Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: R. Scott

Well that does make a lot of sense, but what about in cases where a bomb squad detonates a suspicious device/package. Wouldn't it make it rather hard to prove there was explosive material in the device to begin with?


12 posted on 10/16/2005 2:57:03 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (OUBombing summary (UPDATED 10/15) @ http://sweetliberty.alfablog.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks

Even if the package contained only the explosive – and no hardware – the resulting blast would be larger than expected from just the detonating charge. That would be proof enough it contained explosives.


16 posted on 10/16/2005 3:16:55 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks

"Well that does make a lot of sense, but what about in cases where a bomb squad detonates a suspicious device/package. Wouldn't it make it rather hard to prove there was explosive material in the device to begin with?"

When EOD detonate a suspected bomb, they use a small charge to destroy it. If it's a bomb (or several other substances that can be ignited or set off by shock) they get a secondary explosion that is larger than the little charge they used could be. Most EOD types will be able to tell from the sound if there was anything explosive there, even if there were no residue. (I'd not expect there to be NO residue, but very little is possible, but I'm neither an explosives expert nor a chemist.)


52 posted on 10/16/2005 10:35:09 AM PDT by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson