Posted on 10/17/2005 6:43:43 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy
You're never going to find the "perfect" person, doesn't exist on this earth. Second, there is a real fear of Hillary. If Hillary runs, there will be a very STRONG push to "make history" by electing a woman, and we have to face facts: a large portion of the electorate vote with their feeling and not with logic. They will want to "make history" just to do it regardless if the choice is bad. If Hillary run, the entire MSM will be behind her, and the Republicans can not afford to look like the party of rich white men.
I agree. The more I know about her tenure as NSA, and the more I see of her as SoS, esp. vis-a-vis Israel, the less I want to see her do anything else. Besides, she doesn't speak all that well, she's never run for a public office, and I don't think she likes pressing the flesh and kissing babies.
I agree. The more I know about her tenure as NSA, and the more I see of her as SoS, esp. vis-a-vis Israel, the less I want to see her do anything else. Besides, she doesn't speak all that well, she's never run for a public office, and I don't think she likes pressing the flesh and kissing babies.
Rice is certainly an admirable figure, but the 2008 GOP nominee will likely be Giuliani.]
And he'll bury Hillary and anyone else that gets in his way.
Doesn't matter to me one way or the other...She will not get my vote under any circumstances...
Condi is a good candidate because she can defeat Hillary. Minorities and women are the two main pillars of the democratic party and Condi figures to make inroads in both of those areas.
What's her stand on abortion? On taxes? Campaign finance? Kelo? What sort of judges will she name?
Oh, plus she's unmarried. If the Republicans want to win in 2008, especially against Hitlery!, a married candidate is probably worth 3-5 points. If she had been a governor, or even headed a Senate committee (especially Judiciary, but there are others) and shown her beliefs, then yes.
If Rice has ambitions beyond State, she should run for Governor or Senate in 2006 (assuming the seat is open). Track record and timing.
Clinton was being groomed for President in 1976. These things take time, money, and organization. George H. W. Bush could give George W. Bush significant help. W. will not be able to help at the same level.
This is not the Supreme Court. Many extremely talented politicians could not begin to compete at the Presidential level. Example: Schwarzenegger easily won in California, but even if he were eligible, would find it a challenge. And I think that Schwarzenegger, if eligible and interested, would smash almost any career politician. Schwarzenegger at State, though ...
Any Republican candidate needs both money and people on the ground. Check Free Republic, eagleforum, and similar sites (are there many)
One thing I love about Condi is that she is a Second Amendment "absolutist" (her word). For those of us who love the Bill of Rights and lament its eclipse in recent decades, this is sweet music indeed.
Who are Sebastian Cabot and Nikita Khrushchev? I know, but I'll wager that there are many under 40 who have never heard of them. Doug Powers needs to use more current and relevant references even if he is addressing stodgy old republicans.
"And he'll bury Hillary and anyone else that gets in his way."
I may bash New York, but I would rather see a real New Yorker (Guiliani) than the Carpetbagger. I think what makes doing business in New York bad is the outsiders who moved in and trying to kick up dust to "prove themselves". Of course I have other problems w/ Guiliani (abortion, gun control).
I'm in favor of Condi running just because of the utter and complete devastation it would wreak upon the democratic party and Hitlery's cnadidacy specifically. Even if she were not the most perfect candidate (as if anyone is at this point) the damage it would do to the left would do so much to help this country move forward. I hate to think politically like that, but it is what it is. Demoralizing the tyrranical left will help to remove that obstacle to liberty.
You are of a rare breed Doug Powers. Most people, especially those under 50 or so, have no more respect or appreciation for history than they do for their last meal break. That you can casually mention the two you did tells me much about your political and historical awareness. And, you are right about people "getting" jokes, if everyone got them, who would the enlightened ones get to tease?
I also have problems with Rudy's abortion and gun stances, but I suspect the high court will be in pretty good shape come 08 and anybody he appoints will be of the law and order variety.
I recommend "Prince of the City" by Fred Seigel for anyone who is shying away from a Rudy candidacy. He's really quite something and he can lead my party anytime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.