LOL, so how about some satire?
Posted on 10/19/2005 4:31:13 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
Of all the words written about Harriet Miers, none are more disturbing than the ones she wrote herself. In the early '90s, while she was president of the Texas bar association, Miers wrote a column called "President's Opinion" for The Texas Bar Journal. It is the largest body of public writing we have from her, and sad to say, the quality of thought and writing doesn't even rise to the level of pedestrian.
Of course, we have to make allowances for the fact that the first job of any association president is to not offend her members. Still, nothing excuses sentences like this:
"More and more, the intractable problems in our society have one answer: broad-based intolerance of unacceptable conditions and a commitment by many to fix problems."
Or this: "We must end collective acceptance of inappropriate conduct and increase education in professionalism."
Or this: "An organization must also implement programs to fulfill strategies established through its goals and mission. Methods for evaluation of these strategies are a necessity. With the framework of mission, goals, strategies, programs, and methods for evaluation in place, a meaningful budgeting process can begin."
Or, finally, this: "We have to understand and appreciate that achieving justice for all is in jeopardy before a call to arms to assist in obtaining support for the justice system will be effective. Achieving the necessary understanding and appreciation of why the challenge is so important, we can then turn to the task of providing the much needed support."
I don't know if by mere quotation I can fully convey the relentless march of vapid abstractions that mark Miers' prose. Nearly every idea is vague and depersonalized. Nearly every debatable point is elided. It's not that Miers didn't attempt to tackle interesting subjects. She wrote about unequal access to the justice system, about the underrepresentation of minorities in the law and about whether pro bono work should be mandatory. But she presents no arguments or ideas, except the repetition of the bromide that bad things can be eliminated if people of good will come together to eliminate bad things.
Or as she puts it, "There is always a necessity to tend to a myriad of responsibilities on a number of cases as well as matters not directly related to the practice of law." And yet, "Disciplining ourselves to provide the opportunity for thought and analysis has to rise again to a high priority."
Throw aside ideology. Surely the threshold skill required of a Supreme Court justice is the ability to write clearly and argue incisively. Miers' columns provide no evidence of that.
The Miers nomination has reopened the rift between conservatives and establishment Republicans.
The conservative movement was founded upon the supposition that ideas have consequences. Conservatives have founded so many think tanks, magazines and organizations, like the Federalist Society, because they believe that you have to win arguments to win political power. They dream of Supreme Court justices capable of writing brilliant opinions that will reshape the battle of ideas.
Republicans, who these days are as likely to belong to the corporate establishment as the evangelical establishment, are more suspicious of intellectuals and ideas, and more likely to believe that politics is about deal-making, loyalty and power. You know you are in establishment GOP circles when the conversation is bland but unifying. You know you are in conservative circles when it is interesting but divisive. Conservatives err by becoming irresponsible. Republicans tend to be blown about haplessly by forces they cannot understand.
For the first years of his presidency, George Bush healed the division between Republicans and conservatives by pursuing big conservative goals with ruthless Republican discipline. But Harriet Miers has shown no loyalty to conservative institutions like the Federalist Society. Her loyalty has been to the person of the president, and her mental style seems to be Republicanism on stilts.
So conservatives are caught between loyalty to their ideas and loyalty to the president they admire. Most of them have come out against Miers — quietly or loudly. Establishment Republicans are displaying their natural loyalty to leadership. And Miers is caught in the vise between these two forces, a smart and good woman who has been put in a position where she cannot succeed.
Stopping Roe-Wade is not the only issue. If Meir helps stop it that's fine. The question concerns where she goes from there. I see her liberal tendencies in her other positions. When she realizes the power she will have on the court her true colors will emerge. She and Souter will make a lovely couple.
All I know is that Miers is far superior to the psycho leftist anti American anti Constitution legislating from the bench justices that are sitting there now. People like Ginsberg and Breyer, Stevens and Souter.
LOL, so how about some satire?
I still say she was writing down to her audience. They're lawyers.
(Denny Crane: "Gun Control? For Communists. She's A Liberal. Can't Hunt".)
(Denny Crane: "Gun Control? For Communists. She's A Liberal. Can't Hunt".)
Whaaaaa...? I can't even understand what she's trying to say in those quotes. "Vague" is too kind a description.
Lately, in my office, we would call Miers' gibberish "stuck on stupid." But the original term is b___s___.
Where the heck did you find that?!?!?
I suggest trial by combat between the two factions to decide who gets to pick.
I can't tell you, because I'm planning to use the other pics... Ann Coulter's et al, LOL.
ROFL!! How about a game of cards instead? Maybe some PVP in a video game.
"...a smart and good woman who has been put in a position where she cannot succeed."
Well said.
Well, we sometimes like to play this closely related game. (If you haven't heard about it before, there are exactly 102,000 hits on various references to it and variations of it on Google.)
Oh, boy -- I can't wait to see some of these. LOL!
OK, perhaps we can try other Miers threads in the name of balance, lol.
Sniff, sniff.... < /elitism >
I'll be looking for your posts on every Miers thread from this point forward. LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.