Rove and their conversations with the press. Rather, it's a story about a CIA bureaucracy working to undermine the Bush administration through the media and cover up for its own mistakes."


http://www.aim.org/special_report/4096_0_8_0_C


37 posted on 10/20/2005 7:36:29 PM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

The average citizen doesn't look beyond the headlines. Pretty soon the MSM will be throwing around the term "administration corruption" based on all of the manufactured or magnified "crimes" supposedly committed by people connected to the administration, or Republicans in Congress. They'll be calling for impeachment, and if that doesn't work, they'll at least succeed in paving the way for a democrat President in '08. It's all mapped out, and it will succeed if the electorate doesn't start looking beyond headlines and sound bites.


39 posted on 10/20/2005 7:37:16 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Every time you use anonymous sources, God kills a kitten. Please, think of the kittens.


52 posted on 10/20/2005 7:41:58 PM PDT by RichInOC (...oops, did I say that out loud?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Can anyone cite a time in the past 6 years when Democrats overreached and it didn't come back and bite them in the butt?

Try as I might, I can't recall one time when Bush, under relentless attack, didn't come up smelling like a rose and the Democrats didn't end up with egg all over their faces.

Just sit tight. This time will be no exception and will be fun to watch.


67 posted on 10/20/2005 7:47:30 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy

One for jay-walking, and the other for spitting on the sidewalk.

72 posted on 10/20/2005 7:50:43 PM PDT by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Can't wait for the indictments to come down for all the Clintonistas who trashed their enemies - and let's include Ms. Hillary in that group. American politics has really come down to a bunch of horse shit.


101 posted on 10/20/2005 8:01:20 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Bring it on!!!!

Best watch what you ask for.

111 posted on 10/20/2005 8:04:50 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

watching Tucker Carlson live on MSNBC:


Lawrence O'Donnell tells Tucker Carlson he expected perjury charges or lying to FBI agents.
that's separate crimes.

O'Donnell says Rove did not tell FBI he had a conversation with Matt Cooper.

Possible Charges "peripheral to the issue he was appointed to investigate

Tucker Carlson says Fitzgerald knows the identify of the original leaker to Novak, and it isn't someone inside the White House.


122 posted on 10/20/2005 8:07:31 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@ Pins And Needles.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Well, the crack addicts in Texas indicted Tom DeLay today for not commiting a crime, I don't see why Rove and Libby can't be indicted. The Commie pigs down at the DNC are trying to prove that the phrase "you can indict a ham sandwich" is not a myth.


154 posted on 10/20/2005 8:15:46 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We Gave Peace A Chance. It Didn't Work Out. Search keyword: 09-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
WAKEUP AMERICA!
Click Here for
Hanoi Kerry
Timeline of a traitor,
includes FBI files



"If the Constitution says that the little guy should win,
the little guy's going to win in court before me.
But if the Constitution says that the big guy should win, well,
then the big guy's going to win,
because my obligation is to the Constitution.
That's the oath," he said.

Judge John Roberts 09/15/05


See You hanoi kerry!
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts
knows U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
He has a lifetime appointnment
and can't be put under political pressure, by anyone.
He's taken an oath to uphold the Constitution

Game's Over hanoi kerry!
There are only 99 legal votes in the US Senate!





158 posted on 10/20/2005 8:17:06 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Be wary of FReepers who preach and howl : Get over it Tonk. Move On! mmmm Move On as in Fat Boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Tramslate this article: Some friends of Wilson admit that neither the Agee Act nor Chapter 37 of the Espionage act apply, neither man has received a target letter, the gj is about to expire and maybe Rove and Libby will be charged with something else.

AND MAYBE NOT.

From the little there is on the public record, I say NOT.


231 posted on 10/20/2005 8:43:56 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Coulda, woulda, shoulda......
271 posted on 10/20/2005 8:56:05 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson