Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press Outraged Over Staged Flagraising
Transterrestrial.com ^ | 10/16/05 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 10/16/2005 10:38:47 AM PDT by StoneGiant

Press Outraged Over Staged Flagraising

March 3rd, 1945

IWO JIMA (Routers) Controversy has erupted among the press corps in the last few days as news has spread that the now-famous picture of the "victorious" flag raising over Iwo Jima a couple weeks ago was staged. Many believe that, as the huge number of casualties mounted in the ill-fated and pointless invasion of this tiny island, the Roosevelt administration, desperate for a bit of pro-war propaganda, arranged to have the photo taken for dissemination to the world's news services.

It has been revealed that the picture was actually of a "recreation" of an earlier flag raising of a much smaller flag, though even that event has now been cast into doubt by the apparent attempt to mislead the press.

There is abundant evidence that the picture was not only unspontaneous, but orchestrated on orders from higher ups.

"None of the men in the picture actually carried the flag to the top," one reporter noted. "It was brought up by a lieutenant in charge, probably at White House orders." In addition, none of the men in the picture had even been injured in the fighting to that point.

The latest propaganda ploy from the administration comes in the midst of doubts about the war strategy, with many thinking this latest bloody adventure particularly misguided. Several thousand Marines have died already in the invasion, and many more have been injured, many losing limbs. Moreover, despite the "victory" implied by the "flag raising," the brave Japanese continue to resist in caves dug deep into the volcanic rock of the doughty little island, with continuing "Allied" casualties. One Republican staffer on the Hill declared that it was Roosevelt's attempt to prematurely declare "major combat operations over," when it was clear that the Japanese were going to continue to fight on to the last man.

Beyond the distaste at what now seems an obvious public-relations ploy, some military strategists argue that the Iwo Jima invasion wasn't worth the cost in resources and blood, or even necessary at all, since the only reason the island is desired is as an auxiliary air base for emergency landings of "Allied" bombers attacking the Japanese homeland.

Some of the anti-war groups are particularly outraged. "We've killed tens of thousands of Japanese soldiers, and several thousand of our own, just so we can save the lives of a few American air crews while they kill hundreds of thousands of helpless Japanese civilians," read a press release from one of the more prominent groups. It continued, "Now we find the Roosevelt administration attempting to cover up its criminal actions by staging events meant to hide the fact that we're losing this cruel war, with massive casualties on all sides."

The White House, of course, attempts to defend its actions. A spokesman points out that no claims have been made that fighting was over, and that the photo was a depiction of a real event that had occurred shortly before, but not been captured by the cameras. He also noted that Mount Suribachi was in fact taken that day, and had not been relinquished since.

This does not satisfy critics in the press or the anti-war movement, however.

"It's important to demonstrate the perfidy and mendacity of this administration now," said one leading spokesman, "before it becomes fixed in the mind of the public as an American 'victory,' or something to be admired and emulated in the future. If we don't set the record straight now, who knows how history will record it? For all we know, they'll decide to put up a bronze statue in Arlington to commemorate it, or something."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flagraising; hypocrisy; iwojima; press; staging
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: squarebarb

Even the WWII protesters are fat and ugly. It appears as if some things never change...


21 posted on 10/16/2005 12:40:30 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
You could make this a full time job, rewriting WWII through the eyes and mindset of today's MSM.

Think of the possibilities;

Then there was the lousy equipment, the MSM today would be having kittens!

Sheesh, now that I look at it, how did we win???
/s

22 posted on 10/16/2005 12:45:19 PM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
We'd be speaking German or Japanese by now.

Carolyn

23 posted on 10/16/2005 12:47:59 PM PDT by CDHart (The world has become a lunatic asylum and the lunatics are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon
You must mean the Soviet Union, don't you?

Lend-Lease started with aid to the Brits in 1941.

24 posted on 10/16/2005 12:52:52 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (A right wing Christian, not part of the Christian Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Serious questions need to be answered.

After Pearl Harbor, why did we attack Guadalcanal, Burma, parts of China,and the Phillipines instead of concentrating our forces on an invasion of Japan?

When Germany declared war on the US, why did we attack North Africa and France instead of a massive invasion of Germany itself?

Inquiring minds want to know! (Sarcasm off)


25 posted on 10/16/2005 1:20:09 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

Great pic. War protesters for WWII. Who'd a thunk?


26 posted on 10/16/2005 1:40:04 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

As I recall, only his untimely death kept FDR from being impeached over that one. Didn't Truman direct the Navy to investigate that terrible "put up job"?


27 posted on 10/16/2005 3:01:24 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Bring the troops home means bring the war home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
The actual photo, before the Pentagon propaganda machine altered it.
28 posted on 10/16/2005 3:06:56 PM PDT by Fatuncle (Iffen I wuzz not iggnerent, I woodn't need to be eddiecated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fatuncle
The statue, as updated by a Democrat White House....

 

29 posted on 10/16/2005 5:55:46 PM PDT by StoneGiant (Power without morality is disaster. Morality without power is useless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson