Nope. Unpopular beliefs is one thing - preaching that everyone who is not them should be killed off is counter to species and individual survival and should NOT be tolerated.
In other words, Nazis announce that they are our enemies and want to see the rest of us dead. I'd call that a clear and open threat, wouldn't you?
"In other words, Nazis announce that they are our enemies and want to see the rest of us dead."
Great. And by that standard, we can ban all speech by radical Islamics.
well abortion murders tens of millions a year... why don't you worry about taking away the right to free speech of people who support that? I mean, killing tens of millions seems a little worse than 14 people holding a rally to protest black gangs harassing white people... but I suppose that's always justification for hundreds of black youths to take to the streets, loot, destroy property, set fires, etc...? Right?
Julie Banderas at Fox (of course, the only ones covering and I watched live for like 3 hours... flipped to the other 2 and not once did I see them covering/mentioning it) had a quote from some black guy who had complained to police not to allow the Nazi-rally (which by the way, never even took place)... His quote was now (paraphrasing) "well, what did you think was going to happen when you let them have a rally?" To which I would have said... "Well, I don't think hundreds of thug idiots terrorizing their own neighborhoods and looting and burning down homes is justified by anything here." Even the Toledo Mayor is making ridiculous statements like that. Anyway, do you think then that if the Black Panthers or Nation of Islam have a march in white suburbs we should all band together and run around burning down homes and looting businesses, tearing apart fences (for no apparent reason.)
"preaching that everyone who is not them should be killed off is counter to species and individual survival and should NOT be tolerated."
You mean like this:
Black man advocates [final] "solution" for white people on c-span
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502842/posts
In other words, Nazis announce that they are our enemies and want to see the rest of us dead. I'd call that a clear and open threat, wouldn't you?
Except that's not what the "Nazis" are saying. You are putting words in their mouths. If you can cite specific and clear threats against particular persons, you can initiate criminal proceedings with ease. In fact, this has been done quite often against "Nazis" and anyone else issuing threats. Simply saying "I am a National Socialist" is not a specific threat in any legal sense whatsoever. What we have here are radical leftists making arbitary definitions of another ideology, and then using their definition as justification to kill or harm others before they have in fact done anything to allegedly live up to the leftist "definition" of National Socialism, which is a bullsh_t definition anway- you really think Hitler would have gotten anyone to follow him if he had advocated his own enemies definition of what National Socialism was? Don't be absurd.
Communism killed many, many, many, many times more people than Nazis ever did, and yet no one is advocating that we take away the free speach rights of communists, simply because according to some anti-communist's theoretical definition, "communists announce that they are our enemies and want to see the rest of us dead." Let's punish people for what they actually do, please, not for what your feverish imagination claims they might do in some alternate universe. The fact is Nazis are a tiny and despised minority and are a threat to no one. Going on the body count alone, leftists, communists, and "anti-nazis/anti-fascists" have killed a lot more people than nazis have, so when do we start rounding up all the "anti-nazis", for "public safety"? If we are going to go by guilt of association, let's start with those who themselves are advocating violating the Bill of Rights, since after all what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; let's have those shouting for censorship the loudest, begin by censoring themselves, since they are a far greater real threat to our civil liberties than a handful of nazi nobodies are. Pathetic nazis have no power to silence us. The government does.