BUMP
The last time they picked up illegals at a Wall Mart they really weren't Wall Mart employees. They worked for a "Sub Contractor"
Seems as if history is repeating itself!
BUMP
Probably a wise move. I can't imagine what she could say that would be helpful.
"My respect for Wal-Mart just dropped a few notches."
The more you learn about Wal-Mart, the more your respect will drop for them.
Just once I'd like to see the article end "... are being held without air."
OK - more than once. But once would be a start.
If Wal*Mart really wanted to get it's image up, it would fire any contractor who hired a subcontractor who was an illegal alien. This shouldn't be a forgivable offense.
Also, I think the main reason why construction is so full of illegal immigrants is because employment is so overregulated and unions push up wages. Of course, getting a slap on the wrist for hiring illegal aliens doesn't do much to deter contractors from hiring subcontractors with illegals.
How can you hold this against Wal-Mart?
Molested or raped? Is there a pattern here of the media saying girls were "molested" when it's illegals? RAPE IS RAPE! They need to shoot the men who did this.
ping
Note that all of this is part of the "lower prices to consumers" mantra.
Wal-Mart no doubt took the low bid contract. That was supplied by a contractor who chose the lowest priced employees.
Those employees - the illegal aliens - then imposed a cost on society. In this case, the social, emotional, and monetary costs represented by the sexual molestation of two 13 year old girls...and legal costs involved in prosecuting and incarcerating the two pieces of filth that committed the crime.
But what the hey! All bow before the One True God - Lower Prices to Consumers!
thanks GW - family values sure dont stop at the Rio Grande huh?
I"ll wait for the investigation before I vote to hang. In my city we had two little darling girls falsely charge a man with assault, and I wouldn't say its impossible that young kids would lie. But these two if they are illegal are going to get a ride back home to Mexico and probably where they belong.
2907.05. Gross sexual imposition.
(A) No person shall have sexual contact with another, not the spouse of the offender; cause another, not the spouse of the offender, to have sexual contact with the offender; or cause two or more other persons to have sexual contact when any of the following applies:
(1) The offender purposely compels the other person, or one of the other persons, to submit by force or threat of force.
(2) For the purpose of preventing resistance, the offender substantially impairs the judgment or control of the other person or of one of the other persons by administering any drug, intoxicant, or controlled substance to the other person surreptitiously or by force, threat of force, or deception.
(3) The offender knows that the judgment or control of the other person or of one of the other persons is substantially impaired as a result of the influence of any drug or intoxicant administered to the other person with the other person's consent for the purpose of any kind of medical or dental examination, treatment, or surgery.
(4) The other person, or one of the other persons, is less than thirteen years of age, whether or not the offender knows the age of that person.
(5) The ability of the other person to resist or consent or the ability of one of the other persons to resist or consent is substantially impaired because of a mental or physical condition or because of advanced age, and the offender knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the ability to resist or consent of the other person or of one of the other persons is substantially impaired because of a mental or physical condition or because of advanced age.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of gross sexual imposition. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a violation of division (A)(1), (2), (3), or (5) of this section is a felony of the fourth degree. If the offender under division (A)(2) of this section substantially impairs the judgment or control of the other person or one of the other persons by administering any controlled substance described in section 3719.41 of the Revised Code to the person surreptitiously or by force, threat of force, or deception, a violation of division (A)(2) of this section is a felony of the third degree. A violation of division (A)(4) of this section is a felony of the third degree.
(C) A victim need not prove physical resistance to the offender in prosecutions under this section.
(D) Evidence of specific instances of the victim's sexual activity, opinion evidence of the victim's sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the victim's sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease, or the victim's past sexual activity with the offender, and only to the extent that the court finds that the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case and that its inflammatory or prejudicial nature does not outweigh its probative value.
Evidence of specific instances of the defendant's sexual activity, opinion evidence of the defendant's sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the defendant's sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease, the defendant's past sexual activity with the victim, or is admissible against the defendant under section 2945.59 of the Revised Code, and only to the extent that the court finds that the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case and that its inflammatory or prejudicial nature does not outweigh its probative value.
(E) Prior to taking testimony or receiving evidence of any sexual activity of the victim or the defendant in a proceeding under this section, the court shall resolve the admissibility of the proposed evidence in a hearing in chambers, which shall be held at or before preliminary hearing and not less than three days before trial, or for good cause shown during the trial.
(F) Upon approval by the court, the victim may be represented by counsel in any hearing in chambers or other proceeding to resolve the admissibility of evidence. If the victim is indigent or otherwise is unable to obtain the services of counsel, the court, upon request, may appoint counsel to represent the victim without cost to the victim.
HISTORY: 134 v H 511 (Eff 1-1-74); 136 v S 144 (Eff 8-27-75); 137 v H 134 (Eff 8-8-77); 143 v H 208 (Eff 4-11-90); 145 v S 31 (Eff 9-27-93); 147 v H 32. Eff 3-10-98.
http://www.highlandcoso.com/2907.05.htm