Replies

Sure they do. And based on my own knowledge of medical, scientific, and social science research, I know what happens when a political football is the bone of contention. One side produces its "proof" and the other side produces its "proof." Somewhere in there is the truth.

Hmmm. You say the answer is somewhere inbetween but you chastise anyone that posts the 'other side'. Without both sides, you never get to the middle. You make no sense.

The only honest-to-goodness fact that I can tease out of this debate at this point is that something is causing rates of breast cancer to rise dramatically within the same time period that abortion and contraception became the common.

Smoking? Nah - that isn't on the list of risks. Probably some left-wing pro-abortion plot to keep smoking off the list.

The fact that you can't answer a simple question about your position on abortion, but instead resort to playing the victim tells me all I need to know about you.

What would it add? Nothing. You are just trying to imploy rule #5 in the American communist play book.

What would it add? Nothing. You are just trying to imploy rule #5 in the American communist play book.

Stop being such a whiny victim. I readily admit that I am pro-life in the interests of full disclosure. Why is full disclosure so hard for you?

Love the transference regarding the "communist" accusation, though. It was a common commie tactic to take strong public positions on an issue and pretend you were just an average citizen. Above all, you were *not* to admit that you were a member of the communist party. Remember that one? Sound familiar?

I'll ask you again: Do you believe that a woman has a constitutional right to kill her child in the womb?

Hmmm. You say the answer is somewhere inbetween but you chastise anyone that posts the 'other side'. Without both sides, you never get to the middle.

Oh, and btw, I didn't say the answer was 'somewhere in the middle.' I said the truth was in there somewhere. I've read both sides and come to the conclusion that the evidence that there is a link is stronger.

It doesn't surprise me at all that the pro-abort side would go apoplectic at the mere notion that abortion does grave harm--this is not even mentioning the psychological toll that abortion takes on its victims. For the "pro-choice" side, abortion is a sacrament, an act of almost religious significance. And like good little fanatics, they will defend it with all the financial, political, and pseudo-scientific resources they can muster. And considering how profitable Big Abortion has become, they can bring a lot of resources to bear.