Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericaUnited

The issue is: who will Bush nominate for hte third and fourth possible openings?


213 posted on 10/15/2005 5:23:44 PM PDT by Paladin2 (MSM rioted over Katrina and looted the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2
The issue is: who will Bush nominate for hte third and fourth possible openings?

Now we're talking. I've always said that he would nominate the 'nuclear candidate'. That would be the right time to go for the throat, since that nominee would push the court well over the tipping point.

228 posted on 10/15/2005 5:36:39 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2

Gonzales and Rove.

That way he can't be impeached.


247 posted on 10/15/2005 5:50:38 PM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2
Here we are at post 213, and finally someone, namely you, says something to advance the discussion. Yes, the really important appointments will be Bush's third and fourth ones to the Supreme Court.

Roberts replacing Rehnquist and Miers replacing O'Connor will not change the philosophy and direction of the Court. But replacing Ginsburg or Stevens WILL make a radical change in the direction of the Court.

That's why you are correct. Those battles, yet to come, are the battles to the death.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Racially-Based, Academic Nonsense"

292 posted on 10/15/2005 10:37:26 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Quoted by Rush, again, this Thursday. Hoohah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson