To: LibertyRocks
Nor will he ever give up his chewing tobacco and spittoon, according to an insider …
The explosive’s lack of trace would in itself be a fingerprint. Combined with the remains of the packaging, detonator and actuator there isn’t much difference between working this type of scene and one where C4 was used.
9 posted on
10/16/2005 2:53:11 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: R. Scott
Oops on the quote - leftover from another thread.
11 posted on
10/16/2005 2:54:21 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: R. Scott
Well that does make a lot of sense, but what about in cases where a bomb squad detonates a suspicious device/package. Wouldn't it make it rather hard to prove there was explosive material in the device to begin with?
12 posted on
10/16/2005 2:57:03 AM PDT by
LibertyRocks
(OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/15) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
To: R. Scott
Nor will he ever give up his chewing tobacco and spittoon, according to an insiderI agree. If he chews tobacco and spits, there will be no trace, because it's made of acetone with a citric acid catalyst.
22 posted on
10/16/2005 3:34:53 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson