Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia upset about Estonian monument
Big News Network.com ^ | Friday 14th October, 2005

Posted on 10/15/2005 1:36:23 PM PDT by lizol

Russia upset about Estonian monument

Big News Network.com Friday 14th October, 2005 (UPI)

The Russian government released a statement Friday saying Estonia has mocked the memory of victims of fascism by restoring a monument to an SS legion.

The monument to Estonians who fought on the side of Germany during World War II was put up last year, but taken down after an international outcry, the Novosti news agency reported. The monument is now set to be dedicated Saturday with government officials present.

It is especially outrageous that this is happening in the year that marks 60 years since the end of World War II, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement. A new attempt to glorify the Estonian SS legion shows that official Tallinn (the Estonian capital) continues to have a supportive attitude toward them. We believe that such an approach has no justification.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: baltics; estonia; russia; ss; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: lizol
What is the connection between the two? I see none.

One thing is to deal with current concerns, which indeed must be separated from history. And a monument is another: it deals ONLY with history.

You do not find it abominable to erect a monument honoring SS? You find any considerations that excuse that action?

21 posted on 10/15/2005 3:08:48 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
It says something about how Estonia feels about Russia, that they would rather salute the Nazis.

There are plenty of Estonians that can be saluted to. That they chose Nazi Estonians is their choice, which has nothing to do with the Russians.

22 posted on 10/15/2005 3:09:57 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

Well, if as was said earlier the Russians are seeing them as juicy bits ready to fall back into their empire, this particular remembrance is an "IN YOUR FACE COMMIES" move.


23 posted on 10/15/2005 3:13:07 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Why does it "mock the memory of the victims of fascism" when Estonia celebrates Nazis fighting Communists, but it doesn't mock the memory of the victims of Communism when Russia celebrates Communists fighting Nazis?

There is no mockery: there is irony. Irony is in that Russian communism, while standing on the side of fascism's created great many victims of its own. That fact does not negate that fascism should not be celebrated.

The fact that someone erects a monument in honor of fascism is rightfully considered in isolation: this act has nothing to do with any other part of Estonian (or Russian) history.

Finally, even if the Russian position were inconsistent, what does that have to do with Estonia? It is an independent country, it makes its own choices. It chose to celebrate fascism. And that is an abomination.

24 posted on 10/15/2005 3:15:26 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1
Clearly the Estonians and remainder of eastern Europe hate the Russians more than the Nazis.

No, they did not hate Nazis at all.

Moreover, we are not talking about volunteering for the German army: that could indeed be explained by the desire to liberate themselves from the Russians. These people volunteered for the SS.

Let the Russians whine.....its good for them.

Ah, I see: to make Russians whine, you'd support a memorial to Hitler in Washington also? Do you have any principles, or only hatred for the Russians?

25 posted on 10/15/2005 3:18:38 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
this particular remembrance is an "IN YOUR FACE COMMIES" move.

I see. So, if you have a man you dislike or even hate, it's OK to rape that man's wife?

What I am talking about is means vs. ends: it is the main distinction in the values of Western civilization that the former do NOT justify the latter. Moreover and simpler: no people has ever erected a monument to the "third" party merely to spite a foreign power. To do so would be idiotic. It's like covering your town square in sh-t: foreigners may be dismayed reading about that in the newspapers, but it is you who'll smell it every day. People erect monuments to what THEY themselves honor and celebrates (and if that spites their enemies they get extra satisfaction -- but that is never the main motive).

26 posted on 10/15/2005 3:24:12 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

They're raping nobody. The German Nazis are long gone. But there seems to be a notable lack of interest in actual Nazi politics in Estonia, leaving no other conclusion about why they'd do this than yes, it's to get in Russia's face.


27 posted on 10/15/2005 3:28:38 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
But Hitler was so much worse, it is inconceivable to even begin equating the two.

As I said, because he was more powerful. If Stalin had his power, then he would have been a murderous threat to the existence of civilization. Once someone like Stalin decides to starve 7 million people to death because they weren't going along with his program, it makes little sense at that point to worry about the finer points of whether or not he was "better" than this or that other mass murderer. At that point, the only real difference between him and any of the others is logistical feasibilities.

28 posted on 10/15/2005 3:29:41 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum
You do not find it abominable to erect a monument honoring SS?

Just as abominable as Russians celebrating Soviet Communism.


29 posted on 10/15/2005 3:32:30 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
They're raping nobody.

You obviously missed the point. You would not rape your enemy's wife because that is an immoral act in itself, regardless of whose wife that woman is. The same is here: you approve of Estonians' salute to one of the two main horrors of the XX century. In that you too are raping the memory of the victims of fascism.

You should be ashamed of yourself. In fact, I do not even understand what you are doing on FreeRepublic: your values are completely incompatible with conservative ones.

30 posted on 10/15/2005 3:33:02 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Just as abominable as Russians celebrating Soviet Communism.

Yes. But what does that have to do with the issue at hand?

31 posted on 10/15/2005 3:33:55 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum
It is an independent country, it makes its own choices. It chose to celebrate fascism. And that is an abomination.

I think that they consider this monument to be built in honor of Estonian soldiers (freedom fighters) and not to celebrate fascism itself. Of course it is controversial but I don’t know wherever such historic revisionists like current Russian politicians has the right to protest…

32 posted on 10/15/2005 3:33:59 PM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum
It chose to celebrate fascism.

Actually, no, it chose to celebrate soldiers. Fascist doctrine or policies had nothing to do with the celebration, any more than Communist doctrine or policies had to do with Russia's recent celebrations of the U.S.S.R.'s victory over the Nazis.

33 posted on 10/15/2005 3:35:17 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: inquest; ExitPurgamentum; Tailgunner Joe
...any more than Communist doctrine or policies had to do with Russia's recent celebrations of the U.S.S.R.'s victory over the Nazis.

Actually, I think I may have to take back that comment after seeing the pic at #29. I'll bet the Estonian monument didn't have any swastikas on it.

34 posted on 10/15/2005 3:39:23 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
but Hitler was a threat to the existence of civilization itself in a way that the Soviets were.

You must be kidding: the threat of annihilation by nuclear weapons was not sufficient for you? They collapsed before they could implement their evil designs fully. But they did have those designs, just as Hitler.

More importantly, why is of any relevance to compare to evil regimes when the question is whether any of them may be celebrated?

35 posted on 10/15/2005 3:39:49 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum
Maybe if Russia stopped celebrating the Soviet genocide machine which enslaved Eastern Europe for decades and slaughtered millions more than the nazis, then the Estonians might stop celebrating the Estonian Waffen-SS who fought them.
36 posted on 10/15/2005 3:40:07 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I think this is it.


37 posted on 10/15/2005 3:44:29 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

Gotcha! I never said I approved. I said this was why they did it, and I see why they did it. Also it doesn't seem to be offending people within Estonia itself. (Possibly because the Jews got nudged out of there early in the 1900s well before Nazism could wreak its hell upon them there. That's how my grandfather got to America, by the way.)

That it is shortsighted and wrong in other ways, is undeniable.


38 posted on 10/15/2005 3:45:49 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Actually, no, it chose to celebrate soldiers.

Are you joking?

The monument celebrates those that volunteered to serve in what amounts to death squads. They did not volunteer to liberate their lands.

Fascist doctrine or policies had nothing to do with the celebration,

So what soldiers fight for does not matter? How long did it take you to come up with that "pearl?"

any more than Communist doctrine or policies had to do with Russia's recent celebrations of the U.S.S.R.'s victory over the Nazis.

These celebrations take place at the present time. Asked at the present time whether Nazism should have been defeated you'll probably (although judging from your posts I am not sure) answer in the affirmative. That is why Russians' celebration is not immoral. It is other past actions of the Russian communism that were immoral, and their existence has nothing to do with the celebration.

The monument answer the question differently: the SS death squads -- including numerous Estonians in death camps --- is an abomination. But apparently not to you.

39 posted on 10/15/2005 3:47:42 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

40 posted on 10/15/2005 3:49:26 PM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson