[Antoninus]

Hmmm. You say the answer is somewhere inbetween but you chastise anyone that posts the 'other side'. Without both sides, you never get to the middle.

Oh, and btw, I didn't say the answer was 'somewhere in the middle.' I said the truth was in there somewhere. I've read both sides and come to the conclusion that the evidence that there is a link is stronger.

It doesn't surprise me at all that the pro-abort side would go apoplectic at the mere notion that abortion does grave harm--this is not even mentioning the psychological toll that abortion takes on its victims. For the "pro-choice" side, abortion is a sacrament, an act of almost religious significance. And like good little fanatics, they will defend it with all the financial, political, and pseudo-scientific resources they can muster. And considering how profitable Big Abortion has become, they can bring a lot of resources to bear.

[WildTurkey]

Somewhere in there is the truth.

Hmmm. You say the answer is somewhere inbetween but you chastise anyone that posts the 'other side'. Without both sides, you never get to the middle. You make no sense.

Oh, and btw, I didn't say the answer was 'somewhere in the middle.' I said the truth was in there somewhere.

Since you refuted my linkage that truth should be the answer, you are saying you don't want truth to be the answer, you want the answer biased to your side. Thank you.

[WildTurkey]

It doesn't surprise me at all that the pro-abort side would go apoplectic at the mere notion that abortion does grave harm--

So does smoking but they didn't link smoking to increased risk. I suppose you think that is some leftist, liberal plot to hide the smoking risks?